It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TPTB already took care of Loughner and replaced him with a duplicate.

page: 7
11
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 09:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Doomzilla
reply to post by derst1988
 


If you zoom into the 1st mugshot . Do you thinks its 100% umtampered with ?

The 2nd I think is untouched and was the original . You ?
Why do you think they released the 2nd mugshot ? What has it achieved , who has it benefited ?


It could be slightly tampered with, but i dont see the tell tale signs.

The second mug shot is in prisoner clothing, as opposed to the white tee he was in in the first shot. I posted the link to the UN-CROPPED version of the OP's "original shot".

the reasoning behind it is, i dont believe that they would keep a image of him in civilian clothing for his permanent record. And IF this is not the reason, maybe someone along the line stated that he deserves a fair trial and that the jury needs to see a less sadistic image. My guess is the former reason as this was done for my cousin who went to jail.




posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 09:31 AM
link   
Wow...this site loses creditability each and every day. Just when I thought it couldnt get any worse...this thread is made. C'mon people...think before we start a new thread and ask yourself if it makes sense. Sure there are a lot that really don't but this one is just plain lack of common sense.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 09:33 AM
link   
By the way the difference in photos is because of the quality of either the camera or image.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 09:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by pacofunk64
Wow...this site loses creditability each and every day. Just when I thought it couldnt get any worse...this thread is made. C'mon people...think before we start a new thread and ask yourself if it makes sense. Sure there are a lot that really don't but this one is just plain lack of common sense.


Im sorry, as much as i disagree with this thread, the OP has the right to post it. Human rights, and ill be damned if someone is not allowed his free speech.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 09:52 AM
link   
Holy crap...really.... It's the same guy!!! Just two different pictures. He is wearing a jump suit in one!!! one is prob. booking that day of the shooting and then the next day after he got his shower or what ever they do after they do holdings! Does everything have to be a cover up!! WTF I feel sorry for some of you! Maybe look into police SOP's on booking and arresting someone. You might find some answers as to why he is in a different outfit and looks cleaned up!



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 10:27 AM
link   
Which ever way you look at it..

Weather they are the same guy or different people.

I only have two things to say.

1) They are both butt ugly

and

2) They look like Uncle Fester..!!



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 10:36 AM
link   
reply to post by derst1988
 


I hope you realise all im doing is questioning this event . Im not claming to know the truth but I still believe the guy is innocent til proven guilty - However Im sceptical that they will release the "evidence " they use to convict him and if they dont il be even more suspicious .

Peace



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 11:10 AM
link   
why is everyone missing the fact that his eye color has changed? blue 2 brown!! that is 100% evidence of photoshop



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 11:24 AM
link   
I know it's a conspiracy theory website but come on now, really? Are people really this dull?

There are some members who believe the government is monitoring this website and thinks that the government "thinks ATS may be a threat."

However, if I was a federal agent and saw the front page lately, I'd chuckle and close out of the browser. No threat here. Just boredem.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 11:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Doomzilla
reply to post by derst1988
 


I hope you realise all im doing is questioning this event . Im not claming to know the truth but I still believe the guy is innocent til proven guilty - However Im sceptical that they will release the "evidence " they use to convict him and if they dont il be even more suspicious .

Peace


I do, and ive stated that this has no effect on whether he is guilty or not. Im just stating my view on the questions posted that I have experience with, and thats photo analysis. I highly doubt the real evidence will be released. I am suspicious as well. Innocent till proven guilty is necessary, but to say that someone is indeed arrested by the evidence of 2 photos does not ever equate to guilty. Look at all the people that were "guilty" for 30 years and DNA testing shows their not now.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 11:42 AM
link   
Echoing my comments on an earlier post today, this thread is yet another that goes to show many folks on ATS will find whatever they are looking for, whether or not it's really there.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 12:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Doomzilla
reply to post by crimsonninja
 


YES - i said this to my girl , lots of people have camera phones, I find it hard to believe no footage leaked anywhere .


Really?? I dont have an explanation for this other than, If no one had their cameras out and were already rolling before the event, i highly doubt that "oh hey, someone is rapid firing a gun into this crowd, let me get my phone out and record it instead of trying to save my butt and/or keep from getting shot and dying!!"

If you have never been in a live fire scenario, i can see how you would think the first thing you would want to do is get out your phone. 32 rounds in that small amount of time in a crowd that size is Chaos at the least, and pandemonium at best. But i can guarantee you, you would be A. running/ducking for cover and B. forgot you even had a phone much less want to fire up its camera.

My .02¢

Silver



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 12:45 PM
link   
Is this argument still alive? This is clearly JLL in both pictures. The lighting is different and he has a different expression, but its the same person. Comparison A looks like it was shot under a diffused Fluorescent bulb where as Comparison B looks as if it was shot with a direct, high wattage, Incandescent light with a low ambient lighting.
As for the artist rendition: JLL may have grown some stubble on his head whilst being incarcerated. But most likely it is a bad artist. I remember when the OJ trial was news... and all of those artist renditions made me cringe. Sure, maybe the renditions resembled the original character, but there was certainly a large margin of interpretation.

/thread.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 12:47 PM
link   
IMO if you think there is something to the conspiracy angle to this story there are far more eligible trees to bark up than the picture angle. Since this is all conjecture anyway what about a common sense asusmption: If TPTB have managed this very elaborate manipulation of facts, people, and media they are not going to slip up and put out two pictures of different guys.

Now, if I let my imagination run.............perhaps the two different pictures are the same guy with intended discrepencies woven into the pics to serve as a distraction from the real (and perhaps more provable) elements of the story???



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 12:48 PM
link   
reply to post by S1LV3R4D0
 


I think you may be barking up the wrong tree.
Why do you quote only that short sentence of mine to make your Hilarious response ?

Where did I EVER say that the witnesses INVOLVED should film it nobhead?
Im talking about the people who were bystanders - EVEN one of the #kn witnesses said that he saw someone using a camera so wtf is your point ?

Im glad youve been in shootouts Im sure your real tough but I could care less .
Get your facts straight before you misquote me.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 12:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by derst1988
Im sorry, as much as i disagree with this thread, the OP has the right to post it. Human rights, and ill be damned if someone is not allowed his free speech.


Exactly my point...and this is why America is where it is because stupid people think they can say what they want when they want.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 01:02 PM
link   
reply to post by derst1988
 


LOL
I almost did not want to reply to you and add to this pointless wannabe conspiracy but I had to regardless of what people think or want to believe it's the same person.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 01:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by pacofunk64

Originally posted by derst1988
Im sorry, as much as i disagree with this thread, the OP has the right to post it. Human rights, and ill be damned if someone is not allowed his free speech.


Exactly my point...and this is why America is where it is because stupid people think they can say what they want when they want.


Actually no, it is the way it is because of corruption and disinformation; but its cool, comments like yours are stupid too but you still have the right to say them.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 01:15 PM
link   
reply to post by filosophia
 


Authorities? If by authorities you mean the media, in which they ALWAYS do things like this to put their own spin on stories, then yes.



posted on Feb, 24 2011 @ 01:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Doomzilla
 


Hmm must have struck a nerve to have you resort to name calling and cussing. I just stated scenario ideas to your inquiry. Kinda hard to misquote you when i took it directly from your own post. Good luck with your delusions kid.
I can see how your xbox induced first person shooter mind wouldnt be able to understand it.


missin the days of the ignore button around here.




top topics



 
11
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join