It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JPhish
not a sun dog
CGI is likely the culprit
audio taken from this video and slowed down.
www.youtube.com...edit on 2/14/2011 by JPhish because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by JPhish
not a sun dog
CGI is likely the culprit
audio taken from this video and slowed down.
www.youtube.com...edit on 2/14/2011 by JPhish because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by JPhish
not a sun dog
CGI is likely the culprit
audio taken from this video and slowed down.
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by harrytuttle
Out of all the UFO videos floating around on Youtube, how did you figure that out?
Was it memory of watching that older video? Please explain how you made the connection.
Just seems a little suspicious that you point out the connection without explaining how you did it, is all.
I'm not saying you are the person who created the hoax video in the OP, but it seems just a bit too convenient without any explanation.
edit on 14-2-2011 by harrytuttle because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CholmondleyWarner
Can you sue someone for false advertisement!?
The title said this was interesting but it Isn't. I have long since stoppped being overly excited by distant pin points of light far off in the sky!
It could literally be anything... It could literally be quite close or far away... But it is quite literally uninteresting....
Originally posted by walltofloor
Hi everyone, pretty new to ATS (today in fact) The video is fascinating but i couldn't help notice that the audio is very similar to this other ufo vid www.youtube.com... It sounds like the voices have been slowed down a notch. If you fast forward to the end of the vid on both they both say 'okay that was just weird' complete with the little chuckle in exactly the same way.
*Sorry, didn't get a chance to read page 3. Looks like this has already been covered*edit on 14-2-2011 by walltofloor because: (no reason given)