posted on Mar, 2 2011 @ 09:54 AM
I'm very confused. And I certainly don't want to come off as an apologist for Qaddafi, but I have to mention that RT was reporting that the Russian
military via the space station has observed no such bombings.
So, someone is not being truthful. I think that an observation made is that there are no pictures anywhere online of the planes doing the bombing.
Also, all of the accounts of the bombing are second-hand. And the supposed first-hand accounts are by anonymous Libyans and Libyan-Americans who
always use a fictitious name out of fear of Qaddafi's forces going after their families.
So, my thought is that Qaddafi is a megalomaniac and brutal despot who will be ruthless towards those who go up against his power, but that also he is
in denial of how much he has lost in the last few weeks of change there (both geographically and credibility).
However, perhaps, for reasons of "national security" (in other words the 2% oil production in Libya) it behooves our government or certain special
interests within it to make Libya out to be quite a bit more on-the-edge or "tinderboxy" than it really is.
So, someone is stretching the truth and I honestly don't know what to believe, Putin's mouthpiece or the Pentagon's interconnected mouthpieces.
Also, I would add that the independent liberal media would be expected to parrot the outrage of attacks on peaceful protests, especially by war planes
and call for international intervention > UN > US > NATO.
Meanwhile, the corporatists and their so-called conservative sheep will toe the "invasion" line (read for, "circumvention" of the UN step that
would be necessary in the "liberal" logical viewpoint). We have to prevent Al-Jammiyah Al-Glennbeckistan Al-Kaliffah, right? Plus, the oil prices!
Any ideas about the absence of parity in the jets bombing the protests stories?