Live now: German, Chinese and American vessels in Libyan waters., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 140 times
Topic started on 23-2-2011 @ 05:44 PM by LestatG
Hey all, the past few days I have been posting on the thread Libyan pilots defect to Malta.

It started when the two jets landed at Malta.

Since then I have found myself in a place where everything is unfolding in front of my eyes. Please see serenecalamityz thread for the back information.

I felt that this needed its own thread due the fact I feel my 'sources' who are more like acquaintances, friends of friends and people I have spoken with whom have a certain position where they have the info have credibility with their 'claims'.

Firstly I posted earlier at around 1800 about Maltese authorities refusing permission for a plane to land for suspicions of having Gaddafi's daughter on board.
This is now being reported for the first time on Al Jazeera about 15 minutes ago - so gave me a certain belief in the credibility (to a certain point) of the things I am being told.

At the same time I received a phone call telling me about what was happening at the Excelsior Hotel in Floriana / Valletta, Malta.

I had been in the hotel for several hours earlier and witnessed some strange goings on when there, and the call came from the person that I was with and stayed after I had left there.

When there I saw German Air force in the lobby and by the time I had left there were Journalists checking in and there was a certain commotion and an air of urgency lingering around.

I have now been informed that the hotel is full and there is no space in the lobby (which is fairly large) full of people with "International S.O.S" on the back of their jackets.

German, Chinese and American ships are now entering Libyan waters and are to be supported with British fighters to protect them although they have no authorisation to enter Libyan airspace.

Now these ships are thought to be Navy, but this cannot and has not been confirmed. However, in my perception it does make sense if the rumours regarding Gaddafi manoeuvring his ships targeted at Tripoli are true.

They are there as an estimated 1.5 million people are to be evacuated immediately and this is why the ships are there with protection,

I will of course update if I learn of anything else.

Please do not take this as the 'truth' this is what I have been told and I can’t confirm all of it.

I have seen some of this with my own eyes and other information has turned out to be confirmed later on independently, so I thought I would put it out there,

I hope this goes ok and withers out soon, it does seem to have gone very international, very violent, very quick

Peace

edit on 23/2/2011 by LestatG because: some typo's, not much sleep over past few days!



reply posted on 23-2-2011 @ 06:08 PM by dainoyfb
International SOS is a company that provides medical and security support and related logistical consulting for companies and organizations operating out of country.


reply posted on 23-2-2011 @ 06:31 PM by curioustype
reply to post by schuyler



I saw a news report somewhere (yesterday?) which quoted a senior military figure, part of Egypt's temporary leadership team, who was quoted as saying that Egypt had an estimated 1.5 million citizens inside Libya, he gave advice for them to stay indoors and stock up on food and water. It was in the context of the troop movements (Libyan withdrawal and egyptian surge) at the Libyan Egyptian border, and the surge in refugees there from Eastern Libya.

It appears that there are likely to be thousands of foreign nationals still there from many other countries.

I was certainly concerned about the news that evacuation ships are now getting stranded in port or just off-shore due to severe weather in the Med. They are far too close for comfort to the mainland, let alone air or sea forces IF Gaddafi has any?

I am also deeply concerned that those in the 'liberated' Eastern Libya, and indeed neihbouring countries are at high risk of some kind of (Scud type) attack (bio/chem/explosive) from this furious tyrant.



reply posted on 23-2-2011 @ 06:42 PM by majestic3
reply to post by LestatG

in the UK they said they were sending a destroyer in to evacuate British citizens but they was going to ask permit ion first
edit on 23-2-2011 by majestic3 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-2-2011 @ 06:44 PM by LestatG
reply to post by schuyler



I saw one of the cruise liners come to port this morning from my home, later found out that was from Libya with US nationals and some French workers.

(great humour with the link name) I forgot to smile most of the day,

Thanks


reply posted on 23-2-2011 @ 07:05 PM by schuyler
Originally posted by surrealist
I was wondering if Obama was pointing to possible war with Libya, should the violence continue, he certainly didn't rule it out. It would probably be an amitious though good political move on his part, maybe?


