It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ProphetEzekiel
reply to post by mnemeth1
Good video!
He has a solid point; yet I disagree.
The PATRIOT Act should be renewed.
Why?
Here is my reasoning;
1; the Patriot Act was created following 9/11 to stop terrorism in the United States.
2; there have been no terrorist acts in America since it was enacted.
What's my point?
My point is;
1; if the Patriot Act is renewed, we can hold the government accountable for any terrorist activities;
the people: "why didn't the government tell us of this attack; they have been monitoring the people for years!"
2; if the Patriot Act is not renewed, the government can avoid the blame for any terrorist attacks;
the government; "the American people didn't want the Patriot Act, we tried to protect you, you wanted your Freedom more than your Life. it is regrettable, but it is not the fault of the government, it is the fault of the people."
renewed; we are safe from the Evil of our government.
not renewed; we are open to harm done by the government. ["false-flag" operations.]
It is not the Patriot Act that is the problem, it is the government, the system.
Originally posted by DevilJin
Keep dreaming. Yeah, you can hold your government accountable but will it matter? No. They will say "We need more control...to secure your safety from Muslims - I mean, terrorists." The Patriot Act does not stop any and all terrorists and will not stop the government from doing false-flag events to strengthen their control over the people. What needs to happen is the Patriot Act be not renewed and the government does a better job of stopping terrorism while the people do a better job of standing TOGETHER and be critical and wary of the government. You also need a genuine media that is completely neutral or at least supportive of the people. Good luck getting that one...
Originally posted by ProphetEzekiel
Originally posted by DevilJin
Keep dreaming. Yeah, you can hold your government accountable but will it matter? No. They will say "We need more control...to secure your safety from Muslims - I mean, terrorists." The Patriot Act does not stop any and all terrorists and will not stop the government from doing false-flag events to strengthen their control over the people. What needs to happen is the Patriot Act be not renewed and the government does a better job of stopping terrorism while the people do a better job of standing TOGETHER and be critical and wary of the government. You also need a genuine media that is completely neutral or at least supportive of the people. Good luck getting that one...
True,
but which would be more profitable to their goal;
showing that they cannot protect the nation.(renew)
or
showing that the nation cannot protect itself.(don''t renew)
if it is not renewed and a terrorist attack happens, they have a greater excuse to permanently take away even more of our rights.
Originally posted by ProphetEzekiel
Here is my reasoning;
1; the Patriot Act was created following 9/11 to stop terrorism in the United States.
2; there have been no terrorist acts in America since it was enacted.
Originally posted by AP-Chris
reply to post by ProphetEzekiel
The Patriot Act is an assualt on the rights of Americans and should not be renewed.
Do you support torture because "Good Intel" was gained through it?
The United States cannot portray itself has the bastion of freedom and democracy while erroding the rights of it's citizens and lowering itself to torture. We are supposed to live by a higher standard and be a shining light to the world. Sometimes we will take casualties because of this - that is the price of our freedom.
I do not trust anyone who would sell out our freedom for security.
Originally posted by coolottie
reply to post by mnemeth1
This is one of those speeches that will live on in history. Even with the Patriot Act not being renewed there is still the case of "probable cause", it is the most missused unjust two words ever in a law. You can be pickup thrown in jail and held indefinitely without charges filled against you just on "probable cause". I know people that were searched because there was a baby bag in the car, the officer said it was "probable cause" because people were known to hide drugs in their baby's diaper bag. They kicked in a lady's door not long ago, throw a tear gas canister in the room caugth the house on fire, and they did not even have a warrant, they said it was "probable cause" because it was the purps last known address. When all they had to do is knock on the door and asked if he lived there. So they also need to take the "probable cause" out. I don't think the founding fathers put that in there.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Hold on guys..
This was the temporary renewal of only 3 parts of the PA, which is a document the size of a large cities phone book.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by mnemeth1
Well this is great, I do not agree with Ron or Rand Paul that much along with many Ron Paul supporters, but this is really good. I admit I did assume that these new tea party candidates would end up much the same as their republican counterparts but it appears they are taking a step in the right direction. Although there are many other things I believe rand paul is getting wrong such as his focus on strengthening government oversight on abortion, which I believe only expands government further.
I would strongly support legislation restricting federal courts from hearing cases like Roe v. Wade. Such legislation would only require a majority vote, making it more likely to pass than a pro-life constitutional amendment.
I would support legislation, a Sanctity of Life Amendment, establishing the principle that life begins at conception. This legislation would define life at conception in law, as a scientific statement.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by mnemeth1
Well this is great, I do not agree with Ron or Rand Paul that much along with many Ron Paul supporters, but this is really good. I admit I did assume that these new tea party candidates would end up much the same as their republican counterparts but it appears they are taking a step in the right direction. Although there are many other things I believe rand paul is getting wrong such as his focus on strengthening government oversight on abortion, which I believe only expands government further.