It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 48% of Likely U.S. Voters agree more with the Republican governor in his dispute with union workers. Thirty-eight percent (38%) agree more with the unionized public employees, while 14% are undecided.
The survey of 1,000 Adults was conducted on January 6-7, 2011 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.
Data for Rasmussen Reports survey research is collected using an automated polling methodology. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC.
Generally speaking, the automated survey process is identical to that of traditional, operator-assisted research firms such as Gallup, Harris, and Roper. However, automated polling systems use a single, digitally-recorded, voice to conduct the interview while traditional firms rely on phone banks, boiler rooms, and operator-assisted technology.
For tracking surveys such as the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll or the Rasmussen Consumer Index, the automated technology insures that every respondent hears exactly the same question, from the exact same voice, asked with the exact same inflection every single time.
All Rasmussen Reports' survey questions are digitally recorded and fed to a calling program that determines question order, branching options, and other factors. Calls are placed to randomly-selected phone numbers through a process that insures appropriate geographic representation. Typically, calls are placed from 5 pm to 9 pm local time during the week. Saturday calls are made from 11 am to 6 pm local time and Sunday calls from 1 pm to 9 pm local time.
After the calls are completed, the raw data is processed through a weighting program to insure that the sample reflects the overall population in terms of age, race, gender, political party, and other factors. The processing step is required because different segments of the population answer the phone in different ways. For example, women answer the phone more than men, older people are home more and answer more than younger people, and rural residents typically answer the phone more frequently than urban residents.
For surveys of all adults, the population targets are determined by census bureau data.
For political surveys, census bureau data provides a starting point and a series of screening questions are used to determine likely voters. The questions involve voting history, interest in the current campaign, and likely voting intentions.
Rasmussen Reports determines its partisan weighting targets through a dynamic weighting system that takes into account the state’s voting history, national trends, and recent polling in a particular state or geographic area.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 48% of Likely U.S. Voters agree more with the Republican governor in his dispute with union workers. Thirty-eight percent (38%) agree more with the unionized public employees, while 14% are undecided.
Originally posted by MindSpin
reply to post by SirMike
I would love to see the complete demographic break down, including how many republicans vs democrats were polled...but Mr. Rasmussen makes people buy a membership for that information (Only 19.95 per month or 199.95 per year ). I wonder why?edit on 21-2-2011 by MindSpin because: (no reason given)
Gee, I dont know, perhaps it has something to do with the fact that he has bills to pay?
Originally posted by MindSpin
No other polling company charges for their full information...it is freely available so people can see how the poll was conducted.
Here...I'll give you a little hint as to why Rasmussen does this. Is it easier to spin poll results by making your (biased) write up of the results public...or by making the raw data public???
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
Read that this morning.
Yeah. Made me wonder if those same Wisconsin residents were also against Wall Street and the government who robbed and wants to continue robbing the pension funds for these public sector employees like they robbed them for the private sector ones. Fair question. It's all in the presentation, isn't it, and what the easier target is, and it's easy to not think beyond the immediate pressing need (to balance a budget) and not care about why the people who made the bad decisions in government and on Wall Street that actually caused these crises aren't in jail or are still in office. And frankly, the narrow view here is beginning to not only frustrate but sicken me.
The people protesting the cuts are mentally unstable. They have an abnormality of the brain that allows them to believe that a government can spend more than it takes in forever without any consequences. They are like children that want to eat nothing but candy all day. Eventually, the mature adult has to step in and say "No". Because of this mental imbalance, these protesters are a danger not only to themselves but also the decent and civilized people that go to work everyday and whose taxes pay their bloated salaries. The governor is doing his job, standing up for the taxpaying citizens of his state instead of the parasitic union special interests. Unions are parasitic scum that need to be broken up and dissolved.
Originally posted by SirMike
reply to post by Dwigt
I live in Vernon Hills, just south of the Il/Wi border, and I am hearing the same thing from friends and family in Wisconsin. They are tired of subsidizing salaries and benefits that aren’t offered anywhere else in the private sector for comparable jobs.
I really thought there would be less hostility here at ATS about this issue, but I guess too many posters here are just as reliant on large heapings of gub’mint cheese as these Wisconsin state workers.
Originally posted by pthena
reply to post by mwfinad1211
Under Communism, the State acts as the agent of every part, Capital, Labor, Production, Regulation, Education, Defense. The idea that Labor(people) can organize outside of the direct unitary state control is abhorrent to Totalitarian Communism. Labor Unions offer the people a means to achieve the dignity of rising above serfdom without becoming serfs of the state.
...
Republican Agenda: Privative everything, Deregulate everything, Kill collective bargaining by workers aka people. Maximize profits for Capital. Reduce the people to serfdom. Result: Totalitarian Capitalist Regime, State exists to keep the top .5% on top. They call it Freedom. It's the freedom of Capital to maximize itself, at the expense of humanity.
I'm not absolving Dems of any of this, but it's apparent the direction the GOP has been taking for the last couple decades.
The New York Times accused Rasmussen Reports of lacing a recent survey on the Wisconsin protests with conservative bias, elevating longstanding critiques about the polling firm's credibility.
The survey, released Monday, asked four questions about the Wisconsin clash over Republican Gov. Scott Walker's budget plan, which would strip the collective bargaining rights of public employees and force them to pay more for benefits. It found that 48 percent of "likely voters" agreed with Walker, while 38 percent supported his opponents.
Nate Silver of the Times' FiveThirtyEight blog is a trusted polling expert who came to fame after correctly predicting the outcomes of 49 of 50 states in the 2008 election. In a Monday evening posting, he took issue with the manner in which several of Rasmussen's questions were asked, decreeing that they were designed to engender a pro-Walker bias.
Two of the questions, Silver wrote, misrepresented the nature of the opposition in a "blatant" attempt to diminish sympathy for them before asking the respondent whose side they were on. The penultimate question was "a talking point posed as a question," he declared.
The questions were about whether the respondent thinks public or private sector employees make more money, and whether "teachers, firemen and policemen" should be allowed to go on strike -- which is illegal in most places for uniformed services.
"Because of the problems with question design, my advice would be simply to disregard the Rasmussen Reports poll, and to view their work with extreme skepticism going forward," Silver concluded.
Rasmussen, fending off years of criticisms of harboring a Republican-leaning bias, is taken very seriously by the mainstream press. Its founder and president, Scott Rasmussen, has openly supported conservative causes and is a former writer for the conspiracy-minded website World Net Daily.