It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by Califemme
Siiigh.
Um, lawyers and high-level staff are precisely who handles such negotiations now. They do what they are told to do by their bosses, because it's their job to do so. Who do you think does?
Your suggestion that a single employee hire a lawyer is acceptable as long as you can explain exactly, with links, where someone who makes minimum wage is going to find a private lawyer to represent them. Where do yuo think the hourly wage floor would be to be able to hire someone who charges three figures an hour who can successfully fight lawyers who make four?
You really don't know what you are talking about.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by Califemme
Johnny, please try to see what I'm saying here. Who's best interest did you have at heart when YOU were negotiating? Did you have mine? Did you say "no, we [union fellas] don't need 1.5 hour lunches" or did you try and get 1.5 hour lunches for your union members? (I'm not saying this is what you did, I'm just trying to get you to understand the point of my post)
Imagine I'm the negotiator for the taxpayers... Who will try as hard as me to keep costs down? You? High level managers? Staff attorneys? High level managers and staff attorneys will continue "negotiating" for how long? Until the government runs out of money? We're there now. The only people capable of representing taxpayers in union demands are... wait for it... TAXPAYERS!!
Do you get me now bad speller?!?
Honestly? We were all proud of the institution that we served. Those who negotiated against us were top level management and high-end lawyers...tough and nasty. We fought for job security and a fair increase in wages. They purposely negotiated us into a completely untenable position, and walked out. They didn't come back to the table til it was apparent we'd go out on legal strike. We called their bluff. But you know the one point that they absolutely refused to negotiate? A ban on bullying in the workplace!
You all forget that a good employer does not get a union. And that a collective agreement is just that...a mutually agreed upon set of rules for the workplace. And a deal ought to be a deal...especially when it wasn't the unions that killed the economy. Go after your lawmakers, not your neighbours. Anything else is a race to the bottom and you all lose.
Just to point out...we have a higher rate of unionised workers in Canada...and we don't have the housing foreclosures. The dots are there if you care to connect them
Originally posted by HoldTheBeans
Ten percent work in unions. How are we able to not live in squalor us non union folks? Sounds like your wife chose the profession she's at and likes or she could go make 100K like you say. I don't see what your howling about. Fact is in the open marketplace you can be compensated for your individual talent and not have to drag the underachievers along with you. That is why unions are socialist. Spread the wealth. No thank you I'll achieve my own wealth and not force taxpayers to provide wealth for me.
Originally posted by Califemme
Can you hear me now?!?
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by Califemme
Trust me, finding a pro bono lawyer isn't anywhere as easy as all that. I and a group of my colleagues tried for years to find one to help us clean up our union. Although all the ones we contacted told us we had a good class action case, none would tkae it without a substantial retainer. eventually we prevailed but only after years of sacrifice and hard work.
I am very well aware of the flaws in unions, having fought them hard for several years, but to allow employers the power to dictate terms with no recourse will only lead us to feudal times.
What would you do if a legislature decided that legal fees were strangling business and passed a law that limited lawyers' fees to $25.00 an hour to help balance the state budget?
Would you support that?
It seems like a reasonable way to balance the budget to me.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by Califemme
Can you hear me now?!?
Oh, I hear you, but I believe the only thing we share is that neither of us know what you are talking about.
Originally posted by Califemme
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by Califemme
Can you hear me now?!?
Oh, I hear you, but I believe the only thing we share is that neither of us know what you are talking about.
Awesome, glad your hearing AND reading skills are in order.
So............................... did you unionize for a company who makes a profit or not? Because that sort of ties in my posts' points. I'm sorry if I've made this discussion so hard for you to follow along with me.
>>the department [of administration] may sell any state−owned heating, cooling, and power plant or may contract with a private entity for the operation of any such plant, with or without solicitation of bids, for any amount...
Originally posted by villagesmithie
How about this section of the "budget repair bill".
>>the department [of administration] may sell any state−owned heating, cooling, and power plant or may contract with a private entity for the operation of any such plant, with or without solicitation of bids, for any amount...
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
Yep, I trust those AFL-CIO surveys.
Not tainted at all.
Poll: Americans favor union bargaining rights
Americans strongly oppose laws taking away the collective bargaining power of public employee unions, according to a new USA TODAY/Gallup Poll. The poll found 61% would oppose a law in their state similar to such a proposal in Wisconsin, compared with 33% who would favor such a law. www.usatoday.com...
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
Oh, you mean the liberal USAToday put out a poll that favors unions?
Go figure.
.
There we go, now we are getting to the real reason why there is so much excitement going on in Wisconsin!!
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
Oh, you mean the liberal USAToday put out a poll that favors unions?
Go figure.
Holdin' out for FOX are you?
UPDATED: Fox Reverses Poll Results To Falsely Claim Most Americans Favor Ending Collective Bargaining
On Fox & Friends, co-host Brian Kilmeade claimed, along with an on-screen graphic, that a recent USA Today/Gallup poll found that "61 percent" of Americans are in favor of taking away collective bargaining rights from public unions. In fact, Fox aired the results of the poll completely backward: the Gallup poll found that 61 percent of Americans are opposed to taking away collective bargaining rights. mediamatters.org...