It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

i used to fly chemtrail planes

page: 2
4
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:01 PM
link   
Welcome to ATS,
Some proof of your claims would be welcome too.

also some questions:
What kind of chemicals were spraid?
You mentioned the dead birds too, what kind of chemical was used?




posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:01 PM
link   
reply to post by micstreicher
 


Well that's got to be some kind of record for a poster getting banned, lol!



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:02 PM
link   
Queue the crickets...



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:04 PM
link   
Does the fact that this thread was marked a hoax in record time once again illustrate that there is in fact a conspiracy at ATS against the chemtrail conspiracy?

I've seen much stupider claims go on for much longer. Who could possibly have had the time to determine whether this is or is not a hoax in this short amount of time?

Wow, the poster was banned to? For just saying what he or she did? This is quite strange and quite troublesome.

Someone clearly either knows more than we do or there is something very mysterious afoot here.
edit on 2/16/2011 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:05 PM
link   
What fl did you used to fly at?

You mention the chemical is mixed with fuel, is this before or after the aircraft is refueled?

How did you calculate wind drift for dispersal?



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:09 PM
link   
WHY OH WHY do I always miss all the fun????

Oh well. Bye Bernie.



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:09 PM
link   
reply to post by ~Lucidity
 


No facts - no credibility. Are we to just believe anything at face value? Is that what you do?



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:09 PM
link   
Theres no point in asking this fellow any technical questions. You certainly wont get any information that is even remotely true.

I hate to see the troll humored.

edit: Oh joy, the banhammer works its justice
edit on 16-2-2011 by SPACEYstranger because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
What fl did you used to fly at?

You mention the chemical is mixed with fuel, is this before or after the aircraft is refueled?

How did you calculate wind drift for dispersal?



pfffffft the member is banned !! He can't answer you.

edit on 16-2-2011 by rigel4 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by ~Lucidity
Does the fact that this thread was marked a hoax in record time once again illustrate that there is in fact a conspiracy at ATS against the chemtrail conspiracy?

I've seen much stupider claims go on for much longer. Who could possibly have had the time to determine whether this is or is not a hoax in this short amount of time?

Wow, the poster was banned to? For just saying what he or she did? This is quite strange and quite troublesome.

Someone clearly either knows more than we do or there is something very mysterious afoot here.
edit on 2/16/2011 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)


The thread was sooooooooo obviously a hoax even to a simple soul like me.The mods were right to label it and ban the member for time wasting.



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:12 PM
link   
reply to post by rigel4
 


not to defend the OP but i'm pretty sure RAF Leeming is in North Yorkshire, having said that the OP clearly seems to be lacking the technical jargon of a pilot.



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by WhateverHappens
reply to post by ~Lucidity
 


No facts - no credibility. Are we to just believe anything at face value? Is that what you do?


No need to make asinine assumptions about me or get snarky and attack. Nothing in my post could possibly have led an intelligent person to make the kind of comment that you just made to me.

My point stands. This poster was not given any amount of reasonable time to either prove or disprove his or her claims.

Please try actually reading and digesting first before you regurgitate.

reply to post by rigel4
 

It was quite obviously nothing yet. It was not given time to develop.
edit on 2/16/2011 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:16 PM
link   
reply to post by ~Lucidity
 


Perhaps ATS has access to Bernard's IP address and knows when he pops in with a new ID? I have no clue... I don't know if they have access to that type of info or not. Maybe the fact that he claimed there were bases in an area where there are none was a give away? I'm just guessing here. That was pretty damn fast!



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   
reply to post by gemineye
 


It was fast. Perhaps it is something like that, as I had stated. Someone either knows something we don't or ...



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   
reply to post by gemineye
 


It was fast. Perhaps it is something like that, as I had stated. Someone either knows something we don't or ...



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   
reply to post by ~Lucidity
 


No assumptions, just questions. If they upset you, maybe you should think about that. Just a thought. Be well.



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   
Welcome: interesting claims; please give us some harmless unclassified details on your aircraft so we can independently corroborate your "bona fides"
i.e. type of aircraft; anything particular to that model of aircraft we can check on; It would add credibility to anything else you would like to pass on: I have family working Air guard "transient ramp" who have much ground experience with various military and civilian heavy aircraft and current single place fighters.Other family still active; with years of ground/maintenance experience in MAC and aref sq kc-135/kc-10 programs.
Sorry; if you had any idea the number of folks who make extraordinary claims here You'd understand...



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:20 PM
link   
A bit of time to ascertain the facts and debate is good way to deny ignorance. What has happened here is concerning to be thrown in the hoax box so quickly. The poster has been swamped with questions and barely had time to respond. It may be a hoax, but I have not seen enough reasoned discussion to arrive at that decision. I do like ATS because many ideas and issues can be openly discussed. I am left ignorant in this thread.



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:22 PM
link   
reply to post by ~Lucidity
 


In this case I would assume that the op had been contacted by a mod via U2U. Not supplying facts or proof, he was shown the door.

But I may be wrong. Yet it would explain his being banned so fast.



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 05:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by WhateverHappens
reply to post by ~Lucidity
 

Upset?

No assumptions, just questions. If they upset you, maybe you should think about that. Just a thought. Be well.


Upset?
Why would I be upset? I'm not the one who displayed rush to judgment and ignorance here.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join