reply to post by stereologist
Hello Again Stereologist.
"This is not a matter of right or wrong. On the contrary this is a matter of discerning normal from abnormal."
Interestingly, you could have completed the above thoughts with something in the vein of "...from my point of view.", and everyone participating on
this thread would, most probably, have offered a pat on the back to you...
There are multitudes of perspectives at work in this "reality", my friend. And to each and every one of those Individuals, their own point of view
is their dominant tool when used for interacting with their world; for it's through this "prism" that they determine what values to apply to events
which they consider as being "right or wrong", "normal or abnormal", "hot or cold", "better or worse", "superior or inferior", etc.
Your own perspective on the subject matter at hand is, understandably, important to you. And I myself have commented on its very "reasonability".
But for some reason or another, the strategy you adopt when interacting with the other participants in this thread appears to be one of both cynicism
But as stated previously, "...good for you." Make your choices, for they are yours to make.
You gracefully concluded your post with: (Now that's a "claim" - especially the "gracefully" part)
"Interestingly, the only "claim" I've noticed in the entirety of this thread is your own proclamation of how these overt indications are only
"natural" and that they don't indicate anything else...and again, good for you."
"That is an obvious false statement isn't it? Let's check that claim of yours, shall we? Also, I was responding to a claim that certain events were
indicators of this change in whatever."
the above observation followed by your "evidence"...evidence you introduced with your initial "claim" of my being a LIAR::
Here are other claims:
"The influx of new energies surrounding cycles transitions would mainly effect people from within, for most people an awakening is something private
that they don't go screaming from rooftops."
"So we can use physical events instead, often reported in news media(although be careful of msm doesn't try to skew perception either) to gauge how
the transition is effecting the husk that is the physical world ..."
"There is little use denying that we live in a non-localized, transluminally interconnected quantum holographic universe."
"One last thing i wanted to add is that it has been seen that every 5th DAY of each Consciousness cycle produces its "masterpiece" meaning the
greatest event that contributes to the development of that Consciousness cycle."
"Change, revolution, rejection of establishment, crumbling of the old pyramidal power structures, rebellion against tptb, mass awakening etc.....
this is starting to spread throughout the world."
"Light, vibration and magnetism play an important part in the transfer/exchange of energy, and basically our survival, i.e. exchange and movement of
ions within our own cells and DNA as well as plants and animals. The sun our source is responsible for all. Our great sun will be the major cleanser
of our planet."
What you view as a "claim", I [usually] encounter as "a statement reflective of an opinion" - this premise generally being governed by
To me Stereologist, I don't reflexively take the position that if a given Individual makes this or that statement that they are necessarily making a
"claim". Rather, I choose to interpret all the above as merely folks offering reflections of their own beliefs, and nothing more than that. For
me, it's all about beliefs and because of those beliefs and the resultant perspectives, the choices we make. It's also specifically about points of
view; that they can differ, that they can be offered without being branded as this or that.
Because of assumptions you make concerning the very premise of a given/offered statement, you choose to employ the strategy of determining that "...a
claim has been made..." and, rather than considering some of the possibilities of the entire dynamic, you quickly draw your sword from its well-worn
It's not about the evidence Stereologist as much as it is about "interpretation OF the evidence"; that the very same "evidence" can mean
different things to different Individuals.
And, for me, therein lies the crux of the matter; the interaction that you and I have been enjoying is now at an end...for only one of us is
And anyway, why would you wish to interact with such a LIAR as myself?
My sincerest Thank You for all your thoughts, and
My Very Best Wishes To You And Your Family.