It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Earthquake Swarm in Arkansas Intensifies. Memphis, Tennessee could be epicenter for the next big one

page: 52
287
<< 49  50  51    53  54  55 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   
Magnitude
3.5
Date-Time
Saturday, February 19, 2011 at 23:04:58 UTC
Saturday, February 19, 2011 at 05:04:58 PM at epicenter
Location
35.216°N, 92.364°W
Depth
4.9 km (3.0 miles) set by location program
Region
ARKANSAS
Distances
3 km (2 miles) SE (124°) from Greenbrier, AR
8 km (5 miles) ENE (78°) from Wooster, AR
10 km (6 miles) NW (310°) from Holland, AR
16 km (10 miles) NNE (30°) from Conway, AR
53 km (33 miles) N (357°) from Little Rock, AR
424 km (263 miles) SSW (207°) from St. Louis, MO
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 13 km (8.1 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters
NST= 27, Nph= 31, Dmin=11.1 km, Rmss=0.47 sec, Gp= 54°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=5
Source
U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center:
World Data Center for Seismology, Denver
Event ID
usb0001hac




posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:18 PM
link   
Anyone notice anything about these quakes??

MAP 2.2 2011/02/19 23:01:11 34.312 -118.705 3.5 6 km ( 3 mi) NE of Simi Valley, CA
MAP 2.1 2011/02/19 22:58:06 19.473 -155.263 5.1 4 km ( 2 mi) NW of Volcano, HI
MAP 3.2 2011/02/19 22:57:13 34.310 -118.705 5.3 5 km ( 3 mi) NE of Simi Valley, CA

Look at the times.

That volcano is pretty clearly on the same fault as the other two... They are playing off each other

Star, I will look for some good solunar calenders. Remember if you search for "Solunar" it has much more useable results than "lunar" or "solar" calender.

And puterman, you must have misinterpretated my sarcasm.



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:21 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


Thanks! I was watching it on GEE and wondered how big it was. I`m new to all of this, and need the help I`m getting in abundance here. It really means alot. Thanks again



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by BobAthome
This is just a theory Ark. should get a 3.5-4.0 next little while ie hours,, we shall see. just wanted to doc.

I repeat just a theory not in any way a forewarning.


Well my timming sucks. orig post : 19-2-2011 @ 12:11 PM by BobAthome
edit on 19-2-2011 by BobAthome because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:22 PM
link   
reply to post by 9Cib27
 


How are two quakes in southern california connected to the quake in hawaii?



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:25 PM
link   
reply to post by 9Cib27
 


OK. Try
or something next time!



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:26 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


It is just theory depending on the tiny amount of time between quakes.

Also that 3.0+ in Arkansas I felt electronically.



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:27 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


Doesn't look 3.5 to me. I am thinking closer to 3. Time will tell.

Edit:

They are playing with it. It went to 3.1, and now it has just jumped back to 3.4.
edit on 19/2/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:28 PM
link   
I need to get my tin foil hat on...

anyone in the thread have any extra tin foil?

i swear i am getting feelings in my brain before the ark quakes.

just a coincidence i'm sure



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:30 PM
link   
I lost my link to a good siesmo can someone please put up a link to a good one near guy. thank you



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Fritzthecat
 


Look at my signature

You can't get any closer than that.

edit on 19/2/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:33 PM
link   
OK what's up with TA X40A GEE ?

And a list of Helicorders in AR...

folkworm.ceri.memphis.edu...


edit on 2/19/2011 by Hx3_1963 because: updates



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Hx3_1963
 


Looks like interference on the E and N channels.

Z seems to be OK.
edit on 19/2/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by SunflowerStar
reply to post by 9Cib27
 


9Cib27, I am interested in the lunar effects on earthquakes as well. I only have a small section in my links list. Anything you could post I will most definitely include in the masterlist.


I've posted a couple of links in this thread that relate to this topic. From the little bit I've read it seems as though there are some schools of thought on both sides as to the lunar influence on seismic activity.



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Hx3_1963
 


I`m wondering that as well. I`ve seen it before in the last 48 hours, and grabbed screenshots just to compare later.



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:38 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Thank you. I`m thankful for all the great info you`ve given us!



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:42 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


What I was looking at was the sustained higher readings after the other channels had subsided...

And it was the Z Channel BTW...

There were also some smaller spikes...Hmmm...I'll keep my eyes open for anomalies...


edit on 2/19/2011 by Hx3_1963 because: updates



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:43 PM
link   
Do you think the interference on that heliocorder is abnormal or just a coincidence ?

and look at this link:
en.wikipedia.org...:Wikinaut/Moon-Earthquake-Theory



it shows that the indian ocean earthquake was on a PERIGEE MOON

WHICH IS TONIGHT

en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:44 PM
link   
Hi All,

On the theory I posted earlier, All I have found on the subject of nuclear used in extracting natural gas goes like this:

Ten years of talking from the scientific community, Three mostly positive tests(late 60s)(high radiation was a lie and has been proven by the former Soviet Union on multiple occasions), but it was not cost effective($25m spent max 40% return). Two years grumbling about it. 11 years of nothing. Lots of conversation again through the 80s and dwindled to whispers among the outer scientific community. Talks picked up in 2009-10 leading to Colorado passing a law making this technique illegal in Colorado without public vote. There seams to be the possibility of removing the ban to extract around the original test sites(currently 1/2 mile)Which leads me to believe that the gas accumulates over time. However I can not find any newer tests done after the originals in the late 60s(U.S.) except with very small detonations(Worldwide) nor any use commercially.

So unless I stumble upon new info I will call this myth busted.



posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 05:47 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Gee thanks sir. Your sorta a handy guy to have around lol.



new topics

top topics



 
287
<< 49  50  51    53  54  55 >>

log in

join