It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Anybody up for a paradigm shift?

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 12:38 PM
link   
A paradigm shift is a radical change in underlying beliefs or theory. On a societal level, paradigm shifts can be earth changing events, such as discovering, confirming, and accepting that the earth is round.

This thread is presented to provide evidence of factors that represent perhaps the most massive and impending paradigm shift in our civilization’s history, and to debate the worldwide impact of this paradigm shift.


Our government appears to be spending money without concern for our massive and increasing debt, why? Below is a chart from the US Treasury illustrating our increasing debt. Could we be on the verge of money being of little or no value? What would cause money to be of little or no value? What would this mean for our civilization as we know it?


09/30/2010 13,561,623,030,891.79
09/30/2009 11,909,829,003,511.75
09/30/2008 10,024,724,896,912.49
09/30/2007 9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 6,783,231,062,743.62
09/30/2002 6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 5,807,463,412,200.06
09/30/2000 5,674,178,209,886.86

www.treasurydirect.gov...

Money is of little or no value in a reality where energy is widely available at little to no cost, technology enables us to travel the stars, and resources are essentially limitless.

How close is this to being our reality?

"We" (military industrial complex? factions of our government? bureaucracies?) appear to have technology beyond our wildest dreams? What would happen if the dots were connected and we all knew about it?

Have a look at the following links:


(Naval Space Command Image from Living Moon)

Zorgon’s thread regarding the US Naval Space Command:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
and:
info @ Living Moon: www.thelivingmoon.com...

Mikesingh’s thread on secret US Space Program:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Slayer’s thread regarding Star Wars:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Zorgon’s thread regarding dipole fusion confinement:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Intelgurl’s and Kangaruex4Ewe’s threads on black budgets:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Agarta’s Energy thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

HE3:
fti.neep.wisc.edu...
fti.neep.wisc.edu...

These links provide evidence that we have space faring technologies and other technologies that would fundamentally impact our understanding of our current reality.

What if we were presented with evidence of bulk shipments of HE3 being made decades ago? (Winkwinknudgenudgebumpbump – you know who I am talking to!) HE3 does not exist on earth except in minuscule amounts. Roughly one space shuttle cargo bay’s worth of HE3 would provide all of the electricity that America uses for a year. Clean, radioactive free power... Where "would" (read: did) this HE3 come from? The moon? How did we get it here DECADES ago???

The arc representing our technological advancement has gone vertical. The old thinking - "the military is 25 - 30 years ahead of the private sector" is no longer even close to our current reality. We did not even have the internet or cell phones in use 30 years ago... (we can actually manipulate atoms now and create matter...couple this ability with unlimited energy...) Is a controlled release of technology best for our civilization?

What is preventing the release of this paradigm shifting information (hesitant to use the term “disclosure,” though its relevance/connection here cannot be denied...)? Does OPEC have the muscle to keep it under wraps? Perhaps. More importantly, unlimited clean energy and knowledge of our true technological capacities would radically and fundamentally change our civilization. Currently, our entire world economy is developed and centered around oil/gas/coal production and the technologies that develop it and run on it. How would we transition to an entirely new energy paradigm?

How do we prevent massive economic crises, massive unemployment, and mass hysteria with public knowledge of the reality of our technological capabilities and access to nearly limitless, nearly free energy?

While I expect that we could handle “disclosure” of our current technological capabilities, would that “disclosure” necessitate disclosure of the other kind?

I believe that one of two things will eventually occur: our way of life and understanding of reality will change dramatically in a massive paradigm shift -- but how?

Or, the power and wealth created by these technologies creates (or has created) the most powerful cartel in the history of our civilization. Imagine OPEC on super steroids, times fifty. Or a thousand...




posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 12:53 PM
link   
Yes. Dont rush it. Its coming, its being slowled by the powers that be but thats okay becuase it gives more time for stragglers to get on board until its too heavy to stop.



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 12:54 PM
link   
Disclosure won't hurt anything.

Look at the schematics for building a nuclear bomb. It's open to the public.

But who can built it? Right, no one. Only massively funded institutions are even close to capable of it, and most have incredible troubles pulling it off.

That's what disclosure would do. Very little in terms of technological change.

It may cause a revolt though due to the fact we find out they are hiding all these neat toys and that aliens somehow don't need govt raping them yet somehow we need govt to rape us.



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 12:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by crystalbeing
Yes. Dont rush it. Its coming, its being slowled by the powers that be but thats okay becuase it gives more time for stragglers to get on board until its too heavy to stop.


Are you holding out on us -- c'mon now, share whachugot!!



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 01:06 PM
link   
This gives more insight to the whole "drill baby drill" ideology. The governments/PTB are not careless enough to not realize that oil is not an infinite commodity. So why do they continue to drill so heavily? Because the time of Oil being essential to everything is soon coming to an end. The only reason they want to push the Oil so heavily (and charge so much for it) is to secure THEIR financial success in the present/future. Just a thought.

Edit: By Financial success I mean POWER.
edit on 22/2/2011 by TheSparrowSings because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 01:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by muzzleflash
Disclosure won't hurt anything.

Look at the schematics for building a nuclear bomb. It's open to the public.

But who can built it? Right, no one. Only massively funded institutions are even close to capable of it, and most have incredible troubles pulling it off.


I think we're more afraid of what would happen should a bomb fall into the wrong hands than we are worried about who can build it (though obviously this is still a big concern). Which brings up a good point Muzzle, what would happen if other massively funded institutions also had our technologies? Obviously, having this technology all to ourselves gives us a tremendous advantage over other countries...but in the wrong hands???


That's what disclosure would do. Very little in terms of technological change.

It may cause a revolt though due to the fact we find out they are hiding all these neat toys and that aliens somehow don't need govt raping them yet somehow we need govt to rape us.


Just a revolt? Oh, ok then!



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 01:17 PM
link   
reply to post by TheSparrowSings
 


Good point Sparrow -- never leave a dollar on the table, right?

So who's pulling the strings? Who is profiting? Who's pockets are getting lined? My impression is that most of these technologies are in the hands of the military, attached bureaucracies, and a handful of private contractors. The military would want to keep it all secret to maintain its tremendous advantage; bureaucracies would do whatever keeps themselves funded; and private contractors would likely want to go public with the info if they could profit from it more than they do already through the "black" projects with the military...



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 04:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Yukitup
 


So it seems, from what I gather (and I do agree) about these "pocket-lining" people that it still comes down to profit. I am sure they have a better idea of the technologies they have than any of us do (obviously) but once they start "disclosing" these things they might be in for a world of trouble. How can they profit off of a FREE energy? Any ideas?



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 05:22 PM
link   
reply to post by TheSparrowSings
 


Very good question Sparrow -- and apparently one that JP Morgan asked Tesla prior to tearing down his tower...

I think the profit is more in the technologies, Apple sure has sold a lot of iphones....GM has sold a ton of vehicles....GE has sold a ton of, well, everything almost.......



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join