I was browsing through this article concerning the collapse of the twin towers on 9/11
I clicked on 'earlier article about the
detailing the strange disintegration of the spire and some things seemed strange to me regarding these two photographs.
First off, it is obvious, by the degree of dust dispersal, that the photographs have been taken in very close succession (1 or 2 seconds apart maybe)
and by the same photographer. Furthermore, the second shot seems to have been taken from the same spot as the first, just zoomed out a little.
Observe, in the 1st photo, the yellow 'trashcan' to the left of the lamp-post, on front of the man with the white shirt.
Draw an imaginary line from the photographer, through the man in the white shirt, throught the yellow trashcan towards the building almost engulfed in
smoke. Let this be the principle line of sight for the shot.
Observe the distance between the yellow trashcan and the lamp-post on its right.
Observe the car between the photographer and the man in the white shirt.
Observe the black man with the white shirt adjacent to the car.
Observe the colour of the smoke about to encompass the building is a very dark grey..
Now lets move on to the second, slightly later photograph.
Our principle line of sight is again taken as an imaginary line from the photographer, through the yellow trashcan and onto the building now almost
completely engulfed in smoke, pretty close (but not quite) to our principle line of sight for the 1st picture.
Observe now that the yellow trashcan is directly behind the lamp-post.
Observe that the blackman in the white shirt, adjacent to the car in the 1st picture, has vanished from the shot.
Observe that the car seen in the 1st photo has vanished also, and been mysteriously replaced by a police SUV.
Observe that the man in the white shirt, seen on front of the yellow trashcan in the 1st picture, has suddenly, improbably, jumped position but seems
to be in the exact same stance.
Observe the colour of the smoke has changed from being a dark grey to a light grey in a very short space of time.
As it is clear that these shots cannot, judging by the dust dispersal difference between the two pictures, have been taken more than a few seconds
apart, we have to conclude that there is something very suspicious going on. The photograph perspectives seem to be at odds with one another.
I contend that these photographs have been faked. At a higher zoom level, all the figures and buildings in the pictures are pixilated around the
edges, indicating that these graphics have been photo-shopped. The man in the white shirt is identical in stance in both photographs and has been cut
and pasted in. More-over, if you zoom in to about 500%, to this man in the white shirt in the 1st photo, you will clearly see that a large chunk of
the left side of the back of his head is missing. You will also notice that his right hand is in an impossible position, by the back of his head, with
his mutant thumb distorted above his fingers.
I conclude that it is therfore meaningless to investigate, via the photographic evidence available, the exact causes and mechanisms of collapse of the
twin towers as it is reasonable to suggest that if one photograph has been faked, then so very well may the rest of them. The confusion in analysing
the collapse of the twin towers over the past 10 years then simply amounts to confusion arising from the analysis of faked imagery, which does not of
course have to act according to any accepted laws of physics, just within the programming parameters of the designed demolition software.
Similar anomalies and impossibilities can be discovered on most photographic and video evidence relating to that day in september 2001.