It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xavialune
Originally posted by Aeons
There are better ways to deal with a tight foreskin than cutting it off However, he was an adult so if he prefered cutting it off to looking into those options that's his right. I think its a bit of over-kill for a need for some psychologoical help and picking up a book about it - but hey.
Your fetish preference in screwing isn't a sufficient reason to lop off a body part.
edit on 2011/2/24 by Aeons because: (no reason given)
If the foreskin had only been repaired, it still would have been too tight. What other way to deal with it is there? If you know, why dont you tell us. He would have had the same problem over and over if it had not been removed.
Originally posted by antar
reply to post by Aeons
The lady in your avatar would disagree with your stance on sociopathy and self beautification. If a person has a little nip and tuck to look better, feel better what is the harm?
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
It's an incredibly traumatic surgery and the older you get the worse it gets, which is why it's done as young as possible because the child can't actually feel the acute pain an adult would, and it will quickly be forgotten.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
Why not ask a majority of the girls in your surrounding area, whether they prefer to have cut or uncut men? I assure you, the number of women who prefer cut, is staggering! ( I know, I did this as a research assignment years ago )
Many men dont know how to properly bathe themselves, much less clean their " member " correctly~ I know girls who have told me that most men whom are uncut, that they experienced had an " odor ", and the females pleasure was limited.
Besides?, what difference does it make...I mean honestly....most people don't even have religious views that get it done anyway....are you going to suggest they are going to hell now?
Originally posted by Fromabove
reply to post by Big Raging Loner
The foreskin "can" be pulled back, but you won't get any more pleasure than the limited amount one would have anyway. The more skin you have, the less stimulation you have. No foreskin makes for a more stiff and rigid penis, and that means more friction once inside, and that means more bliss.
One of the reasons some men don't like condoms is because it makes for less friction and less pleasure. All that unnecessary skin does the same thing.
As for cleanliness, there are hordes of medical testimony on that.
edit on 24-2-2011 by Fromabove because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
To liken this to female circumcision is flat out ignorant. One removes the ability to climax; the other doesn't.
Originally posted by Xavialune
Just have to chime in here and say from a woman's point of view..
Uncircumcised penises are disgusting. Sorry guys. And I'd reckon most women feel this way. Some dont care, but I'd be willing to say there arent a lot of women who actually PREFER an uncircumcised penis. But when women are speaking honestly, like perhaps with other women..it is typically the view that uncircumcised puts us off.
you cannot compare this with the mutilation of the female vagina when the clitoris is removed. that means absolutely no pleasure for the woman. for a man, its obvious pleasure is not taken away and some men you can talk to who were uncircumcised and were circumcised later in life will tell you they prefer it too.
Its up to the parent really. I'd say let the kid decide later in life, but I've known some guys like that and being circumcised later in life has psychologically scarred some of them...so maybe thats not the best idea.