reply to post by youthsavior
I have examined this from both sides. And I have no proof on the skeptical side that this is a hoax!
Clearly your belief is getting in the way then because the photo's are a complete joke! The wedding cake base was proved to be dustbin lid. Exactly
the same size, lines and handle. Was that just a coincedence? I guess you will say yes
What many of you fail to realize is that people have seriously been threatening Billy's life for some time now... Why?? Because his case is too damn
He lives on a farm! If they wanted him dead, he would be dead. I mean, how hard would it be to kill him? Its BS!
People have been trying to debunk this case since day one and have made photo's, etc. to say that it's all fake. When you actually examine the real
evidence and not the fake and phony photo's you think are Meier's then you will realize, there's no hoaxing...
Did you look at the movie clip i posted? Thats just one of many that have perfectly replicated the photos and footage. I told you, you will never
change your mind! Why do you keep on saying they have not been debunked when they have?
If you please watch the video and watch the part where they do the photo analysis of his photo's you will understand where I'm coming from...
Science has proved that he didn't tamper with his photograph's...
I have watched the video. I am betting i know more about this case than you. You are clearly ignorant. You ask an expert now what they think of the
photo's and footage? Also, i would like to add that Mr horn has lied many times about people who have said this and that about the case, but i guess
you did not know that
No I am not. Because some of them have clearly been hoaxed, but not by him.
Oh dear! Thats why i can't win with people like you because as soon as something is proved fake with this case, you will say it was planted and not
done by meier. So sad
first of all lets this straight – just because there are a couple of questionable curious aspects does not and simply CANNOT in any way invalidate
the strentgth of the remaining overall vast amount of supportive evidence. In fact this is only to be expected – considering the sheer volume of
that evidence itself.
Oh come on! The only photo's that looked half decent were the first bunch. Then he got confident and thought he coulf get away with this and that lol
The footage can be debunked easily, and has been de-bunked easily.
Also the argument often put forward by skeptics – that if they think they have debunked one or two photos – then by extension of this that the
rest then must surely be fake – this very simply can NOT carry forward – owing again to the overwhelming impregnability (and irreproducibility!)
of that remaining volume of sheer hard pyhsical evidence.
Have you been reading what i have said. Look around the web. The footage has been de-bunked many times. Not just his photo's/video's but his
predictions are a complete joke too, as he only comes out with them after the event has happened. And the ones he has predicted, like ww3, have been
completly wrong. Now, what does that tell you?
on wedding cake – if one examines the video billy took (using a very early SABA brand of european camera) the zoom employed shows unquestionably
that we are dealing with a very very large object – that simply cannot be a trashcan – the forced perspective theories do not hold up here.
Again, a load of rubbish. Some replicated that footage, with the same camera, so, i don't know where you got that from, but i can guess
what happeded to these tree's? Thats right, the tree's don't even exist in the areas he too the footage. I wonder why?
on dean martin lookalike – if one is to examine carefully a photo of the woman in question – there are hugh facial discrepencies (eg. size of
forehead, cheekbones etc.) It requires bit of closer scrutiny – but once the realisation of this sets in – it starts to make sense that yes – an
image of this woman may surely have overlaid ON TOP OF whatever photo billy took of the original pleadian girl – and that really this is the only
real possibility – again as a result of the very perceivable and unquestionably facial incongruity that is made apparent under closer examination.
THerefore the conclusion that must surely be reached for the critical thinker is that indeed there must have had to have been tampering with billy’s
original photos as he took them.
I can't believe i am reading this! Its the same girl!!!! Even the same backround. You can't deny that, but then you do it again! If some comes along
that is de-bunkable, you say that billy was set up or something like that lol
I guess he was set up with the Dinosaur photo was a set up too, and he did not take the photo from a book?
on dino shot – if one looks more closely – its not really an exact match is it! therefore proving nothing
go to my youtube site listed above – and view the videos – ‘meier case reopened’ parts 1 and 2.
also there is a brand new film out – entitled ‘the silent revolution of truth’
also there is an entire free book online available for download entitled ‘ufo contact with the Pleiades’
Oh, the silent revolution of truth. The dvd that got Mr horn into a bit of trouble because he quoted experts that either said nothing, or mr Horn
changed what they said to make it pro meier. Don't even mention that man. He is a joke and a lier. For someone who has looked at both sides, you
don't know much
meier was able to accurately describe the exact nature of the chemical composition of jupiter’s ring before science got there.
No he did not! link
also he was able to accurately describe the nature of the atmosphere on venus beneath the dense cloud cover – once again before mainstream science
billy is for real….
and humans beings choose to ignore this at their absolute peril."
Lol yeah, because he was right about ww3 wasn't he lol. The sad fact is this, you are easily led, its as simple as that No matter what i throw at
you, you are not going t listen
and thats a shame bcause there are so many great cases out there. Cases like this makes the subject a joke!
This is the classic case of throwing the baby out with the bath water . Theres so much interesting stuff in the contact notes that any objective
researcher would hafta admit that :
A) Billy meiers is a super genius with an IQ of 170+ and a degree in astrophysics with inside information or.....
B)Billy meiers is telling the truth about his contacts
Sorry, but your posts does not make sense, and comes from someone who has not really looked into the case, well, not the skeptical side anyway. Why
does he need to have an IQ of 170 and a degree in astrophysics when most of the stuff he got was from books?