Why humans will never colonize space, page 9
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 21-5-2011 @ 02:14 AM by sugarcookie1
Originally posted by wlasikiewicz
reply to
post by sugarcookie1



Wow that just goes to show how nasa can waste money on silly things like that.

They must have more important missions on the cards than this, like "Are We Alone?"


I sure dont think were alone..I think they should be looking more at things like our oceans and our planet and how to clean it up..


reply posted on 24-6-2011 @ 12:51 PM by Angelic Resurrection
reply to post by caladonea



I'm inclined to believe you, as in the black ops, there certainly is lot of stuff that
no one has heard about.
It would be good if you could post some sort of a sketch of these strange aircraft.
Just Curious. Thanks


reply posted on 4-7-2011 @ 11:38 PM by Mapkar
reply to post by sugarcookie1



Even IF we could manage to procreate away from Earth, I see us having other problems in colonizing space. I look at the fictional worlds of Halo, Red Faction, Dune, Coyote, and of course others, I see wonderful opportunity, spectacular possibilities, and hope that stuff would all be possible. However, even if we ever could have the super scientific awesome technology to do great stuff (Which I know is hardly possible) we couldn't accomplish anything great. Why? Because the fundamental violent nature of humanity would ruin it all. Someone, somewhere, will want to destroy everything we work for in colonizing space. There's a movie that I forget the name of where we build a weird rotating device that costs a ridiculous amount of money, it's supposed to help us travel through space at a super fast speed, right before it's launched it's blown up. I can totally see something like that happening in reality if we were ever able to accomplish something great technologically.

Whilst baby making is a huge problem in space apparently, I think dealing with violence and destructive tendencies inherent with humanity would be another hurdle we'd have to hop over.


reply posted on 4-7-2011 @ 11:39 PM by Mapkar
reply to post by Tearman



Why would we "colonize" if it were only for machines in the first place?

Are you suggesting they'd do the hard work to make things livable for humans to eventually settle? That'd make more sense to me.


reply posted on 6-7-2011 @ 10:05 PM by Tearman
Originally posted by Mapkar
reply to
post by Tearman



Why would we "colonize" if it were only for machines in the first place?

Are you suggesting they'd do the hard work to make things livable for humans to eventually settle? That'd make more sense to me.
Well sure machines could terraform a planet and then build humans there if for some reason they were motivated to do so. Though I think before this scenario could become possible, machines would have advanced to the point that our civilization will have basically transformed into a machine civilization rather than a human one. So it seems more likely to me that the machines will colonize new planets so that machines may "live" there, rather than humans. I'm sure they will have inherited many aspects of our civilization, so you could say those machines are our decedents, from a certain point of view.


edit on 6-7-2011 by Tearman because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 24-10-2011 @ 03:58 PM by sugarcookie1
reply to post by NightGypsy



I haven't checked this thread in ages..Trojan Condoms that can deflect radiation that was a hoot! Peace,sugarcookie1
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^