It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NWOnoworldorder
reply to post by Xcalibur254
nibiru is still the same that brown dwarf planet that is very difficult to locate seeing as its a dark planet.
Brown dwarfs are sub-stellar objects which are too low in mass to sustain stable hydrogen fusion. Their mass is below that necessary to maintain hydrogen-fueled nuclear fusion reactions in their cores, which is characteristic of stars on the main sequence. Brown dwarfs have fully convective surfaces and interiors, with no chemical differentiation by depth. Brown dwarfs occupy the mass range between that of large gas giant planets and the lowest-mass stars; this upper limit is between 75 and 80 Jupiter masses (MJ). Currently there is some debate as to what criterion to use to define the separation between a brown dwarf and a giant planet at very low brown dwarf masses (~13 MJ ), and whether brown dwarfs are required to have experienced fusion at some point in their history. In any event, brown dwarfs heavier than 13 MJ do fuse deuterium and those above ~65 MJ also fuse lithium. Some planets are known to orbit brown dwarfs: 2M1207b, MOA-2007-BLG-192Lb, and 2MASS J044144
Whether it would become the new ninth planet would be decided by the International Astronomical Union (IAU). The main argument against is that Tyche probably formed around another star and was later captured by the Sun's gravitational field. The IAU may choose to create a whole new category for Tyche, Professor Matese said.
The IAU would also have the final say about the gas giant's name. To the Greeks, Tyche was the goddess responsible for the destiny of cities. Her name was provisionally chosen in reference to an earlier hypothesis, now largely abandoned, that the Sun might be part of a binary star system with a dim companion
Based on mathematical evidence, astronomers have been so sure of the reality of this planet that they named it Planet X. The name stands for the tenth planet, as well as the mathematical symbol for an unknown quantity.
This story reported that the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) detected heat from an object about fifty billion miles away.
So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through.
mum was the word on the issue of Planet X during the 1990s
i didn't say every point was factual. did you care to read about the points stating astrologers throughout history have mathematically calculated the existence of a 'large' body beyond Pluto?
First of all no astrologers calculate anything. Pluto was not known throughout history. It was discovered rather recently.
or did you read about NASA's press release in 1983/84 and again in 1992 concerning the discovery of a massive body in the outer reaches of our solar system.
Are you talking about the 1983 press release where NASA did NOT announce the discovery of a new planet? I'm sure you are. Is this what you are referring to?
Possibly as Large as Jupiter; Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered
NASA does not announce a new planet at this press conference.
Please provide a link to the 1992 claim. I'd like to read it.
perhaps you read about the Sumerian tablets documenting the 'planet'? maybe you skipped over ancient Egyptian, Mayan, or Greek documentation of the existence of a 10th planet?
The ancient Sumerians did not know about any planets other than Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. Where do you get the mistaken notion that they knew about more planets than those visible to the naked eye?
did you read about the magnetism of the Earth being disrupted as seen in the Earths sedimentation dating back in rotation ever 3,400-3,600 years? no i don't think your lazy *** did.
First of all it doesn't happen every 3,400-3,600 years. Please get off your lazy star-star-star and do a little research. Earth's magnetism is due to convection current in the outer core. The changes in the field are due to changes inside of the Earth.
was actually viewed on a NASA satellite so it is in fact real.
This is a lie and disinformation being spread from NASA which is another reason why I believe the 'discovery' of Eris was to confuse/distract people from the massive body found in 1983.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by jessejamesxx
Can you tell us what the drawing represents. What is the yellow dot? What is the blue dot? What do the ellipses represent? I'd rather not guess.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by loagun
Do you know that Eris was found as part of the Kuiper belt survey. Do you know how small Eris is compared to our Moon? Do you know that the idea of a dwarf planet was based on finding that there were more objects like Pluto. Eris was not downgraded. Eris led to a reclassification because it was discovered.
The most fascinating explanation of this mystery body, which is so cold it casts no light and has never been seen by optical telescopes on Earth or in space, is that it is a giant gaseous planet, as large as Jupiter and as close to Earth as 50 billion miles. this is taken right from the Washington Post article of 1983.... thank you....
You're almost right. It is real, but not a planet. It was a number of distant objects, an interstellar cirrus cloud and a number of new galaxies with no optical counterpart.
Confusion 3 - The reassignment of Eris from planet was due to its discovery. There was no dwarf planet class before Eris was discovered.
Confusion 4 - An object 50 trillion miles away would be part of our solar system. That's 8 light years away.