If the information to be released regarding the bank of america causes a bank run then so be it.
So be it huh …. Well I’ll be sure to hit your pantry first when I get hungry. Oh, I’m sorry, you don’t like that? I’m not playing by the
“rules”? Well, according to people like Anonymous, if I can justify something I do it, regardless of its legality, and I sure do gotta eat.
would you rather the inner workings of a bank never scrutinised and they the theft of trillions of dollars around the world be let happen
again. The information will show criminal activilty and probley cause further bank regulations and rightly so. These banks have had a lot of tax
payers money and have a social responsibilty if they like it or not a little transparency is not too much to ask.
There are proper channels for that. The FDIC, Office of Thrift Supervision, Federal Reserve, National Credit Union Administration etcetera, just on
the federal level. There are also State and local regulatory agencies that provide oversight. Are they perfect, obviously not, but just because a
small group of people are dissatisfied with the way they operate, or more likely Anonymous doesn’t know how or even the fact that they do operate,
doesn’t give anyone the right to take the law into their own hands.
Vigilantism is something I don’t tolerate.
If the truth kills you evidently you were not that strong.
Have you ever heard the phrase “the markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent”? It means that when emotions, like greed and
fear, are the prime drivers behind financial events, it doesn’t matter how financially healthy you are.
realy i dont understand were you are coming from are you saying that you should be labeled an anarchist for telling the truth?
Once again, it aint your place. IF the mechanisms in place are not working, then change them. Don’t take the law into your own hands because that
simply provides everybody with the same excuse you are using.
Not being able to stop an idea whos time has come...try looking at egypt, or tunisa for example. look at wikileaks and how they are ushering in
a new dawn of journalism, see the massive paradigm shifts that are occuring right now. Korea and Tianum square it was not there time yet, but one day
it will be.
Its not about whose “time” it is, that’s nothing more than a meaningless platitude or a bumper sticker. An opponent armed with and more
importantly “willing” to use disproportionate force beats the people every time! Its got nothing to do with the righteousness of their case or
what fu(king time it is. Had the Army in Egypt decided to step in and use whatever means necessary, the uprising would have ended in a few days.
People like you protest in the “streets” against what is basically a benign police force and state that operates within the rule of law. Try it
against a tyrant who has no constraints. In 1931 the population of Ukraine was in open revolt over agricultural quotas so the Soviets sent the army
and secret police in to confiscate all food stores and sealed the borders. Two years later 10 million were dead of starvation. Good Western
progressive and liberal types did all they could to impose a news embargo and discredit the stories of the few survivors that managed to leak out.
Even as hard as the Ukrainians fought, they lost because the state had no internal or external restrictions, legal or ethical, on their use of force.
You want to write it off as it simply not being the Ukrainian people’s “time”, do so, but that’s got nothing to do with it.