It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gwynned
Geeze, you're spending lots of time trying to debunk us debunkers, trying to prove to the mad crazy people here that we're mad and crazy. Whatsup with that?
Originally posted by BrokenCircles
Originally posted by gwynned
Geeze, you're spending lots of time trying to debunk us debunkers, trying to prove to the mad crazy people here that we're mad and crazy. Whatsup with that?
Didn't take much time, and I'm not busy anyways, but.....
On the contrary, I had already given reasonable explanations for everything, and so have others.
All I was trying to do with that particular post, was to encourage others to accept common sense instead of embracing ignorance.
Originally posted by inkyminds
Originally posted by Doomzilla
See its so hard to argue on this because we don't know the full picture .
If he was unstable , and bear in mind a LOT of people have claimed this , why was nothing done ?
People fall through the craps of our gutted mental health system all the time.
REALLY ? so theres shooting like this "all the time " is there ??????
Why did Jareds parents not see that their son was mentally unstable ?
"Who says the didn't?"
WHO says THEY did ?
How did he pass the apptitude test for the army ?
When did he pass an aptitude tes for the army? He was rejected by them for undisclosed reasons.
IM NOT doin your work for you boy . suffice to say you have not researched .
How did he buy a gun ? and ammo ?
By going to a sporting goods store and having money. Arizona has VERY few regulations against buying handguns, little to no waiting period, etc.
WHY did he get refused the purchase of the ammo the 1st time then Einstein ?
Are yo sure you've researched this issue AT ALL?
Originally posted by BrokenCircles
reply to post by gwynned
The statements that you are making has nothing to do with the topic of this particular thread. The discussion that I have been a part of within this thread is ONLY about the 2 pics being of the same person. I have not made any comments at all about anything in the actual case. I have made no comments pertaining to my opinion of the event that happened. I have made no mention of guilt or innocence. All of my comments have been about pointing out the obvious that these 2 pics are of the same person.
Once again, I ask you to think before making a comment. You are coming to a conclusion of my thoughts and opinions on this case, where I have stated none.
Originally posted by Doomzilla
Originally posted by inkyminds
Originally posted by Doomzilla
See its so hard to argue on this because we don't know the full picture .
If he was unstable , and bear in mind a LOT of people have claimed this , why was nothing done ?
People fall through the craps of our gutted mental health system all the time.
REALLY ? so theres shooting like this "all the time " is there ??????
Why did Jareds parents not see that their son was mentally unstable ?
"Who says the didn't?"
WHO says THEY did ?
How did he pass the apptitude test for the army ?
When did he pass an aptitude tes for the army? He was rejected by them for undisclosed reasons.
IM NOT doin your work for you boy . suffice to say you have not researched .
How did he buy a gun ? and ammo ?
By going to a sporting goods store and having money. Arizona has VERY few regulations against buying handguns, little to no waiting period, etc.
WHY did he get refused the purchase of the ammo the 1st time then Einstein ?
Are yo sure you've researched this issue AT ALL?
Yes ive researched it more than You ! Ask Getsmart , pianopraze , filosophia and Crimson ninja ..
The problem with mugshots' usage as a lineup tool lies with the uniformity of mugshots taken from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Whereas similar looking suspects presented in an unbiased photographic manner leads to identifications that can influence judges and juries, carelessly taken mugshots, mugshots with different lighting, different colored-backgrounds, disparate poses or aspect ratios may lead to bias in identifying perpetrators of crime - oftentimes leading to prosecutors determining that this type of evidence would be impermissible or worse the successful suppression of this type of evidence in courts of law. Thus, to create photographic arrays that consist of similar photographs fall into the hands of individuals making subjective decisions.
The NIST has developed the Best Practice Recommendation for the Capture of Mugshots. These practices, developed over the course of several years, were introduced in 1997 to mandate uniformity and consistency in mugshot taking. To create and maintain uniformity, NIST suggests standardization of the following photograph specifications:
Types of Poses
Depth of Field
Centering
Lighting
Background
Exposure
Aspect Ratio
Minimum Number of Pixels
Color Space
Pixel Aspect Ratio
Compression Algorithm
File Format
Source: Mugshot Capturing - NIST Best Practices
The subject whose image is being captured shall be positioned in front of a background which is 18% gray with a plain smooth flat surface. A Kodak or other neutral gray card or densitometer shall be used to verify this 18% gray reflectance requirement.
Subject illumination shall be accomplished using a minimum of three (3) point balanced illumination. Appropriate diffusion techniques shall also be employed and lights positioned to minimize shadows, and to eliminate hot spots on the facial image. These hot spots usually appear on reflective areas such as cheeks
and foreheads. Proper lighting shall contribute to the uniformity of illumination of the background described in the exposure requirement.
Source: BEST PRACTICE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE CAPTURE OF MUGSHOTS
Facial expression:
The expression should be neutral (non-smiling) with both eyes open normally (i.e. not wide-open), and mouth closed. Every effort should be made to have supplied images conform with this specification. A smile with closed jaw is not recommended.
Subject lighting:
Lighting shall be equally distributed on the face. There shall be no significant direction of
the light from the point of view of the photographer. The region of the face, from the crown to the base of the chin, and from ear-to-ear, shall be clearly visible and free of shadows. In particular, there shall be no dark shadows in
the eye-sockets due to the brow and the iris and pupil of the eyes shall be clearly visible.
Source: BEST PRACTICE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE CAPTURE OF MUGSHOTS