It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Koition
About "Democrat" and "Republican", here's something intersting... look back at some of your most recent elections.
2004 - W (alleged Mason and Skull and Bones) vs. Kerry, (alleged Mason and Skull and Bones).
2000 - W (alleged Mason and Skull and Bones) vs. Gore (high level Freemason)
1996 - Clinton (Demolay member/sponsored by Masons) vs Bob Dole (high level Mason)
1992 - Bush Sr. (Skull/Bones and Mason) vs Clinton (Demolay)
Every damned living president lined up behind Bush and Clinton pro NAFTA. We must keep that in mind. There is only one political party in this country. And the "party" is a frat run "kegger" and you're not getting in! - Hemisphere
I think deep down we all know that the TRUTH, the right way is somewhere in between. - Koition
If we want to compare ourselves to "heaven" we MUST compare ourselves to very economically competitive/stable countries with higher levels of freedom, health, equality, quality of life, happiness, environmental standards, workers rights, vacation time, access to health-care/higher-education, etc. than even we have in the United States.
We MUST look towards countries like Germany, Canada, France, Norway, Sweden, Finland, etc.
These are examples of SOCIAL DEMOCRACIES. They are essentially the MOST MATURE, intelligent, and beneficial governments on the planet thus far. And we really must look towards the most shining examples available.
Countries like the Scandinavian countries have employed FANTASTIC levels of freedom/democracy with FANTASTIC workers rights/environmental laws, FANTASTIC economic stability and FANTASTIC benefits for its citizenry.
Can this be applied and scaled up 100% to America? Of course not perfectly.
HOWEVER, there are ABSOLUTELY improvements we can make while looking to these countries as a guide.
We have NO excuses anymore... America is the only 1st world country without many of the humanitarian, economic, environmental, scientific, and socio-political advances of other 1st world countries.
We are a strange mix of freedom/opportunity, the ILLUSION of freedom/opportunity, and extreme INVASIONS of freedom/opportunity. The future will change no matter what, it's our choice whether we foster/support/fight for REAL freedom/opportunity or let the illusions and fears combine into propaganda that ends up screwing over the slave class more than helping us.
The other thing that was not mentioned regarding those European socialist nations is that they are currently being overrun by immigrants from their southern borders.
Originally posted by reluctantpawn
The issue I have with unionized govt workers is this. You work for the people that pay taxes. You do not work for a for profit corporation. When the taxpayer [that is me] runs out of money by losing his job, there is no one to pay taxes. Since no one can pay their fair share of taxes govt spending must be cut. Govt cuts spending by cutting pay and benefits to balance the budget.
reluctantpawn
Originally posted by Koition
Hemi -
"All the smaller conspiracies you hear about are part of a huge, unknown conspiracy." - Unknown
Who's menevolent and who's benevolent...? I'm still in the mist of it... Frankly, "both" sides (if two exist) are hoarding secrets and knowledge that can release us from this darkness. To hell with them both...
Originally posted by David9176
reply to post by DerepentLEstranger
Corporations own both parties (as many know here already). Clinton was the first corporate Dem elected in my lifetime. (A Blue Dog Democrat...which is really a Corporate Democrat) There are a few on both sides who aren't bought...but that's made completely irrelevant as they are severely outnumbered.
I keep watching domino after domino fall as the middle class continues to be destroyed. It's nearly endgame now.
Once the unions are gone it's over. maybe it has to happen for things to actually change. I don't know....but I don't think what is happening can be stopped.
A corporation has more rights than an American citizen....let alone a union worker or any other person in the workforce.
What amazed me....70,000 people can rally to fight for their standard of living and they get the middle finger...a corporation sends a few lobbyists and THEY GET WHATEVER THE HELL THEY WANT.
edit on 19-2-2011 by David9176 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Yes that's exactly the case with the million T Partiers who descended on DC and Pelosi et al still rammed that socialist hc down everyone's throats
A huge share of the nation's economic growth over the past 30 years has gone to the top one-hundredth of one percent, who now make an average of $27 million per household. The average income for the bottom 90 percent of us? $31,244.
Note: The 2007 data (the most current) doesn't reflect the impact of the housing market crash. In 2007, the bottom 60% of Americans had 65% of their net worth tied up in their homes. The top 1%, in contrast, had just 10%. The housing crisis has no doubt further swelled the share of total net worth held by the superrich.
A Harvard business prof and a behavioral economist recently asked more than 5,000 Americans how they thought wealth is distributed in the United States. Most thought that it’s more balanced than it actually is. Asked to choose their ideal distribution of wealth, 92% picked one that was even more equitable.
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by Hemisphere
The middle class is not being squeezed by fellow members of the middle class, they are being squeezed by the corporate class:
motherjones.com... rica-chart-graph
A huge share of the nation's economic growth over the past 30 years has gone to the top one-hundredth of one percent, who now make an average of $27 million per household. The average income for the bottom 90 percent of us? $31,244.
Note: The 2007 data (the most current) doesn't reflect the impact of the housing market crash. In 2007, the bottom 60% of Americans had 65% of their net worth tied up in their homes. The top 1%, in contrast, had just 10%. The housing crisis has no doubt further swelled the share of total net worth held by the superrich.
A Harvard business prof and a behavioral economist recently asked more than 5,000 Americans how they thought wealth is distributed in the United States. Most thought that it’s more balanced than it actually is. Asked to choose their ideal distribution of wealth, 92% picked one that was even more equitable.
Follow the link to see the charts that I pulled these captions from, then try to justify your claim that the middle class is squeezing itself into bankruptcy.
The idea is disengenuous at best, blatant class warfare at worst.
If Walker were not a corrupt criminal he'd actually be working to bring jobs to his state to improve the economy rather than elimante jobs to destroy it so his keepers can profit.
The older I get the obvious it is that at the higher levels Republicans and Democrats are guilty of treason.
If Walker succeeds I will boycott anything produced in Wisconsin, and recommend that all fair-minded people join me, since at that point Wisconsin will be nothing more than a feeding station for the rich. If it hurts common Wisconsites, then they can change their ways or suffer for their beliefs which I don't share.
I sure hope that if he breaks the unions, all the unions members go on strike or leave the state entirely to its own devices and let the people who wish to be feudal serfs stay.edit on 25-2-2011 by apacheman because: (no reason given)