It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Loughner Mug Shot Released

page: 9
9
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   
ahhhh, now it makes possible sense that the reason his earlier photo showed blue eyes(pre mugshot) and the mugshot brown eyes is from the shading.
This second pic looks better but in black and white.
But why to the point that the blue eyes turn brown and then hazel or green?
It looks like they are shading both pics.




posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:07 PM
link   
someone should take both picture's to tinyeye and reverse look up the photos and see what they find out and report back here



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Doomzilla
reply to post by pianopraze
 


YO praze , I'm gonna ask you because i know were on the same side .
Why would they release this latest photo when they know its going to lead to suspicions that the 1st one was tampered with ?

Is this just a game to them ? To see if we cotton on to the obvious flaws discrepancies and conflicting information .
OR if we just take their word for it that this is what happened .


You assume that people have a memory, they don't. They are hypnotized and desensitized. MSM get away with this crap and much worse all the time...



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:13 PM
link   
reply to post by crimsonninja
 


I always wondering why he was permitted to look so smiley and crazy in the first mug shot they choose to release, I've never seen that in a mug short before.



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:21 PM
link   
It's not the same person. You can tell by the receding hairline. The first mug shot's of him show it most and now with these new mugshots his hairline magically reappears. Perhaps he was possessed.

edit on 23-2-2011 by MITSwagger because:




posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by BrokenCircles
 


Come on come on......

New pic:
1. Rounder face
2. top lip thinner
3. crokked nose
4. ear lobes
5. no moles (or freckles)
6. shape of eyes differ including inside eye lid near top of bridge of nose
7. bottom lip thicker
8. shorter neck
9. different chin

I could go on and on but this is not the same guy as previous pic......PERIOD


Sometimes I wish I could hand out common sense as a gift, its the lighting PEROID.
You live in a world of conspiracies I assume, so your trying your hardest to get these two photos to fit your belief system as are others. Your trying to read between the lines, when there is nothing to read.



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by manna2
ahhhh, now it makes possible sense that the reason his earlier photo showed blue eyes(pre mugshot) and the mugshot brown eyes is from the shading.
This second pic looks better but in black and white.
But why to the point that the blue eyes turn brown and then hazel or green?
It looks like they are shading both pics.


The lighting is shooting from above creating deep shadows downwards, he seems to have a heavy brow and that will cast a shadow across the eyes disguising the eye color.



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by crimsonninja
wow i woke up expecting this thread to be dead, a lot happened while i was sleeping lol
so we found out that these two pictures were taken on the same day ? now that is weird
and the sketches of him at court look nothing like jared at all! and they are usually almost
usually identical i remember the ones of michael jackson and it was spot on, now we have
jared and they look nothing like either photo we have, not to mention the changes in eye color
and the difference in the scars ,nose, chin, head , and ears it is like this is all some movie and
the new picture is his stunt double, and it is interesting to find out that jared reported a id theft
report, i bet all of his online persona are fabricated all in advance of this incident.they have not
shown this man on tv at all and they probably will never either, any other person they would have
shown him being taken into the court room, why the secrecy ? and why release another photo ?



Hi again .
Yes its looking like they are trying to cover something up .
We have 3 "mugshots" now but none have the id board/plate thing .
I was talking with my fiend til 5 in the morning about this .
I have no clue why theyd release another photo what does it achieve ?
I have a horrible feeling that the internet involvement , the witness testimony is fake . The whole thing .
I think they are only going to show what backs the os up .

They don't have to show us the shooting footage But at least show the 15 mins he was there Before the shooting !



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by WielderOfTheSwordOfTruth
Really?
how people can change(weight) over time.


But the photos were taken fairly close to each other, the recent photo was taken 3 days after the shooting. Would he lose that much weight in 3 days? Maybe if they starved him.

This says the first mugshot was released on Jan. 10.

www.huffingtonpost.com...

The shooting took place on the 8, so the two photos are just one day apart from each other, would he really lose that much weight in one day?
edit on 23-2-2011 by filosophia because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Doomzilla
 


should find out what jail he is in and call there and ask if he is incarcerated there cant hurt to try



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by crimsonninja
reply to post by Doomzilla
 


should find out what jail he is in and call there and ask if he is incarcerated there cant hurt to try




I know, someone should just call and ask him if he did it or not, or why he did it. He did plead not-guilty, maybe he wants his story to reach the media.



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:55 PM
link   




Crimson , forget the 1st mugshot released .

Compare 2008 "jared " to early 2011
edit on 23-2-2011 by Doomzilla because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by filosophia

Originally posted by WielderOfTheSwordOfTruth
Really?
how people can change(weight) over time.


But the photos were taken fairly close to each other, the recent photo was taken 3 days after the shooting. Would he lose that much weight in 3 days? Maybe if they starved him.

This says the first mugshot was released on Jan. 10.

www.huffingtonpost.com...

The shooting took place on the 8, so the two photos are just one day apart from each other, would he really lose that much weight in one day?
edit on 23-2-2011 by filosophia because: (no reason given)


It's quite clear that he had his face pulled backward in the one where he appears "heavier." If you follow the freckles and such, you'll notice that they are where they would be if he had he head pulled back as far as he could, making it look like he had more fat on his neck. There's no weight loss going on.



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:55 PM
link   
reply to post by filosophiayou can't just call and talk to him, however it would be interesting to find out if he is indeed locked up
they will not lie if they are asked if they have jared loughner in custody there,



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 03:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Doomzilla




Crimson , forget the 1st mugshot released .

Compare 2008 "jared " to early 2011
edit on 23-2-2011 by Doomzilla because: (no reason given)



wow they look nothing alike !



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 04:00 PM
link   
no matter what light those are two diffrentt noses



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 04:00 PM
link   
Lol. This thread is a fail. The nose, jaw line and chin are the same. Not to mention everything else. Sorry, try again.



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 04:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Varemia
 


his face isn't pulling that much more backwards than the recent photo, he still has a slight smirk in the recent photo, and I can't believe that smiling makes freckles appear.
edit on 23-2-2011 by filosophia because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 04:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by OrphenFire
Lol. This thread is a fail. The nose, jaw line and chin are the same. Not to mention everything else. Sorry, try again.


everything you said was the same is everything that is not the same lol you fail



posted on Feb, 23 2011 @ 04:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by Varemia
 


his face isn't pulling backwards that much, he still has a slight smirk in the recent photo, and I can't believe that smiling makes freckles appear.


No, but certain lighting does. I can't seem to get that through to your brain.



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join