Wanted for war crimes against humanity, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times
Topic started on 10-2-2011 @ 04:32 AM by mr20121221
These two criminals are wanted by the world, If you see them report them to the police!


DU weapons & war crimes
After 3 years of investigation by 60 expert witnesses and jurists at a cost of $1 million raised by Japanese citizens, the International Criminal Tribunal For Afghanistan at Tokyo on March 10, 2004 found President George W. Bush guilty of the war crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes for the use of depleted uranium (DU) weapons by US forces in the 2001 war against Afghanistan.
Experts agree that a substantial portion of the depleted uranium in the DU weapons used by the US in Afghanistan came from Canadian uranium. Had the Tokyo Tribunal been diligent, it could have found Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, who resigned as Prime Minister on December 12, 2003, guilty as an accessory to genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, for failing to enforce Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission regulations, and the Canada-US Nuclear Cooperation Agreement, both of which prohibit Canadian uranium from being used in DU weapons.


reply posted on 10-2-2011 @ 05:30 AM by TribeOfManyColours
Bush is war criminal

Bush is quilty
edit on 10-2-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)


Bang bang Bush

edit on 10-2-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)


Above top secret
edit on 10-2-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 10-2-2011 @ 10:23 PM by Rockpuck
reply to post by mr20121221



I laugh every time I see "International Law" "International Court" "World Court" "World Criminal Tribunal"



I have only one word for the ignorant Progressives and their NWO dreams: Sovereignty!




reply posted on 19-2-2011 @ 01:32 AM by kwakakev
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1



By what authority did this decision come? Saddam Hussein had no diplomatic immunity in his role of head of state. He was completely self righteous in his actions over the trial matter. The only difference I see is Saddam was on the losing side of the war, is that enough to justify this decision? I do not see the growing demand for answers fading until the issues are resolved.


reply posted on 26-3-2011 @ 10:45 PM by korathin
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to
post by mr20121221



I laugh every time I see "International Law" "International Court" "World Court" "World Criminal Tribunal"



I have only one word for the ignorant Progressives and their NWO dreams: Sovereignty!



Aye, every time foreign trash bashes America instead of looking at their own home first it ticks me off. Heck the Canadians all the way up to the 1970's-80's where engaged in ethnic genocide of the various indigenous people in their country(Japan "officially" just got done wiping out it's indigenous population{down to 50,000 from a population of million or so]).
Pages:     ^^TOP^^