reply to post by Schaden
Please look up the definition of filibuster as it in no way involves running and hiding and refusing to go to work.
Originally posted by inforeal
reply to post by beezzer
No your simplistic scenario is wrong.
If the unions loose then the rich will have more power to buy Republican and Tea Party candidates, and the unions will have less power to oppose the super-rich and their agenda.
Eventually, unless you are one of the millionaires or billionaires, this tyranny will ruin your life and the life of your children
Originally posted by inforeal
reply to post by green-tree
That’s called fascism. The government and capitalists combining to rule.
The Republican party use to be somewhat human. Indeed they use to support unions and even Richard Nixon had a national health care plan for ALL Americans.
But today’s Republican Party is so radical right–wing that they resemble Nazis and fascists, and no longer Americans who believe in the constitution or what is says about the general welfare.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by green-tree
So you don't think the State should have the power to compel people to do things they don't want to do?
Is that what you are saying?
Originally posted by whatukno
Yea, I am not a big fan of Unions at the State or Federal government level, I don't think that's right. Why should my tax money go to pay for Union Arbitration?
I think that all government jobs should be minimum wage jobs with no benefits.