Wanted for war crimes against humanity, page 1

privacy

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times

Topic started on 10-2-2011 @ 04:32 AM by mr20121221

These two criminals are wanted by the world, If you see them report them to the police!

DU weapons & war crimes
After 3 years of investigation by 60 expert witnesses and jurists at a cost of $1 million raised by Japanese citizens, the International Criminal Tribunal For Afghanistan at Tokyo on March 10, 2004 found President George W. Bush guilty of the war crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes for the use of depleted uranium (DU) weapons by US forces in the 2001 war against Afghanistan.
Experts agree that a substantial portion of the depleted uranium in the DU weapons used by the US in Afghanistan came from Canadian uranium. Had the Tokyo Tribunal been diligent, it could have found Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, who resigned as Prime Minister on December 12, 2003, guilty as an accessory to genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, for failing to enforce Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission regulations, and the Canada-US Nuclear Cooperation Agreement, both of which prohibit Canadian uranium from being used in DU weapons.

reply posted on 10-2-2011 @ 05:30 AM by TribeOfManyColours

Bush is war criminal

Bush is quilty

edit on 10-2-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)

Bang bang Bush

edit on 10-2-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)

Above top secret

edit on 10-2-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 10-2-2011 @ 08:51 AM by kwakakev

The article here was back in July 2007. There has been building pressure for this with more and more sources are working together to take down the evil empire. The ongoing reports of what DU has done to the regions where it was used is devastating and is a definite weapon of mass destruction considering its half live and how long it remains in the environment. It is very sad and pathetic how little regard is placed on the full implications of some technology that is used.

reply posted on 10-2-2011 @ 10:23 PM by Rockpuck

reply to post by mr20121221

I laugh every time I see "International Law" "International Court" "World Court" "World Criminal Tribunal"

I have only one word for the ignorant Progressives and their NWO dreams: Sovereignty!

reply posted on 19-2-2011 @ 12:53 AM by TheImmaculateD1

A little thing called "Diplomatic Immunity" is in play here whereas they thought that without a shadow of doubt that they were working 100% in the best interest of the nation so this means no jail. The protection is in play for the rest of his and Cheney's lives. Rumsfeild and Rove however are not covered.

However, 43 no longer holds the legal authourity to exonerate anyone anymore.

edit on 19-2-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 19-2-2011 @ 01:32 AM by kwakakev

reply to post by TheImmaculateD1

By what authority did this decision come? Saddam Hussein had no diplomatic immunity in his role of head of state. He was completely self righteous in his actions over the trial matter. The only difference I see is Saddam was on the losing side of the war, is that enough to justify this decision? I do not see the growing demand for answers fading until the issues are resolved.

reply posted on 19-2-2011 @ 01:41 AM by FarArcher

You're telling me that JAPS are talking about US actions as war crimes?

Are these the same Japs that engaged in the rape of Nanking? Sticking kids with their bayonets, shooting civilians in the back of the head, chopping off civilian head with samurai swords, engaging in horrid medical experiments on Chinese civilians, shot US POW's, raped the hell out of Phillipino women and girls?

The same Japs?

My personal message would be that they can take their kangaroo court, hold hands with the court members, pucker up and French kiss my ***.

Depleted uranium! Right here on the beaches, we have more radioactive isotopes with larger levels of active decay than DU uses.

Just because it has the word "uranium" in it doesn't make it bomb quality.

And as a matter of fact, had they not attacked the US, and had they surrendered when told to, Nagasaki and Hiroshima would never have occurred.

Sounds like these guys need a radium enema.

reply posted on 25-2-2011 @ 02:31 PM by SevenThunders

I'll take this seriously when they issue indictments against the Taliban and Pakistan for their monstrous genocide against Christians. Until then all I can say is, if you sow to the wind you shall reap the whirlwind. All this is is a political leftist whine fest.

Maybe they should indict the Clintons for their suspicious trail of dead bodies, during their reign as hill-billy gangsters in Arkansas.

reply posted on 26-3-2011 @ 10:45 PM by korathin

Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by mr20121221

I laugh every time I see "International Law" "International Court" "World Court" "World Criminal Tribunal"

I have only one word for the ignorant Progressives and their NWO dreams: Sovereignty!

Aye, every time foreign trash bashes America instead of looking at their own home first it ticks me off. Heck the Canadians all the way up to the 1970's-80's where engaged in ethnic genocide of the various indigenous people in their country(Japan "officially" just got done wiping out it's indigenous population{down to 50,000 from a population of million or so]).

Pages: ^^TOP^^