It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
really??? for detroit,. it had nothing to do with corporations moving their factories to mexico with GATT and NAFTA trade agreement help, written primarily by the BUSINESS ROUND TABLE (a small cauldron of business CEO's that meet with the president in washington)????
it's those evil democrats and liberals that picked up and moved the jobs away....
simple question for you...who has benefited the most financially in america?
the executives and shareholders of corporations?...or the average wage earner?....
...they are simply unpatriotic and un-american, they want america to turn into another 3rd-world country, with a few rich at the top, with the rest of us just barely surviving.
Originally posted by ClintK
Folks, I've gotta go. Wifey wants me to run some errands with her. Sorry. I'll try to check in tomorrow. In the mean time, conservatives should feel free to label me, because they like that and somehow feel it has argumentative value. Label away!!
I absolutely agree. Too big to fail was and still is a travesty. These companies should have went bankrupt. Tariffs need to be reinstated to compensate for the labor and legal inequities between nations. Unions need to be more reasonable and not try to get the sky and the moon. Most importantly, the federal government needs to get out of the damn way.
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by jdub297
Where's the taxpayer return on investment for business tax breaks?
I've yet to see where a tax break for business resulted in higher overall tax revenues to pay for them.
Businesses that refuse to hire locally, that refuse to pay a living wage, and still pay executive bonusses are stealing from the public with every tax break their donations buy.
Originally posted by Alxandro
Here are a few more things you should know about the uprising.
Them teachers love to pollute.
...and they can't spell worth a crap.
Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by jimmyx
If you really believe that the evil cabal behind GATT and NAFTA bears the largest share of responsibility, then you need to redirect your volley of indignation:
really??? for detroit,. it had nothing to do with corporations moving their factories to mexico with GATT and NAFTA trade agreement help, written primarily by the BUSINESS ROUND TABLE (a small cauldron of business CEO's that meet with the president in washington)????
It was the Clinton Administration that successfully pushed through, and won endorsement from Democratic leaders in Congress for, both the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1994) and the North America Free Trade Agreement (1994).
It was also during the Clinton administration and the enactment of the Telecommunications Act that the "tech bubble" generated unbelievable paper wealth for young, mostly Democrat entrepreneurs. This was the beginning of the really large shift of wealth from productive investment to the pockets of the techies. When the "bubble" burst (again, during the Clinton administration), it was the working people, with their money in 401ks and IRAs that saw their wealth and savings decimated.
Blame "conservatives" all you want, as most progressive lackeys do, regardless of facts.
The rest of us will stick with the truth and facts.
it's those evil democrats and liberals that picked up and moved the jobs away....
Although you were attempting sarcasm, you are correct!
simple question for you...who has benefited the most financially in america?
the executives and shareholders of corporations?...or the average wage earner?....
You mean like (Democrat/Progressive) Bill Gates? Or (Democrat supporting) Goldman Sachs? (where most of Obama's financial inner-circle came from)
Or the(staunchly pro-Obama, and pro democrat) Google Founders?
Or the recipients of HUGE government bailouts and million-dollar CEO bonuses like GE (Obama's chief financial advisor), Ford (CEO selected by Obama administration) or Chrysler (teachers, police and firefighters' union pension investments illegally wiped out during Obama-staged bankruptcy)?
Maybe you'd like to consider the affiliations of some of the highest-compensated CEOs and investors, like the Kerrys, the Rockefellers, George Soros --democrat/liberals all!
...they are simply unpatriotic and un-american, they want america to turn into another 3rd-world country, with a few rich at the top, with the rest of us just barely surviving.
If you mean the current administration, with their secretly-assessed carbon taxes, I guess you are right. Just look at what his "czars" want: socialism (Carol Browner), de-development and global re-distribution of wealth (John Holdren), or European-style energy prices (Henry Chu).
These are the same men and women who worked from 2009 to February 2010 to develop a "Social Cost of Carbon" to factor into current and future development and production (presently adding about $.20/gallon to fuel, at $21 to $43/ton of carbon)Obama's secret carbon tax
deny ignorance
jw
HOWEVER, so long as the system exists, unions are sort of a necessary evil so that AT LEAST the working class can have their own bully ready to fight the BIGGER bullies in government and business.
Big business outsources BECAUSE other countries have TERRIBLE standards for workers, the environment, consumers, and so on.
