It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I also think the state should get out of marriage altogether, but since they offer benefits to married people, that's not going to happen for a while, but I would totally support independent marriage
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Originally posted by NthOther
The real question is why government licenses are necessary in the first place. Marriage licenses, in the US, were originally intended to prevent interracial marriage. It had nothing to do with "sanctity". Once the government realized they could use it as a method of social control, they also saw they could make a lot of money charging fees for the licenses.
It's not really about who can get married and who can't--marriage is an abstract interpersonal commitment--it's about who can get a license to benefit from the legal jungle they've set up to regulate the transfer of property and the custody of children.
Simply put, the government has no legitimate business in defining or regulating interpersonal relationships whatsoever. Its motivation is nefarious at best, and downright evil at worst.
Originally posted by BenIndaSun
I read through the posts and did not see one from a gay person.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I understand how it happened in Canada and I understand your concerns, but it's a slightly different situation here, I believe. Having said that, any way it has to happen is OK with me, as long as all citizens are treated equally. It's a Constitutional issue of equal treatment for me. And always has been.
Originally posted by gncnew
Just my two cents here but in general I have no issue with it as long as we don't try to impose this upon any religious institutions (i.e. suing because church x won't marry me and my life companion).
Problem solved right?
Originally posted by youdidntseeme
Juest read this article here:
Baltimore Sun
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
She is smart. She gets it. As do many kids unless they are raised by parents who teach them ignorance.
So I ask you this, membership of ATS, what are your thoughts on the issue.
Originally posted by SevenBeans
Do you think it's unconstitutional for the government not to recognize a marraige between adult male brothers, between a grandfather and an adult grandson?
Originally posted by SevenBeans
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I understand how it happened in Canada and I understand your concerns, but it's a slightly different situation here, I believe. Having said that, any way it has to happen is OK with me, as long as all citizens are treated equally. It's a Constitutional issue of equal treatment for me. And always has been.
Do you think it's unconstitutional for the government not to recognize a marraige between adult male brothers, between a grandfather and an adult grandson?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I understand how it happened in Canada and I understand your concerns, but it's a slightly different situation here, I believe. Having said that, any way it has to happen is OK with me, as long as all citizens are treated equally. It's a Constitutional issue of equal treatment for me. And always has been.
.edit on 2/11/2011 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
There's no reason why gays and lesbians can't marry each other. Hell, it shouldn't even have been a debate in the first place. No one has the right to tell you who you can't love. No one.