It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO over White House

page: 2
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 12 2011 @ 06:00 AM
link   
Sorry to repeat but it's bugging me : why would we have a pic of a plane there if it's a no-fly zone? Maybe it's not even really there and has been digitally added?
edit on 12-2-2011 by Hitoshura because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 12 2011 @ 06:29 AM
link   
reply to post by Hitoshura
 


It's not over the White House, it's probably several miles away, whereas the White house appears to be less than a mile away.




edit on 12/2/11 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2011 @ 06:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Hitoshura
 


It's not over the White House, it's probably several miles away, whereas the White house appears to be less than a mile away.




edit on 12/2/11 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)



Ah right, cheers. Was thinking that pic actually had the Whitehouse in the distance and that plane was almost over it. I'm not from the US though so making that mistake doesn't bother me too much!



posted on Feb, 12 2011 @ 12:19 PM
link   
Hey... did anyone else get sent to some stupid "trojan checker" site when they clicked on the video? I am not sure why I did, but if anyone else did to, I would recommend this thread be removed immediately!



posted on Feb, 12 2011 @ 01:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hitoshura
I'm not from the US though so making that mistake doesn't bother me too much!


For some reason the phrase "deny ignorance" pops to mind




posted on Feb, 12 2011 @ 02:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by Hitoshura
I'm not from the US though so making that mistake doesn't bother me too much!


For some reason the phrase "deny ignorance" pops to mind



Agreed, and it's bugging me now so am off to check where it is from that pics point of view. Ok, finally got it. Hopefully the White House is on the very left of that pic then, or even further off left than the actual pic.
edit on 12-2-2011 by Hitoshura because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2011 @ 02:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by illuminatuscadabra
So maybe they can work CG in digitally, however it doesn't mean they were in the air real time. So Eye would second the request for the eyes to the sky. None of the feeds can be seen as truly live. Seeing is not necessarily believing anymore. Wonder... was there ever really a time when the camera didn't lie?

Yes years ago the camera didn't lie. It learned how to do that with the help of humans. Not only did it not lie but its product was worth 1000 words! Now with inflation a picture is only worth the paper its printed on or the bits it uses in your computer.
edit on 12-2-2011 by karen61057 because: because I needed to add a word to a sentence that would not have made much sense without it! LOL.



posted on Feb, 12 2011 @ 09:26 PM
link   
Hate to add more fuel to the hoaxers but the second pic has the same solid light seemingly in the background on the left side of the sky like it's moved further away.

Nice artwork but if they think they're fooling ATS, no chance



posted on Feb, 12 2011 @ 09:40 PM
link   
reply to post by WhizPhiz
 



It has become my experience that whenever a UFO or anything extraordinary appears in a video along with music, it's usually a hoax.
I'd say 9.9 times out of 10, it's not real. After all, who would have to presence of mind to include music if their intent was to just get the information out asap?

It's staging. It's sensationalism. It's showcasing. It's all that and more.

So heed the warning for all future UFO videos from now until Dec 21 2012



posted on Feb, 12 2011 @ 09:49 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


Or even October 28th 2011 if you read some posts around ATS.

Funny idea though, are the majority of hoaxes made by people having a laugh or people purposefully discrediting for the alleged "false flag" scenario?



posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 12:28 AM
link   
Well it's the 13th now? Has anything been seen? Should this now be moved to the hoax section?

EDIT: Sorry, I guess they have until the end of today.


edit on 13-2-2011 by WhizPhiz because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 06:28 AM
link   
I think this can safely be moved to the hoax forum now, this is quoted directly from the portal report website:



Last night, before I want to bed, I saw a huge commercial airliner, right in the middle of the web cam screen, over the White House . So, I thought to myself: "Ok, there goes the No Fly Zone theory". Then, this morning, I wake up and load the web cam. I see a long exposure of red car lights that extend down a street for about as long as the lights in the sky were captured yesterday. I have to be honest, and I don't want to knowingly spread disinformation. I have come to the conclusion that the photos I showed in the YouTube videos are long exposure pictures of planes or helicopters. Please accept my apology. It was a false alarm. However, I still wish to watch the skies of Washington, and hopefully there will be some real evidence.

Leonard



posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 08:00 AM
link   
reply to post by WhizPhiz
 


At least this seems to be an honest mistake and not an intentional hoax. Those are acceptable, if not a bit trigger-happy, so to speak.



posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 08:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by WhizPhiz
I think this can safely be moved to the hoax forum now, this is quoted directly from the portal report website:


It's still the 13th.


Maybe wait until it's the 14th?



posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 12:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Seitler
 




At least this seems to be an honest mistake and not an intentional hoax

No, well it is still a hoax. Because the actual Agency guys never appeared in their crafts over the white house like they said they would. They've been trying so hard for so long to gain credibility but all they've done is lose all hopes of gaining any credibility by making false predictions.



posted on Feb, 14 2011 @ 07:07 AM
link   
So it looks like another epic fail for "The Agency" I can't say I'm surprised really. If anyone out there wants a good laugh you should check out the T's & C's for the Portal Report forum. I especially like the part that says that you can get banned just for "annoying" the bloke who's running the site now. And I can confirm that he means it as I've had 3 accounts banned so far!


Happy Monday everyone.


Rev



posted on Feb, 14 2011 @ 08:10 AM
link   
just one thing about the pic is why aren't any of the cars seen as lines in the long exposure shots?



posted on Feb, 14 2011 @ 08:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Slipdig1
just one thing about the pic is why aren't any of the cars seen as lines in the long exposure shots?


Looks like this is one :




new topics

top topics



 
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join