It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread665007/pg1#pid10613410]post by
I am not excusing the actions of some Police who do go overboard, but at the same time I dont think people should be placing us all into the same category.
Originally posted by 1SawSomeThings
Who are "These people", those who dare to video themselves or some stranger (78 year old grandma for instance) getting manhandled, stomped, tasered, or shot and killed? Why the threatening language here?
Originally posted by 1SawSomeThings
30+ years ago, getting out was seen as the right and courteous thing to do. Officer can see you, and that you're not armed and not hiding anything. Nowadays you guys are so wound up, you don't know what you want. Officers always ask for citizens to get out anyway, so where does the threat issue apply here?
Originally posted by 1SawSomeThings
Officers being videotaped should not cause any concern for you. Citizens expect to be videotaped on every stop/detainment, by dashcams and on-person cameras, and at every store, stop light and more. What's the difference here? Safety?
Originally posted by 1SawSomeThings
What about all the innocent citizens shot while reaching for the seatbelt once some steroid enhanced PTSD adrenalized storm trooper orders them out of the vehicle. Don't agree? google it.
edit on 20-2-2011 by 1SawSomeThings because: added info
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Honestly, I think you are likely a good person. I see the way you interact with people here, and note your intellectualism as a positive trait. Would that other cops were like that.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
problem is, how many "laws" do you enforce that have no victim? That are a waste of your time? And, though that enforcement, creates a greater danger for yourself?
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
You have to understand that, as a person whose job it is to limit the freedom of a citizen, people are not going to like you.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Just about every person has a horror story about a cop. And you are not like the folks at McDonalds. When that horror story includes a cop, the citizens rights, reputation, and freedom is put in danger (not to mention life). it is a humiliating event that creates actual trauma. I had an incident go bad enough that i would have a panic attack every time i drove past an officer. sometimes i would have to pull over and pull myself together. After a couple of years i got better. That officer was demoted over it, and eventually fired. If i ever see him again, i will not allow him to walk away. It is best that he no longer lives around here.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
you are a good man. you should find another profession. because of my own experiences, it is impossible for me to have a positive opinion on LEO's. The position corrupts the evil hearts of men far too easily.edit on 20-2-2011 by bigfatfurrytexan because: (no reason given)
I would strongly urge people NOT to get out of your vehicle on a traffic stop to record whats going on. Its even more dangerous with a cell phone being pointed towards the officers:
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by Xcathdra
First of all most people know not to interfere with the officer while taping them. Even if they're dealing with you. You have a right to ask questions but you also have to co-operate within the law. Second that whole idea that cell phone guns are a danger to officers is complete bs. Even if that were true then any item pretty much would be in question. Pens, cameras, umbrellas you name it. Has there ever even been even a single case where officers are threatened or engaged with a cell phone gun?
Originally posted by whaaa
Perhaps if the good LEOs didn't adhere to the "Blue Code" and protect the corrupt and brutal in your ranks the attitude would change to respect rather than disgust at the actions of the few.
Originally posted by whaaa
Institute citizen review boards rather than strictly "internal investigations" that usually result in no punishment or a mild slap on the wrist. Anything less and the problems are going to just get worse for all concerned.
Originally posted by whaaa
And I'd like to add that LEOs should be dismissed immediately for steroid use.
www.aolnews.com...
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Of course you wouldn't, but what you don't quite grasp as an armed henchmen of the state, is that you are in essence only that, an armed henchmen of the state.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Ultimately in a state that employs armed henchmen in a totaltarian society with too many tyranical laws, the only thing that the armed hench man can do is use their arms and brute force to make people comply.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
The only thing the people can do is to stop complying in a let the chips fall where they may encounter designed to do what the state refuses to do, and that's curtail the enforcement of unjust and tyranical laws and the armed henchmen that enforce them.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
So it's just as easy to offer you the advice to quit your job, find honest employment, to stop using the one act of kindness where you are actually serving the people in some capacity as an excuse for the other 9 acts where you are harming the people only to enrich the state.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Believe it or not ultimately common law favors the citizen acting against illegal search and siesure and kidnapping by armed henchmen of the state where they can't establish the legality of their actions.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by whaaa
Perhaps if the good LEOs didn't adhere to the "Blue Code" and protect the corrupt and brutal in your ranks the attitude would change to respect rather than disgust at the actions of the few.
The Blue Line you are referring to is not as prominent as you make it out to be. It is the exception and not the norm and news coverage bears that out..
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Fair enough...and i don't see you as being preachy.
FWIW, i just want to get a chance to break his nose. Nothing more. I am a "forgive and forget" kind of guy. But with his inappropriate actions he left my oldest son with a horrible memory of his dad failing him. I can never have a chance to repair that. I take my role of "dad" more seriously than anything else in life, and just thinking about that 1 time that I let my son down because of that cop makes "forgiving" impossible.
I don't take it out on all cops. i just keep my distance. that one instance taught me that it is better to just keep my distance than to rely on being a good citizen or a righteous man. Funny thing is, i sit on a few Boards of Directors with local law enforcement and attorneys/judges. I have to be around them all the time nowadays, and i have the reputation behind me that what happened 15 years ago would never happen today. Funny thing is, i am not a different person. I was no more righteous at that time than now.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
So because Q gave M a lipstick with a blade in it, in a James Bond movie, all lipstick should now be confiscated because the police saw the move and got nightmares.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
The problem is the training videos that are often made by private security firms indoctrinating the armed henchmen of the state into a cult of fear, where they are purposefully made to be frightened of the very people they are meant to protect and serve, to instead just serve a heirarchy that makes one law after another to impoverish and deminish the people in their person.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Excellent, excellent, you have established that the police 'imagine' they need to be afraid of lipstick!
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Because someone made a movie telling them they should be, someone who got paid to make it by a out of control bankrupt government that no longer abides by the will of the people, and needs a layer of defense between them and the people in the form of armed henchmen they brainwash into fearing the people.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Of course the state never misses an opportunity to brainwash the people to fear the henchmen either in that age old game of divide and conquer and use the masses to keep the masses themselves down.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
And to think you imagine you are being paid to give advice!
Oh boy.
edit on 20/2/11 by ProtoplasmicTraveler because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by whaaa
I am not going to engage in a tit for tat with you on this topic. As you state its my opinion, and I state its your opinion. Any info I rpovide will be dismissed by you,