It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The Moon is Artificial I can see the wierd structure with the telescope and camera clearly...bunker

page: 5
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in


posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 02:09 PM

Originally posted by ProRipp
I agree with Mr Mask if your trying to raise a serious point then be serious ?

I recently watched John Lears second Loooong interview with project camelot (dont ask why) where he mentioned he had been reading a book that suggested the moon was actually 'towed' into earths orbit eons ago ? Sorry but the authors name eludes me because I thought it too fantastical to believe !

Too fantastical..really?

More fantastical than a 15 Billion+ year old deity, that created the entire Multiverse and everything in it simply by will and thought?

Billions of humans don't consider that a fantastical proposition...many people live and die by their conviction of belief in this deity in one form or another...but a starship could never be fashioned from a small moon by an advanced species (for whatever purpose) and moved around in space, because it sounds too...out there?

posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 03:50 PM
Space Voyager Twelve Part 12 Orion Dragon Queens ...with Wormhole Creating "Un-Fallen" DNA
Feb 15, 2011, 01:01 PM

posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 04:37 PM
reply to post by NorkiSpaceDuck

I had harboured this vague, whimsical optimism that perhaps whatever you had ingested to alter your perception of reality may have worn off, at some point in time....

....guess I was mistaken.....

posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 05:36 PM
reply to post by weedwhacker

i realy loved the video beautiful picture and specialy the end ... thank you it's on my favorite

now i have a question

when i read about the creation of our solar systeme i'm a littel confused...this movie is theory ok ! because nobody experience it, nobody see it, but why this theory is more relevant than another, we saw in the past that many theory was false, so why this one would be better than others ?

posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 07:48 AM

Originally posted by Human_Alien

Originally posted by jpsdasnake

The Moon defines the night and day cicle because of its gravitational influence over the earth's rotation,causing the earth to rotate on a (aprox.)24 hours cycle.and that's what you call a "Day"
edit on 14/2/2011 by jpsdasnake because: added hyperlink

I am not alone in this theory but I think in time, science will realize the Moon has NOTHING to do with our gravity.
Earths core is what affects and defines gravity.

Because if you think about it, when the Moon is not above us (for 12 hours per day) how is it still affecting the tides? When the Moon is over Australia why does my ocean ebb and flow?

Like a magnetic and a piece of metal. If you remove the magnet or place it out of the metal's path, the metal WON'T move.

The Moon is very likely an artificial satellite and was place there for an agenda which I will not go into.

Native Indians spoke of Two Moons while others spoke of No Moon.

So, the Moon has not been a constant in Earth's history from what we can tell through written findings.

"nothing to do with our gravity"
Ok,i respect your theories Alien,but now you are just beeing ridiculous.

The moon doesnt have to be directly above us in order to affect the tides.

Here,see how tidal action works acording to the moon`s position:

Tidal Forces explanation
edit on 16/2/2011 by jpsdasnake because: added hyperlink

posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 11:48 AM
I have sat for many hours watching alot of U-tube vid's of anything from nibiru,aliens,area 51, dumbs etc and I have looked upon all of this as interesting and not discounted anything because everything can have merit.
Now I also use google earth alot and one of my fav's is area 51 which i have studied for hours and when I looked across the crater field there can be seen alot of towers coming up out of the ground in some of them.
Now to bring this back on topic during watching some of these U-tube clips i came across ones with pic's of bases on the moon that date back to around the time of the moon landings which would imply that they where made by someone/thing else.
Now some of these pic's show towers coming up out of craters on the moon surface and I couldn't help but notice the similarity to what I had seen on google earth in the crater field at area 51.
Athough i do agree that the moon was not here when the planet was created [i would have thought it would have become apart of earth] i don't think that its a spaceship or ark although its not impossible but maybe a moon from another planet caught by the earth as the planet came by

posted on Feb, 19 2011 @ 02:22 PM

Originally posted by TedHodgson
reply to post by ALadInsane

"report from china recently that they have found extrordinary things on the moon that america tried to cover up only makes things much more interesting"

edit on 14/2/11 by TedHodgson because: spelling

Link for this if true please.

posted on Feb, 20 2011 @ 09:15 AM

posted on Feb, 20 2011 @ 09:45 AM
reply to post by TedHodgson

That thread was amusing, and entertaining.