I just don't see it myself. The US has no significant assets in the area. It would take at least a week to get one of the Ararbian Gulf carriers up into the Med through the Suez. The only nearby Amphibious Ready Group is the Kearsarge now in the Red Sea, but it is short 1500 Marines it lent to Afghanistan. There are no Army forces anywhere near. And it would take weeks to get any other carriers nearby because all the East Coast carriers are at or near Norfolk, Virginia.

And the thing is, carrriers don't cut it. All they are is calvary with no infantry support. They carry a bunch of F/A-18s that are certainly capable of establishing air superiority and bombing the crap out of a country, but I doubt that is what anyone wants at this stage. When the US went into Iraq (the second time) the entire 2nd Army--all of it--was sitting in a port in Turkey waiting for permission it never got to invade from the North. The entire Third Army--all of it--was sitting in Kuwait which, as it turned out, was more than adequate for the job. No such situation exists in or near Libya. It would take the US months to prepare. We don't have months; we don't even have weeks.

And for what? Yet a third operation? I get a kick out of the UN batting around the idea that the UN should create a no fly zone in Libya and the US can support it. Thanks, UN, but how about YOU support it? Call in the Italian Air Force. The fact is, we're too busy right now. You can't complain that the US is into everybody's business and then turn around and call on the US every time something happens to bail somebody out.

And besides, I think Obama is too gutless to even think about it.


reply posted on 23-2-2011 @ 07:15 PM by LestatG
reply to post by schuyler



So by what you say logistically it’s impossible, and I believe you are right with the time frame this is happening now.

I feel another country other than the US will step in, unfortunately I can see an international incident just waiting to happen, it seems that everything is in a state were something even more dreadful that what is going on now can happen,

Anyway, unfortunately I have to sleep been up since 6am and its gone 2, have to be back up at 6 again.

'See' you in the morning

Peace


reply posted on 23-2-2011 @ 07:23 PM by curioustype
reply to post by Hundroid



That's 300,000 immigrants of Libyan nationality expected by Italy (is that just into Italy?) ON TOP of the 1.5 million Egyptians and thousands of other foreign nationals potentially trying to flee - I think, and they, their transportation and routes are increasingly at risk from Gadaffi lashing out, possibly with WMD (chem/bio).


Commentators compare turmoil in North Africa and ME to the 1989 disruption of communist regimes all over East Europe.


I certainly think history will mark these events as of at least equal significance, which in itself could pose difficult questions for China and other non-democracies, dictatorships and human rights abusers.

Unlike the collapse of the Eastern block, there are significant differences I think, which may include:

- A far higher amount of foreign interests (financial, strategic and political) having been disrupted or threatened in the ME than EB? And involving competing and hostile continental concerns. I am sure that at the time the EB didn't harbour the kind of international investment/interests the ME does now.

- The potential of hostile parties (either existing - such as Gadaffi - or future developments of any of the destabilised states) to disrupt major trade routes and fuel supply resources (e.g. another oil well burn, scorched earth, or civil wars...) is surely very different?

- In the EB collapse, weren't all eyes on Russia, the hostile (nuclear armed) nation left feeling 'surrounded' and looking a little paranoid, now, in the ME is Israel' in a similarly paranoid looking position, or could a possible Sunni/Shi-ite conflict/escalation emerge, or both?


- When the EB fell there was no internet, flash cards, or laptops, and hardly any mobile phones,, and I think that many nations, beyond the ME will be very concerned about the incredible viral nature of these rebellions, not least China, who now have a far larger and wealthier population, and far more importance and influence on the world's economic, political and strategic fortunes? Won't these ME nations be entering, and shaping, a very different world stage of influence, power, and super-power?

edit on 23-2-2011 by curioustype because: typo corrected

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 18 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 4 days ago with 72 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 14 days ago with 26 member flags
President Obama Affirms His Support for Same Sex Marriage
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 6 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 12 days ago with 23 member flags
US judge blocks indefinite detention of Americans
  Posted 12 days ago with 21 member flags