It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Jihadi who helped train 7/7 bomber freed by US after just five years

page: 1
7

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Jihadi who helped train 7/7 bomber freed by US after just five years


www.guardian.co.uk

Exclusive: Release prompts claim Islamist was US informant while assisting London terrorist.

An American jihadist who set up the terrorist training camp where the leader of the 2005 London suicide bombers learned how to manufacture explosives, has been quietly released after serving only four and a half years of a possible 70-year sentence, a Guardian investigation has learned.

The unreported sentencing of Mohammed Junaid Babar to "time served" because of what a New York judge described as "exceptional co-operation" that began even before his arrest has raised questions over w
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   
Once again, the idea that 7/7 was a False Flag event to manipulate the British public like the US public was manipulated with 9/11 raises it's head.

This fellow, is definitely looking like a candidate for the 'feeder'. The person in any conspiracy that has direct access to intelligence agency handlers. If this turns out to be true - that the US intelligence agencies had foreknowledge and direct input into the arrangements of the 7/7 bombings, the SWHTF very quickly.

Yet again, the policy of 'emergency situation creation' to justify criminal acts has been spotted. Will we see any action about this however?

The Revenant.

www.guardian.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 05:32 PM
link   
Star and Flag! A really important news story. Let's hope it doesn't get buried.

A remark from the sentencing judge that Babar "began co-operating even before his arrest", has raised the possibility, supported by other circumstantial evidence obtained by the Guardian, that he may have been an informant for the US government before his detention by the FBI in April 2004.

For me this removes all doubts they had a heads up about what was going to happen. Jesus Christ. Couple this with the security drills on the exact same day the attacks took place and the only logical conclusion is they allowed it to happen.

Thanks OP I'm showing this to a few doubters tomorrow.



posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 05:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Big Raging Loner
 


Please do, spread the word.

The more cracks we can highlight in the official story, the more we can hope for the truth to appear.

The Rev.



posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 06:01 PM
link   
reply to post by The Revenant
 


I'm interested to read other user's opinions and/or criticisms of the "Ripple Effect"

Peace
edit on 13/2/11 by awake_and_aware because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 06:07 PM
link   
It was an inside job...they let that guy go after 5 years because they probably had nothing on him to begin with and he is no threat.



posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 06:48 PM
link   
Unless he told them where Osama bin Laden was hiding there is absolutely no reason he should have been freed. That's just sick.



posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 07:27 PM
link   
Or it cold be payback, since it has come to light, that the previous UKGovernment, was involved up to its elbows over the release off the Lockerbie Bomber. Just a coincidense, that this individual is released a couples of days after the report into the release of the Lockerbie Bomber came out.



posted on Feb, 14 2011 @ 01:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by tooo many pills
Unless he told them where Osama bin Laden was hiding there is absolutely no reason he should have been freed. That's just sick.


of course there is....the obvious reason is the authorities knew what was going regarding the london attacks and let it happen..that the authorities were involved in the murder of all those people killed in london..

its happened before....and this release is highly suspicious...



posted on Feb, 14 2011 @ 01:28 AM
link   
IMO this actually enforces the official story. Now we have a reason why that 'drill' was going on. If this guy informed the law enforcement of certain details of the bombing it would make sense that the police would react in some manner. To keep it under wraps they would logically make it an excersise to avoid panic and tipping off the terrorist about their forknowledge.



posted on Feb, 14 2011 @ 01:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by PsykoOps
IMO this actually enforces the official story. Now we have a reason why that 'drill' was going on. If this guy informed the law enforcement of certain details of the bombing it would make sense that the police would react in some manner. To keep it under wraps they would logically make it an excersise to avoid panic and tipping off the terrorist about their forknowledge.


how does locking this guy up for only 2 years back up the official story?

to me it looks very much like he was promised a very short (and probably comfy) sentence if he played along...who knows what else hes been given..



posted on Feb, 14 2011 @ 07:53 AM
link   
If he was not involved directly with the 7/7 and was in fact working as an informant? Not sure why they'd lock him up in the first place. Maybe he started out as a real deal but then started to co-operate instead of being placed there on purpose by agency.



posted on Feb, 14 2011 @ 12:01 PM
link   
Sounds like payback for releasing the Lockerbie bomber to me.



posted on Feb, 18 2011 @ 11:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by awake_and_aware
reply to post by The Revenant
 


I'm interested to read other user's opinions and/or criticisms of the "Ripple Effect"




Still interested in other user's opinions/thoughts.
edit on 18/2/11 by awake_and_aware because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
7

log in

join