Unfortunately, the title was an exaggeration. May want to read the entire thread....especially the posts by the guy that SPEAKS CHINESE...and so do his wife and daughter....they properly translate the "news" item.....

posted on Feb, 20 2011 @ 10:13 AM
There is clearly something amiss with the moon. With all these moon theories that are going around at the moment I thought I would sit and watch it last night, not having anything better to do.

I periodically checked it over a 5 hour timespan, and each time it was in the correct position. All was fine. Nothing wrong here I thought.

That was when the moon seemed to flicker for a moment and I swear for a second it dimmed and then vanished completely. It came back within moments though and I was just left thinking wtf!
The closest analogy I can think of is when a flourescent bulb fails and it starts to blink and then fails.

Seriously what the hell is going on with the moon?

posted on Feb, 20 2011 @ 10:19 AM
reply to post by Lunartik

That was when the moon seemed to flicker for a moment and I swear for a second it dimmed and then vanished completely.

Ever think of clouds????

posted on Feb, 20 2011 @ 10:43 AM
wait, there were no clouds! I would surely have noticed clouds! Unless you imply that I am stupid.
I used to be interested in astrology as a child and would spend many an hour gazing at the heavens with my telescope. I never saw the moon do this though.

posted on Feb, 20 2011 @ 10:47 AM
your videos prove nothing, and im not going to go any further.

posted on Feb, 20 2011 @ 10:55 AM
these clips, along with the title, are the reasons why people don't take posters on ATS seriously. they are easily, and rightly dismissed. we should have a "fairy tale" section for these posts to be put in. it's actually embarrassing to be even associated with these people, as far as posting on ATS goes.

posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 12:16 PM
reply to post by TedHodgson

I'll read it now. Cheers for the link.

posted on Mar, 7 2011 @ 09:48 AM
the moons diameter and placement cant happen by nature

the nature the moon behaves in doesn't make sense

therefore the moon wasn't made by 'nature'

hence moon theory's and conspiracy towards the moon

posted on Mar, 7 2011 @ 10:48 AM
reply to post by Chadwickus

Now there's a good shot of the moon
Sorry OP, (i hope that means original poster or something similar, if not please correct me) but i'm not convinced.

posted on Mar, 7 2011 @ 11:16 AM
reply to post by 1beerplease

You are mistaken:

the moons diameter and placement cant happen by nature

It did. It is irrefutable.

the nature the moon behaves in doesn't make sense

You didn't specify what "doesn't make sense" there. However, you are mistaken again, because there are NO questions regarding the "behavior" of the behaves just as expected, and as measured, and is very fact, it can be predicted both forwards, and backwards using the laws of physics....orbital mechanics. A scientist named "Kepler" worked out the three laws of orbital motion many centuries ago. LAWS of motion, of celestial bodies. These laws, and the mathematics, are very very precise, measurable, and completely proven to be fact.

therefore the moon wasn't made by 'nature'

Therefore, your 'conclusion' is flat wrong.

You may wish to do some Internet searches to learn more. Look for Moon creation processes, the Moon's orbit, and the terms "gravitational lock"...sometimes called "tidal lock". Wikipedia has many many articles of course, as do other sources, from online searches.

You might venture out into the real world a library. Better, more complete information in books.....

You can even hunt on YouTube (I know...usually a "gag" reflex 90% of the time, but there ARE good videos there...some gems in the muck....).

edit on 7 March 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 7 2011 @ 08:04 PM
euh, these OP video's don't show much to me , other then very low res imagery.

how could this stand by the title of the thread, when there are a gazillion "high res" pictures out there, and video. Eventhough most of what's out there isn't trully 100% clear enough to show us what is really on the moon.
Anyway , ill'd rather look at Jose Escamilla's last video about the moon, if one really want's to see interresting imagery.

posted on Mar, 14 2011 @ 07:51 PM
Thank you for your post. If nothing else, you have raised some very valid questions that deserve adequate consideration.

The realm of possibilities is unbelievable.

top topics

<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in