This is NOT a model to emulate!!! China is a TERRIBLE model for our country... it embodies the WORST of Communism combined with the WORST of Capitalism.
Originally posted by CuriousObserver
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but don't workers give up part of their pay in hopes that the money will go to a retirement fund, isn't that money something that they already earned and saved?
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
One (rhetorical) question I have is...IS THIS HOW THE STATE'S LOSE THEIR SOVEREIGNTY TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (go bankrupt then get conditionally bailed out)??
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by jdub297
Where's the taxpayer return on investment for business tax breaks?
I've yet to see where a tax break for business resulted in higher overall tax revenues to pay for them.
Businesses that refuse to hire locally, that refuse to pay a living wage, and still pay executive bonusses are stealing from the public with every tax break their donations buy.
www.postcrescent.com... xzz1EYphl2vX
Even though the tax cut bill he signed Monday and other agenda have garnered bipartisan support, Democratic critics say much of what Walker is doing is more symbolic than substantive.
(That is, not really making much of an impact either way.)
For example, only $1 million in tax breaks is expected to be distributed to qualifying businesses that relocate to Wisconsin under the bill Walker signed. Another tax cut Walker is backing that's tied to every new job created would come with a tax benefit of only between $90 and $315 per job.
Sometimes, just appearing to be "business friendly" can make the determination about where a business relocates or expands. Walker argues the changes will improve the state's business climate.
The $1 million tax cut bill he signed Monday takes effect this tax year and affects taxes due in 2012. Companies that have not operated in the state for two years could essentially get their corporate and personal income tax obligation in Wisconsin erased for a two-year period. At least 51 percent of the workforce's payroll, or at least $200,000 in wages, must be paid to the workers in Wisconsin to qualify.
I absolutely agree. Too big to fail was and still is a travesty.
Absolutely!
These companies should have went bankrupt.
Tariffs need to be reinstated to compensate for the labor and legal inequities between nations.
Unions need to be more reasonable and not try to get the sky and the moon. Most importantly, the federal government needs to get out of the damn way.
Originally posted by jdub297
Blame "conservatives" all you want, as most progressive lackeys do, regardless of facts.
The rest of us will stick with the truth and facts.
it's those evil democrats and liberals that picked up and moved the jobs away....
Although you were attempting sarcasm, you are correct!
NAYs ---38
Akaka (D-HI)
Boxer (D-CA)
Bryan (D-NV)
Burns (R-MT)
Byrd (D-WV)
Campbell (D-CO)
Cohen (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Craig (R-ID)
D'Amato (R-NY)
Exon (D-NE)
Faircloth (R-NC)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Ford (D-KY)
Glenn (D-OH)
Heflin (D-AL)
Helms (R-NC)
Hollings (D-SC)
Inouye (D-HI)
Kempthorne (R-ID)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Levin (D-MI)
Metzenbaum (D-OH)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Moynihan (D-NY)
Reid (D-NV)
Riegle (D-MI)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Sasser (D-TN)
Shelby (D-AL)
Smith (R-NH)
Stevens (R-AK)
Thurmond (R-SC)
Wellstone (D-MN)
Wofford (D-PA)
... And as a general rule of political thumb- Republicans represent big business/banking FAR more than Democrats do... however Democrats are ONLY the lesser evil and are absolutely guilty of coddling the corporatist/plutocratic state of society.
Also... you've inserted paranoia about a carbon-tax.
First of all, there is nothing to really fear in a carbon tax except higher prices.
Unless you consider that they have driven their respective economies over a cliff.
Other countries have implemented carbon taxes WITHOUT tyranny upon their citizenry.
There isn't some worldwide conspiracy to tax the air we breathe... that's insane both to suggest and also insane to implement, it would never fly.
Also, carbon taxes are actually EFFECTIVE but are NOT the answer to our AGW problems.
We must also keep in mind that Americans pay PIDDLE for petrol compared to the rest of the world (except perhaps Iraqis or Saudis).
Actually, the task force had a range in from which to choose for the SCC; they settled on the one in the middle.
The amount of money we pay also DOES NOT take into account the full costs of petroleum.
The bottom line is- and I think we can all agree- that we must stop the rampant corporatism in our society and force the will of the people back into the vast majority of our government's agenda.
Originally posted by mishigas
I had to laugh at the last photo...is this an example of a union teacher's spelling ability?