Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Readies National Guard Against Unions , page 6


Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 28 times


reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 03:18 PM by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by MMPI2



Enjoy your $4.25 an hour then. And don't bitch if you get fired for asking for vacation time, or have to take care of your sick child, or because your boss is having a bad day.

Don't bitch about any of that; that's what those of us in unions are for - to put our necks out for stupid pissants who act against their own self-interest because the bosses scare them into it.
edit on 15/2/2011 by TheWalkingFox because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 04:56 PM by kroms33
reply to post by Califemme



Haven't you been reading anything anyone is posting here? Stop quoting the same old rehtoric of the banker elitists, it is nothing but drivil.

How hard do you work for a living? Do you sit in an office behind a big desk an tell people what to do? What is your worth? Who are you to judge anyone? Oh, thats right - you are just like the rest of us... a nobody.


Unions are good for one thing: Getting the most amount of pay for the least amount of work.


Yeah, go up to some union construction worker who has been using his muscles all day long so he can put food on his plate for his family and tell him that. I bet 'said' worker would show you exactly how lazy his muscles really are. What propaganda and crap.


reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 05:09 PM by ~Lucidity
reply to post by kroms33


Or go up to any communications (IT) workers who frantically scrambled to join and form unions after the fact, when offshoring started happening and they realized they had absolutely no control over their fates standing alone...an individual at a time. Employers of course will hate unions. That's a natural state of affairs. But that fact in no way negates a union's purpose, effectiveness, or value to the average worker. The unions aren't out to "get them," but just to make sure there is fair and equitable representation against what, in many cases, are giant corporations with the most clever accountants, best legal contortionists, and supportive governments behind them that money can buy.


reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 06:30 PM by kroms33
reply to post by ~Lucidity



100% agreed!

You got it. I wish I was in an IT union before the dot com's fell (although I know it wouldn't have given me job security - I just remember all of the office and corporate evils that was happening). Although I do like what I am doing now, it pays the bills and keeps me fit - I still have my love for computers and technology.

I keep telling people on this thread that what is happening in Wis. has nothing to do with Unions - these problems stem from government and banks. Not one of these anti-union people have anything to say about that... hmmm. Perhaps they didn't know? That would be a shock unto itself since they keep calling union members 'stupid' and 'lazy'.

I wonder who is "stupid" for not being educated about the facts?
I wonder who is "lazy" for not doing their homework?

Only the people who throw the stones at their own glass houses.

I don't mean to come off as crass as them - forgive me. It just hits home when people scream and yell about unions and how much we get paid when they never look at their own worth. Who is anyone to judge me or anyone else out there that is trying to support himself and his family? These same people who moan and cry about unions - where are they when these corporate executives take millions a year in bonuses? Where are they when these execs kill the 401k's and pensions of common people? Nowhere.

peace.


reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 07:04 PM by ~Lucidity
reply to post by kroms33


The people who bought the lines about unions being bad are the same ones who bought the BS about certain factions of the government being good for them....the Joe the Plumbers, if you will, thinking that any of what they're buying into will ever mean a thing to them. Sometimes I swear people first sacrifice and overlook a lot about the big picture of what they're supporting overall and then maybe they just get sucked into actually supporting it all without really thinking about what it means. Hell I don't know anymore.


reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 07:12 PM by brill
Originally posted by nivekronnoco
reply to
post by brill



By turning down the stimulus money....2300 jobs were eliminated....
He's a facist...trying to destroy the middle class....


You mean the same stimulus that is close to being further announced as QE III ? The stimulus doesn't appear to be working, unemployment shows little change and the debt is bulging at the equator. Sure there may have been 2300 jobs, and thats a positive, but its difficult to say where that could have gone. All politicians are losers I do however find it rare to see one actually return money as he did. He is facing the same problems almost everyone other state is going or is currently facing. Tough choices and decisions are needed and they are indeed going to be extremely painful.

brill


reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 07:17 PM by Flatfish
Originally posted by exile1981
reply to
post by Flatfish



No that business was breaking the law by forcing employees to work unpaid over time. In the case of what I was saying is that employees should expect to work 8 hours and get paid for the time they work, if the welders worked 8.5 hours they got paid full wage for 8 hours and 1.5 times for the next half hour so it was like getting paid for 8.75 hours.

During my year of hell the Union took to following home the non union guys and harrassing them at home and demanding they sign forms authorizing the union to represent them to management. We where a small shop with 5 welders and 4 other staff, it's not like we were a big fish but they didn't like the idea of a non-union shop and though as a little guy they could pressure us easier.



O.K., now we're getting some where. The problem you experienced was caused by both, yourself and the union. I call it; Lack of creative negotiations.

There will always be some workers who are slower than others, so eight hours of work for one may not equal eight hours of work for the other. (speaking solely in terms of production) When my union was faced with this production vs. time debate, we proposed a piece-meal contract where workers were paid based on production and not on an hourly basis. Under the new agreement, highly productive gangs would often earn 12 hrs. pay in 8 hrs. time. Now I'm sure your going to say that the union was screwing the employer under this agreement but let me explain how he benefited from it before you do.

