It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Majestic Lumen
reply to post by Looking_Glass
It appears the terrorists beat him because he was exercizing his freedoms, which the terrorists hate, and it is why the terrorists are trying to eliminate our freedoms, except, the real terrorists are not arab extremists, they are suit wearing political figures, who claim to represent the American people.
People are watching, reading, voting, yet unwilling to speak up against a thuggish, manipulative, lying administration.
I'm pretty sure the mods don't really care when bad language is used in the relevant context in a serious manner. But when the bad language is used to be hateful and insulting, it will be removed for obvious reasons. If this man was insulting people and acting out of line, then I can see a reason for removing him, but he was protesting peacefully and they still felt it necessary to remove him. That's just flat out wrong and shows just how retarded Clinton and her goons are. It's laughable really, you Americans are screwed, because I know you guys will never take serious action against these political terrorists, you're all too scared and/or ignorant, they have you by the balls and they are going to keep degrading and suppressing your freedoms until you have nothing left. Have fun with that.
You just had to say "bullbleep". Why? Because they would have removed your post. This is America?
Well...I'm gonna play devil's advocate here.
There are other people there attending this speech...they are all sitting down. Yes, standing up and turning your back on the speaker is a swell form of peaceful protest...but what about the people sitting behind this man? Do they not deserve to view this speech without being obstructed by this man?...