Why Is the Military Creating an Army of Fake People on the Internet?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 20-2-2011 @ 09:41 PM by GLantern101
Why Is the Military Creating an Army of Fake People on the Internet?Here's a slight glimpse into the Air Force's cyber warfare efforts: a request for bids from last summer for "Persona Management Software," which would allow one person to command an army of fake online people.

From the request, posted on the Federal Business Opportunities website:

"Software will allow 10 personas per user, replete with background , history, supporting details, and cyber presences that are technically, culturally and geographacilly consistent. Individual applications will enable an operator to exercise a number of different online persons from the same workstation and without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries. Personas must be able to appear to originate in nearly any part of the world and can interact through conventional online services and social media platforms."

The request was for 50 licenses, which means the Air Force hoped to create up to 500 fake Internet people. The request was filled in June, which means these fake people could be roaming the 'net right now. According to the request, the software was to be deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Why? To secretly gather embarrassing party pics from Taliban solders' Facebook profiles? To swing Iraq newspaper polls about whether the U.S. is evil? May they'll help us beat out North Korea in eBay auctions for rogue nukes


gizmodo.com...#!5764551/why-is-the-military-creating-an-army-of-fake-people-on-the-internet

edit on 20-2-2011 by GLantern101 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-2-2011 @ 09:50 PM by apacheman
reply to post by GLantern101



Go into the Wisconsin teacher threads and check out the union bashers. I won't bias the issue by naming anyone in particular, just read with an eye to multis and decide for yourself.


reply posted on 20-2-2011 @ 10:17 PM by Clark Savage Jr.
reply to post by notsofast



500 fake people??? They should know any internet dating site has a million, lol
edit on 2/20/2011 by Clark Savage Jr. because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 21-2-2011 @ 05:57 AM by KindaGrayish
I've been reading ATS for some time now and I'm actually a little paranoid about joining and posting, but this particular thread struck a resonant chord within me as I happen to be a sports fan.


Well this practice and behavior is quite rampant amongst hype-based enterprises such as professional sports, and has been for a long, long time.

It's not the big boys like the Lakers or the Heat either, it is the businesses that are complacent with their profit margin despite their continued parading of a poor (losing) product.

A couple years ago, Raymond Ridder (PR director for the golden state warriors, NBA Basketball), took the fall for several personalities that popped up on different news sites and warriors forums to promote the team.

It was fairly obvious that it wasn't just Ridder, but he took the fall to ensure that everyone kept their jobs.

After that the team changed their employee internet policy to maintain the anonymity of their online agenda promoters. While the Warriors said that the incident was unfortunate they did not say that they would stop posting anonymously in fan forums and on news articles.

Hence it didn't end there. In fact the Golden State Warriors, and some NBA teams have expanded their operations. Vendors paid by the team and third party PR councils have embedded themselves deep within the fan forums and communities to exercise their message control at almost every turn. Almost to the point where certain discourse communities have been hijacked, complicitly or otherwise. Ask the right question or put management/ownership in a corner and the plants will be on you like a fly on doo doo.

Not to mention that the NBA polices wikipedia with a passion.

Also if you look at the sorry state of journalism you will notice a trend amongst journalists who are increasingly sacrificing accountability and honesty for access. Plus sports franchises aggressively enforce the insider/outsider paradigms.

Consumer efficacy within the mediascape is at an all-time low. Astroturfing law (a derivative of wire fraud) is relatively new (depending on how you view it) and is far from complete or comprehensive within the United States (only a few states have adopted laws against it). The odds against consumer/public protections in this regard are staggering. The money, willpower and infrastructure to stop the lies from just about any business or enterprise with the resources to deliver a message (and they can outsource too) are very few and far between. Modern boiler rooms are actually vast networks of contracted services.

The navigation of these morally and ethically corrupted hegelian dialectics is the reality for the plugged in public. As far as this relates to the government I have no idea what they are actually doing (although I'm sure they are doing), but from a consumer's perspective it is no bueno.
edit on 21-2-2011 by KindaGrayish because: (no reason given)
edit on 21-2-2011 by KindaGrayish because: (no reason given)
edit on 21-2-2011 by KindaGrayish because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^