Our pay was based on a production rate of 55 metric tons per hour being loaded onboard the ship. When a highly productive gang loaded 660 tons of cargo in 8 hrs. they got paid for 12 hrs. but the employer did not have to pay any overtime. Only the 8 hrs. actually worked counted towards the 40 hr. straight time week. The employer got better production and the workers got to go home to their families at a decent hour. On top of that, this process made it much easier for the employer to bid his jobs on a turn-key basis as he knew his cost per ton up front.

More often than not, when good minds meet at the table during collective bargaining negotiations and do so in "Good Faith," they can overcome almost any obstacle facing business.


reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 07:20 PM by Flatfish
reply to post by ~Lucidity



I think it's a lot like the AT&T guy on the Tmobile commercial. When ask why his customer had to pay more for less, he replied; "It Makes Sense If You Don't Think About It."


reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 07:25 PM by itsawild1
Originally posted by CholmondleyWarner
Originally posted by rebeldog
reply to
post by CholmondleyWarner



a nationwide strike is the only thing that will work. everyone just stay home. the elites can't fathom fending for themselves. they pay evreyone to do their work. to feed them, clean for them, cure them, etc..


now you 2 guys are one of the smart ones--its amazing isnt it how afraid the masses are to DO just what you 2 guys have stated here. At least i know a couple of other like minded people are out their.

I laugh at scott walker , and they replaced feingold with this ass--and i laugh because the people affected with this union breaking manuver are the same ones who voted for him. HA HA HAAA !-




Too true my friend. If people go out onto the streets and riot the government may enforce martial law and people will undoubtedly be killed. The riots themselves wil almost certainly be provoked by agent provacateurs, secreted within the crowd to cause trouble. If we simply all just stayed in our homes and refused to play their corrupt game there is little they can do about it...



reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 07:33 PM by itsawild1
Originally posted by CholmondleyWarner
Originally posted by rebeldog
reply to
post by CholmondleyWarner



a nationwide strike is the only thing that will work. everyone just stay home. the elites can't fathom fending for themselves. they pay evreyone to do their work. to feed them, clean for them, cure them, etc..

You two guys are like minded like me-- --f-it, soon with all the job losses in wisconsin we will be home anyhow.
I am a carpenter and the un-employment rate with us is almost 35%-friend in sheet metal union said his un-employment for his trade as stated by their union is approching 60%-wow!
SCOTT WALKER, if you listened to him in the debates with feingold, came across as a child, ign
orant and still he got voted in because these tea party and republicans wanted fiscal change. NOW THE DUMMIES WILL GET IT, ha ha ha ha !!!





Too true my friend. If people go out onto the streets and riot the government may enforce martial law and people will undoubtedly be killed. The riots themselves wil almost certainly be provoked by agent provacateurs, secreted within the crowd to cause trouble. If we simply all just stayed in our homes and refused to play their corrupt game there is little they can do about it...



reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 07:44 PM by NoHierarchy
This move by the Wisconsin governor

REEKS OF FASCISM




One of the first moves of the Nazi party was to destroy and assimilate unions and other 'socialist' groups. Please read:
fcit.usf.edu...

The first Nazi attack was upon the two larger unions. On April 21, 1933 an order not even in the name of the Government, but of the Nazi Party was issued by the conspirator Robert Ley as "Chief of Staff of the political organization of the NSDAP," applicable to the Trade Union Confederation and the Independent Employees Confederation. It directed seizure of their properties and arrest of their principal leaders. The party order directed party organs which we here denounce as criminal associations, the SA and SS "to be employed for the occupation of the trade union properties, and for the taking into custody of personalities who come into question." And it directed the taking into "protective custody" of all chairmen and district secretaries of such unions and b ranch directors of the labor bank (392-PS).



This is a time to remember this quote:


When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.


-Martin Niemöller




Think it can't happen here? THINK AGAIN.
edit on 15-2-2011 by NoHierarchy because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 09:45 PM by kroms33
reply to post by Black_Fox




There's much more to this than pention plans..................
Apparently Mr.Walker has ALOT of "changes" in store.


My God! This is the beginning isn't it? This is really truly "it".

Down with the system, up with humanity.
edit on 2/15/2011 by kroms33 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 10:14 PM by desert
reply to post by kroms33



This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper

ts eliot


reply posted on 15-2-2011 @ 10:32 PM by kroms33
reply to post by desert



We will not die - this is not the end of the world... we will not die insignificant deaths, we are significant.

For those who don't understand: the interpretation of TS Elliot's poem The Hollow Men (the end of it)
is as follows:
People don't die in a truly exceptional way, no matter what we'd like to believe. Usually, they die an insignificant death - like a "whimper".

Humanity will not go silently.

What needs to happen is pressure to stop the bill from the rest of the country. The people have let their leaders corruption and abuse continue for too long.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^