It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO February 12th 2011 Mendocino California. [HOAX]

page: 6
41
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 03:21 AM
link   
Oh my that is some serious detective work right there! can you believe people go to this much trouble to fake something like this. I thought it was ludicrous to think that they were the same audio until Jonny did that comparison, unbelievable stuff.

October




posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 07:33 AM
link   
Ahhhh, yes. Glowing far-away speck just has to be the real deal this time.
It fits the criterior. Unidentified - yes, Flying - yes, Object - yes.
Must be a ufo, prepare for invasion...


Honestly, I cannot believe some of the comments.



posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 07:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Moose318
reply to post by CholmondleyWarner
 


Well I have to disagree that they are small pinpoints of light. They looked large enough to me once I selected full screen. Not every ufo has to be nuts/bolts and metal. There is much that we do not know in this universe, and have yet to discover. We are all made up of energy, It seems plausable to me that some ufo's may consist of light, or appear that way. i.e plasma. Unfortunetly 99% of all ufo videos in todays world are fake. Technology has come forward a great deal. The negative side of that in relation to ufo hunting is that that same technology allows average folk to hoax a sighting.

Theres only one way we will truly ever know the truth...That is to keep searching, keep looking up to the skies and do our best to try and document anything that is questionable, so sites like ATS can have a detailed and combined evaluation.

I am just like everyone else here, I am looking for clarity and truth. I will not always be able to make intelligent conclusions without my peers help. I do my best to respect everyone that I converse with, sometimes I fail. It is through respect and the common understanding of searching for truth, that we will someday get closer to understanding the enigma of our exsistence and the nature of this world we live in.
edit on 14-2-2011 by Moose318 because: (no reason given)


If the audio is questionable at the least, then the time of the video comes into question also. It just so happens that last fall Venus and Mercury were in close proximity to each other at that time of near-twilight in the western sky. My assumption is that if the audio was messed with, a video of the two planets could have been altered to seem to show a UFO.



posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 08:42 AM
link   
If the audio is questionable, and it without a doubt is ripped from an earlier video, then the whole thing is likely BS. Sometimes a popular clip will be edited with new audio and passed off as something else, but this really reeks of a hoax made by somebody who hijacked a YT account or just had a spare YT account laying around from ages ago. The YT account doesn't seem to have any actual activity until a day before the UFO video was posted



posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 09:19 AM
link   
It has been about 48 hrs and still no reply from YouTube member of video.
Likely will not ever get a response. They can at least confess to hoaxing it and what made them do it. As to the previous comment...The alleged ufo video was the only thing really of interest to get any views on their channel, beside the drive over the bridge.
edit on 15-2-2011 by Moose318 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 11:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Moose318
 


did anybody hear the sounds it appeared to produce towards the end, even the witnesses reacted to them. Im assuming they were quite loud.



posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 12:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by JPhish
not a sun dog

CGI is likely the culprit

audio taken from this video and slowed down.

www.youtube.com...
edit on 2/14/2011 by JPhish because: (no reason given)


ok, I have to know how you did that. Unless you made the second video, how in the hell did you pick up on that out of all of the videos on you tube?

edit to add:

I just saw your explanation on page 5, don't let people tell you different, you have super human abilities. That was awesome. They should build you a shrine.
edit on 15-2-2011 by network dude because: to fix my post.



posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 12:28 PM
link   
reply to post by network dude
 


You can find that information on page 5 of jphish's post.



posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Moose318
 


thanks, I edited my post after I found that. I wanted to make sure he knew that I think he is the shnizel.



posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 02:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Ghost Who Walks
Honestly, I cannot believe some of the comments.


Well, at least it's not the same people all the time. There does seem to be a learning curve, although it's pretty slow. After responding enthusiastically to about the third one that turns out to be a load of crap, some people at least start hedging themselves a little. They don't immediately turn into evil skeptical debunkers, but they at least approach a new sighting or video with a bit more caution than before.

I suppose that's some kind of progress.



posted on Feb, 15 2011 @ 02:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Blue Shift
 


I think a little measure is a good thing! I tend to respond to UFO videos with a measure of both sides. I would look at it as if it is not a hoax and then look at it as if it is a hoax. To me this looked at first like some sort of electric atmospheric phenomena (I've never seen ball lightning but the area and weather conditions seemed about right for it).

Maybe the original audio is a meteorologist explaining the phenomena and the video part is real?

Either way I think the most healthy response is to assume a video could be hoax or real, ufo or other explainable phenomena and just for everyone to explore ths possibilities by comparison to known phenomena and tells of a hoax.

Finally it can NEVER be proved a UFO is of an ET origin without actually catching and studying it physically. It can only be shown what it is not and that certain hoax tells are not there.



posted on Feb, 17 2011 @ 07:11 AM
link   
BTW...

Just as an update.. The original poster of this YouTube video has now edited out all the audio (which was taken from the other video), and replaced with a musical soundtrack.. He also has made a repost of the same footage but in a zoomed fashion.mode. The lengths some people will go to keep a hoax alive.. Hey, lets just repackage it for a whole new set of viewers.

And mark my words, some unknowingly innocent member will repost this footage here at ATS as a "WOW" video..



Above is the reposted zoomed version with the same type of eerie soundtrack



posted on Feb, 21 2011 @ 12:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Moose318
 


Possible star ship from Tesla why not.
Anything is possible.

more of the Tesla star ship story here

Enjoy.



posted on Feb, 21 2011 @ 12:45 PM
link   
To the OP, why do you say [HOAX] id you don't try to say why it is a hoax ?



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 12:37 AM
link   
reply to post by Fromabove
 


Unless he ran out of matches that might be another star ship sighting.
Seemingly unconvincing as a hoax or real event.

So far from star ships sightings I'd say they stay for a lot longer than that.



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 01:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Fromabove
 


You did read the thread right???? When I started the thread I did not call it a hoax. Members on here, pointed out some information regarding audio. From that information we can assume that this video is a hoax.



posted on Mar, 2 2011 @ 04:27 PM
link   
click on copyright in the reader


See "The government conceals ..... controlled mass media".

Its practically impossible to tell if flashing lights are unknown ships but they might as well be.

Up against a "criminally maintained" network who are we to believe.



new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join