It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Originally posted by SirMike
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Oh no ... we are zeros in Proto's eyes! Anything but that!
Spend a couple of months in Afghanistan, or 20 like I did, and then tell me we are on the wrong side of history here.
The history that displays Afghanistan is the grave yard of empires?
Oh boy, someone hasn't been paying attention to what goes on, on planet earth again.
Not only are you on the wrong side of history, but a thankless and stupid side of it too.
Evolution is something that occurs at it's own pace, your posts are proof positive of that!
Greeks, Persians, Mongols
Originally posted by SirMike
reply to post by bigyin
I don’t think that’s a good comparison. My understanding of drone ROE’s are as follows: how important is the target, how sure are you that this is the target, how many opportunities like this are you likely to have again, how many non combatants might be injured or killed.
After weighing all this, the lawyers gather round and make a decision on whether or not a strong legal justification can be made to engage the suspect.
To say these decisions are made lightly or with little forethought to the consequences is based on willful ignorance or malicious deception because its not like this information is hidden.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
In answer to your question OP: No, these are not acts of Terrorism
They are brutal acts of murder and stupidity.
One of the real problems that confronts us are the word games involved since World War II.
Terrorists, Enemy Combatants, Detainees, Insugregents etc, are all just ways to try to draw out and lead to a personal view of the act through the word(s).
Freedom fighters, liberators, preemptive war, coalition, more words meant to draw a conclusion.
It would seem we have become either to dumb, or to fightened to call a rose by it's name any more, in a never ending attempt by Government and media to get the populace to draw certain conclusions.
No this is not terrorism, the goal is not a political one. It's a business goal. Murder, Inc. is simply doing what it does best, murder and kill people in our name, with our money to steal and secure opium, oil and minerals, and force people into a world dominated by corporate outlets, distribution systems and control.
Because we no longer call a spade a spade, people can reject it when ever it's directed at them.
It's a little harder to claim that the U.S. Drones are not murdering people left and right all over the world.
It's a little harder to say it's not stupid and bankrupting America and making us far more enemies than friends.
So no it's not terrorism, it's just murder and stupidity, with murder almost always stupid, if your backs not up against the wall in a corner and you have no other choice.
Ours certainly isn't, but our government's policies are designed to eventually put us all back up against the wall in a corner.
Originally posted by SirMike
reply to post by bigyin
I don’t think that’s a good comparison. My understanding of drone ROE’s are as follows: how important is the target, how sure are you that this is the target, how many opportunities like this are you likely to have again, how many non combatants might be injured or killed.
After weighing all this, the lawyers gather round and make a decision on whether or not a strong legal justification can be made to engage the suspect.
To say these decisions are made lightly or with little forethought to the consequences is based on willful ignorance or malicious deception because its not like this information is hidden.
One powerful comment there PT.....I can fully agree with this and am just amazed that the majority of the folks don't see the whole picture. Maybe they do but stay mute? . Anyways your statement above is a real keeper at least in my head.
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by SirMike
reply to post by bigyin
I don’t think that’s a good comparison. My understanding of drone ROE’s are as follows: how important is the target, how sure are you that this is the target, how many opportunities like this are you likely to have again, how many non combatants might be injured or killed.
After weighing all this, the lawyers gather round and make a decision on whether or not a strong legal justification can be made to engage the suspect.
To say these decisions are made lightly or with little forethought to the consequences is based on willful ignorance or malicious deception because its not like this information is hidden.
So if the Canadians knew there were some terrorists just south of their border
you'd be OK with them sending in a drone strike?
And if they accidently took out a few US citizens you'd be OK with that?
Seems to me that so many on ATS consider anyone outside of the West something less than human..
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by SirMike
reply to post by bigyin
I don’t think that’s a good comparison. My understanding of drone ROE’s are as follows: how important is the target, how sure are you that this is the target, how many opportunities like this are you likely to have again, how many non combatants might be injured or killed.
After weighing all this, the lawyers gather round and make a decision on whether or not a strong legal justification can be made to engage the suspect.
To say these decisions are made lightly or with little forethought to the consequences is based on willful ignorance or malicious deception because its not like this information is hidden.
So if the Canadians knew there were some terrorists just south of their border
you'd be OK with them sending in a drone strike?
And if they accidently took out a few US citizens you'd be OK with that?
Seems to me that so many on ATS consider anyone outside of the West something less than human..
Originally posted by dl2one
reply to post by backinblack
Seems to be the norm around here lately. And what's more, where the heck are these stars coming from on some of these posts.. oh ya, this site is getting extremely diluted
Originally posted by Iwinder
Originally posted by dl2one
reply to post by backinblack
Seems to be the norm around here lately. And what's more, where the heck are these stars coming from on some of these posts.. oh ya, this site is getting extremely diluted
I don't follow your statement above? Sometimes you have got to knock me on the head a few times to get the info in so if your still here please pound away. :-)
I have no idea of what your post has to do with the OP.
No offense intended here.
Regards, Iwinder
Originally posted by dl2one
Originally posted by Iwinder
Originally posted by dl2one
reply to post by backinblack
Seems to be the norm around here lately. And what's more, where the heck are these stars coming from on some of these posts.. oh ya, this site is getting extremely diluted
I don't follow your statement above? Sometimes you have got to knock me on the head a few times to get the info in so if your still here please pound away. :-)
I have no idea of what your post has to do with the OP.
No offense intended here.
Regards, Iwinder
I directed my statement at nobody. I'm merely pointing out an obvious fact that this site is getting diluted with so many ignorant and personal attack comments, reinforced by stars for some.edit on 15-2-2011 by dl2one because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DimensionalDetective
I must imagine, should the proverbial shoe lie on the other foot, we would likely draw the same conclusion here...
It is under all circumstances an advantage to be in full possession of one's personality, otherwise the repressed elements will only crop up as a hindrance elsewhere, not just at some unimportant point, but at the very spot where we are most sensitive. If people can be educated to see the shadow-side of their nature clearly, it may be hoped that they will also learn to understand and love their fellow men better. A little less hypocrisy and a little more self-knowledge can only have good results in respect for our neighbor; for we are all too prone to transfer to our fellows the injustice and violence we inflict upon our own natures (Jung, 1966:par. 28)