It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bogomil
And exactly how do you explain that your mini-sermon isn't anything but fantasies taken from a book of fantasies?
I am sorry my friend, but I have said nothing wise here in this thread. The wisdom came from within the Brother who I was conversing with. He spoke the truth that we are all equally worthy from his own heart and his own mind. He is the wiseman in this thread.
And in any case, it must be both a great consolation and justification to you, that there have been ideologies even more insane than invasive christianity (though they were stopped, while we still have extremist christians around).
In the name of WHAT atheism? You're inventing things now to fit with your predetermined answers.
I'm quite sure, that these "humans" involved in religious atrocities must have been influenced by a book filled with commands of genocide, stoning, slavery etc.
Originally posted by WhizPhiz
After some time to think, here's one last thing I would like to discuss with you IAMIAM. You were trying to tell me that my thoughts and desires aren't really generated by my own being, my own consciousness, but in fact are generated by the consciousness of God, which is inside us all, correct?
Originally posted by WhizPhiz
So would that not mean, my "wisdom came from within"? Wouldn't that mean everything I've said here is the word of God? What I'm getting at is, how can every single person on Earth be correct about what they believe? What I've said here are my thoughts, and regardless of what you would claim, what you have said here are the result of your personal beliefs and values. And when it comes right down to it, if Jesus were real, I'm sure he could find faults in things that you've said, as well as things I have said. No one is perfect, and no one ever will be.
Originally posted by WhizPhiz
And so following that line of logic, I think it's clear we can each generate our own independent thoughts, whether we are connected to God or not. It's also clear that some one has to be wrong, as not every single religion can be right can it? How can you even be 100% sure Christianity is the correct one? It seems very far from the truth IMO, and I think even you would agree with that since they rely heavily on the old testament. There isn't a single real religion on this planet, just lies sprinkled with a little bit of truth as always. It's not hard to see this saddening reality, and the damage such false religions have caused to society.
Yes, thanks for answering all my questions. I enjoyed the discussion and found it quite a good learning experience. I have a feeling this wont be our last discussion. I'll see you around.
Does this make sense to you?
Yes, you can say, that it was done in 'the name of Stalin or Mao', but how do you make the transition from that to 'the name of secularism and atheism?' Stalin and Mao were communists. What has that to do with atheism and secularism.
Emphasis added.
"You know, they are fooling us, there is no God...all this talk about God is sheer nonsense" in E. Yaroslavsky, Landmarks in the Life of Stalin, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow 1940
The Soviet Union was the first state to have as an ideological objective the elimination of religion. Toward that end, the Communist regime confiscated church property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in the schools. Actions toward particular religions, however, were determined by State interests, and most organized religions were never outlawed. Orthodox priests and believers were variously tortured, sent to prison camps, labour camps or mental hospitals, and executed.[19][20] Many Orthodox (along with people of other faiths) were also subjected to psychological punishment or torture and mind control experimentation in order to force them give up their religious convictions.[21][22]
Thousands of churches and monasteries were taken over by the government and either destroyed or converted to secular use. It was impossible to build new churches. Practising Orthodox Christians were restricted from prominent careers and membership in communist organizations (the party, the Komsomol). Anti-religious propaganda was openly sponsored and encouraged by the government, which the Church was not given an opportunity to publicly respond to. The government youth organization, the Komsomol, encouraged its members to vandalize Orthodox Churches and harass worshippers. Seminaries were closed down, and the church was restricted from using the press.
The main target of the anti-religious campaign in the 1920s and 1930s was the Russian Orthodox Church, which had the largest number of faithful. Nearly all of its clergy, and many of its believers, were shot or sent to labor camps. Theological schools were closed, and church publications were prohibited.
The sixth sector of the OGPU, led by Yevgeny Tuchkov, began aggressively arresting and executing bishops, priests, and devout worshippers, such as Metropolitan Veniamin in Petrograd in 1922 for refusing to accede to the demand to hand in church valuables (including sacred relics). In the period between 1927 and 1940, the number of Orthodox Churches in the Russian Republic fell from 29,584 to less than 500. Between 1917 and 1935, 130,000 Orthodox priests were arrested. Of these, 95,000 were put to death. Many thousands of victims of persecution became recognized in a special canon of saints known as the "new martyrs and confessors of Russia".
You yourself are doing EXACTLY, what you initially protested against. By ignoring the factual situation and by creating false categories, you've made your own 'mantra' for propagandistic purposes.
I find hypocrisy the most suitable word for your method, and it doesn't give you much credibility.
The League was a "nominally independent organization established by the Communist Party to promote atheism." It published newspapers, journals, and other materials that lampooned religion; it sponsored lectures and films; it organized demonstrations and parades; it set up antireligious museums; and it led a concerted effort to persuade Soviet citizens that religious beliefs and practices were "wrong" and harmful, and that good citizens ought to embrace a scientific, atheistic worldview.[5]
I am myself liberal, for democracy, politically slightly right, strongly supporting secular society, non-atheist and I am in basic attitudes a typical representative of at least some 400 million europeans, who hover around a statistical 'middle'. How do you fit this into your pre-arranged 'category'?
Your categorization is made according to extremist christian procedure: First the predetermined 'answer', then adapting 'facts' to suit this answer. In reality there are christian communists, communistic christians, atheist communists, atheist liberals, atheist conservatives, secular religionists...
Originally posted by bogomil
Very elegant. I very much appreciate this kind of humour, which I'm sure was intentional. If you hadn't been so stuck in your bhakti love-absolute, you could have made a good zen-buddhist.
Originally posted by bogomil
What happened? Did you screw up the possibilities, so your present 'karma' is being relegated to a one-perspective option?