reply to post by Jay-morris
The material present in Meier's contact notes are present in a conversational format between him and alleged ET's & some info being addressed to
people of earth. Some of the information/events are already known to public/scientists, while some information present is only known to scientists as
they either are in theory phase or testing phase, while some information present is given especially as prophecies and predictions..some information
present has not yet come true..some info present cannot be verified as we either lack technology, info belongs to past or distant future or we lack
the necessary conceptual tools to understand....
Ok, if Meier can look into the future, how comes he has been wrong on many accations, and also many of his prediction cannot be verified date wise?
IIG explains this perfectly on their site.So, what are you saying, he is right sometimes? Are you saying that all his predictions can be verified at
the date he says?
What was he wrong on ?
Not all of his predictions can be verified as for verification we need either copyrighted documents, publication dates or confirmation from third
party that indeed Meier has given/sold them particular notes/book....There is ample corroborated data present in copyrighted documents that has come
If your interested we can talk on IIG's investigations too. Most of us blindly take in one what "skeptics" say..but let us be skeptical of what they
say, and investigate and put to test their theories.....
And do you believe him, considering we all know he faked his photos and his footage, what makes you think he has not lied about this?
Billy faking his footage/photos is not yet proven with enough evidence. Only theories are present that are incompatible and inconsistent with the
You still have not addressed the heads of state prediction. Will yoh admit you were wrong, and in fact, Meier was wrong?
Meier prophecised not predicted. Can you show me where Meier said WW III was predicted or fulfilled ?
It is you who is claiming that "Meier predicted WW III"...So you need to prove it ? If not let us not waste any more time on it and discuss other
Anyways, as the predictions hold no evidence whatsoever, lets move on to the vanishing ufo. Can you explain the reason why it looks so fake?
Any physical evidence can be nearly recreated, manipulated, destroyed, stolen...and so on. It is the prophecies and predictions(verifiable ones) that
are impossible for any person who even have unlimited resources(money, power, intelligence,..).
Vanishing UFO Footage
You must be talking about the video, shot at Berg-Rumlikon, June 14 1975, 10:40
We need to ask these questions first
1] Is there any original film of that footage ?
2] Has anyone scientifically analysed the original footage or first generation footage ?
3] Did they find any indications for a hoax(like splices in the film roll & other) ?
4] Any other pictures/footage of that beamship taken on that location/time ?
5] What kind of camera Meier used and also the camera settings for that shot ?
I would respond when i see your take on the footage from the evidence you gathered.
edit on 26-3-2011 by mahigitam because: add