Have I missed something?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 19-2-2011 @ 10:37 AM by donatellanator
I need some non-conspiracy insight here on this piece I just watched/read.


MARK SHIELDS: I think, first of all, that you have a choice. You can be a strong speaker. Nancy Pelosi was a strong speaker. Newt Gingrich was a strong speaker. And that is, you have a very tightly controlled legislative forum and very few amendments even entertained.

And what you put together, and as we have in recent years, is two armies in the House of Representatives. You've got the Democratic army and the Republican army. And if you have got more Democrats, you can get all your army to vote for it, and the Republican votes against it, and you pass it.

What we saw this week was, all of the sudden, with the F-35 engine vote, 100 Democrats, more than 100 Democrats and more than 100 Republicans voting for it. I mean, that's...

JIM LEHRER: That's the new world order, isn't it?

MARK SHIELDS: That was the new world order.

JIM LEHRER: Yes.


www.pbs.org...

They mention new world order, but in a sense that it is understood what is meant. Have I missed something? Is there a generalized definition beyond conpiracy? Is it where both (all) parties work together--instead of being combative for the sake of fighting--to get things done? That's the context I take from the article.

I think NWO may have started as a good concept (Has anyone read "The Anatomy of Peace" by Emery Reeves?) and has been morphed by greed and lust for control and power over time. I know a lot of background on different theories, so I don't need that lesson... but if anyone has any opinions I'd love to hear them.

Thanks and as always POWER to the PEOPLE!


reply posted on 19-2-2011 @ 12:34 PM by rogerstigers
"The term "new world order" has been used to refer to any new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power. ..."

en.wikipedia.org...(politics)

My guess is that there is very little differance between the CT version of NWO and the mainstream version... just a point of view thing. The mainstream version views it as a political paradigm of unity in politics where everyone marches in lockstep with the leadership. The CT version views it as a paradigm of facism and iron fist control over all aspects of a citizen's daily life..

That's my take on it at least.

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



A Dictator Is The Solution.
  Posted 2 days ago with 15 member flags
Why the need for Constant Growth?
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
Real Socialists. The Friends Of The Conservatives.
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
On What Date Did Human Freedom End?
  Posted 16 days ago with 5 member flags
So, is it really a female choice?
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags