reply to post by Frankinmouse
Jay, I brought Korff into it because you cited his evidence in a previous post , I wasn't discussing Michael Horn, Horn is not Meier, Horn is nothing
to do with Meier apart from the fact that he promotes the case for his own reasons and lets be fair if you spend years researching something and spend
money making documentaries you should get your money back selling the dvd.
So what, are you telling me that Mr horn is not the official Michael Horn is the Authorized American Media Representative for the Billy Meier
Contacts? Im sorry, but you will find that he is. And you are right, he is a liar, just like Meier. Also, are you telling me that none of the money
that is made from thefly.com, does not go to meier?
Stephens and his team spent three years and thousands of dollars flying to switzerland in the 1970's to investigate Meier ( concluded it was real I
might add) then were chastised by the ufo community for trying to get some money back by releasing a book.
If i remember, Jim Dilettoso also thought the case was real after doing so called tests. Even he has said his tests were flawed, but he has had to
really because in the debates against korff, he always came off second best, but at least he has seen the light!
As for Stephens and his team, there investigation was flawed too. Also, how the hell could they not tell that some of the ufo's like the wedding cake
were small and close to the camera. That, you have to question!
Yes Michael Horn pisses people off and uses methods to promote the case that are sometimes suspect but again, Michael Horn is not Billy Meier, he
doesn't work for Meier, he doesn't get paid by Meier or FIGU. Meier has done nothing but write down the alleged contacts and other spiritual writings
for the last 30 years. He doesn't go on websites to defend himself, he doesn't do interviews, he doesn't accept random visitors anymore because of the
trouble the publicity has caused him over the years.He's not interested whether you believe him or not. People who promote the case are aside from the
evidence and Meier.
It's not Meiers fault if people go overboard trying to make a point in a world where people not only don't listen to an argument but fabricate their
own evidence to disprove something they can't explain.
Again, Michael Horn is the Authorized American Media Representative for the Billy Meier Contacts. And if he is so bad, then why do FIgu still link to
his site, and why do they say on the FIGU site that Michael Horn is the Authorized American Media Representative for the Billy Meier Contacts which
he has researched since 1979.
Surely they would want to distance themselves from such a person, right? Meier does not have to go on websites to defend himself. He knows the
gullible will always believe him and the BS excuses he has come out with when he has been caught out.
He has his little cult, and its alive and kicking, so he does not care.
By the way, Korff lied about almost everything on the art bell show, its fairly easy to sway people when you state something as absolute fact the
moment during an interview when you cannot confirm what someone is saying. Korff had his ass handed to him actually by Art Bell at a later date for
lying about Art Bell!
Of course the Meier believers are going to say he lied. They are not going to turn around and say he is telling the truth now
Also , your model tree theory comes originally from Korff who lied about Meier growing miniature trees on his grounds which is complete nonsence and
Derek Bart also admitted that the miniature tree theory is the weakest point in his argument against the Meir case.
Why is the miniature tree theory is the weakest point? It makes perfect sense why he would use miniature tree's, and also makes sense why these tree's
vanished. Again, this was mentioned to Meier, and again he comes out with a BS story, and you guys fall for it every single time!
I would ask people just to read Wendelles stephens original investigation report which extensively covers everything to do with the meier case and was
the only investigation to be actually on site with Meier during the contacts. Korff never even met Meier
And when was that investigation done? Thats right, in the 1970's. They said they tried to replicate the footage, but could not get it right. So, how
comes we can get people to replicate the photos using the same camera, and even using one arm and get it to look just like, if not better than Meiers
photos. Why is that?
And also, like i said before, how can they study some of the photos and realise that some of the photos show a small object close to the camera. Even
you said it looks like a small object, right?
The whole case is a complete scam worshiped by people who would pretty much fall for any brainwashing cult. Take "youthsavior" as a good example. Go
look at his post history, then come back and tell me what you think.
Its up to you if you want to believe this BS, but me, as someone who believes that some ufo's are complete unknowns and need further investigation,
will carry on looking into the cases that matter. Cases like this makes the subject a complete and utter joke!
And the people that follow this case like a religon, will never change their mind
edit on 30-3-2011 by Jay-morris because: (no reason given)