Interview Raises Questions Over Weapons Of Mass Effect In San Diego

Interview Raises Questions Over Weapons Of Mass Effect In SD

www.10news.com

"So, specifically, you're looking for the dirty bomb? You're looking for the nuclear device?" asked Blacher.

"Correct. Weapons of mass effect," Hallor said.

"You ever found one?" asked Blacher.

"Not at this location," Hallor said.

"But they have found them?" asked Blacher.

"Yes," said Hallor.

(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.10news.com
www.10news.com
www.10news.com

Nukes found in San Diego!?

If you watch the video, you'll see that the officer being interviewed is quickly interrupted by the Public Relations officer.

Links to the videos and raw unedited videos are above!

Pay attention to what they say at the end of the edited news story. This is a HUGE revelation people!

www.10news.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

Maybe there were returning it to George Bush, Return to to sender?

reply to post by mr20121221

Jokes aside, that Port of San Diego guy knows something - and he basically admitted they have found a dirty bomb in San Diego apparently in the past year (according to the reporter).

Crazy they kept it a secret for this long. I bet that guy is out of a job.

reply to post by harrytuttle


Yeah, no matter how nervous you are, why would you even hint at the fact that they have found nuclear weapons, yet alone actually admit to having found some before getting cut off by PR... Something smells fishy, and it ain't the port

wow that guy won't be up for an oscar anytime soon.

more was said in that video while the cop "wasn't" talking.

watch those ports!! (especially the tawny ones)

reply to post by SpreadLoveNotHate

In what way is it smelling fishy? Please explain what your suspicions are.

I think the guy wasn't ready for that question, and he for some stupid reason (nervousness of being on TV) answered honestly, but then realized that he probably shouldn't, especially if the Public Relations women (who was off camera) began shaking her head or waving her hands for him not to answer that question.

I guess if anyone is to blame, it's the PR woman, because she should have known what the questions were going to be before the interview started, so she could coach the Officer guy on how to answer.

I'm amazed that this sort of info has got out, so props for posting! What does this tell us? Are TPTB planning another False Flag or are terrorists really getting that good?

reply to post by concernedcitizen519

It seems to me that the way he answered was with some pride - that maybe they really did stop a real attack from occurring. He didn't seem disturbed by it.

That's my take.

Could this be what they're talking about?
www.atf.gov...

Originally posted by harrytuttle
Crazy they kept it a secret for this long. I bet that guy is out of a job.

You know who else is out of a job? The idiot who tried to smuggle the expensive rogue nuke through a US port. There was a very angry terrorist at the other end of that shipment

Originally posted by concernedcitizen519
Could this be what they're talking about?
www.atf.gov...

It could be, but I doubt it because the question from the reporter was about "dirty bombs" (nuclear material). That much was clear.

Besides, that case was back in 2008, and the TV news clip suggested that they were talking about the last year (2010).

reply to post by upgrayedd

That's for sure - I bet that whatever they caught cost some terrorist a lot of money. Goes to show, crime doesn't pay!

Originally posted by concernedcitizen519
Could this be what they're talking about?
www.atf.gov...

Probably, the definition of a WMD seems to change daily to suit the propoganda,,

Just my opinion, but what I hear the Asst Dir answer to the initial question is "Yes... welllllll" before being interrupted by his watchdog. My conclusions from watching the whole video are different from the 'news' station's. It is likely the man was trying to qualify his answer to mean something other than what it said on the face of things.

Usually- in my experience anyway- when people use that particular qualification "Yes... welllll" what they then say is "Not THAT thing specifically". As in he was going to say- before being interrupted- "wellll, not NUCLEAR devices, but other types of WME's."

There are many other devices referred to as weapons of mass effect.

My opinion isn't worth much, though.

Peace
Montana

reply to post by Montana

That's a good point. It's hard to tell whether the distinction he was attempting to make was between weapon type or weapon location. Shortly later he does say qualify a response with "not in this port".

It sucks he got cut off. Darn those Public Relations people!

S&F on this one, his reaction, body language, and answers seemed (to me) to point that there was much more to say, he just couldn't or was so nervous he couldn't get a straight answer to come out. Very interesting on this one.

Good, good stuff! Someone didn't have their afternoon coffee.

The underwear bomber was a proven a total fraud and they used him to justify the kiddyporn scanners.
I doubt this time is any different.
Lie lie lie lie lie lie truth....
naw....
not likely.

Unless it was one of the Nukes that got flown across the country and all the army whistleblowers got arkencided, or related to the satellite photos of the radiation hotspot under the Israeli Embassy that was in the news before that.

be afraid be very afraid....

Seriously why go dirty bomb when they can get the job done with box cutters and little bottles of shampoo....