It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Danbones
The political use of the terms as opposed to the moral use of the word "right"...
Labeling political statements by such Hegelian terms as left and right has been shown to be a completely totalitarian brainwashing concept designed to prevent independent thought.
If i protest i ALSO protest peacefully - However I am neither left or right wing , I do not subscribe to this false paradigm , Therefore to me and others your op is flawed ,
In July 2000, USDA officials claimed in our court hearing that, “The farmers have no rights. No right to be heard before the court, no right to independent testing, and no right to question the USDA.” Linda Faillace
* "There is no absolute right to consume or feed children any particular food."
* "There is no 'deeply rooted' historical tradition of unfettered access to foods of all kinds." [p. 26]
* "Plaintiffs' assertion of a 'fundamental right to their own bodily and physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to consume for themselves and their families' is similarly unavailing because plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish."
* "There is no fundamental right to freedom of contract."
FDA's Response to FTCLDF Suit
Section 242. Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law: Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such inhabitant being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if death results shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
stopthedrugwar.org...
Originally posted by lucid eyes
When right-wingers protest, such as at the Tea-Party, they protest peacefully, holding up pickets or eating hot dogs or engaging in debate. When left-wingers protest, they riot, shout, throw tantrums, commit acts of violence, vandalize cars and buildings, assault police. Why is that so?
Originally posted by lucid eyesI wont pass judgement on which type of protest is better or worse, but I´ll say that right/left are really two different worlds with two totally different brains.Of course progressives learn from their heroes and literature. These are some Che Guevara quotes that reveal a mentality that could easily incite violence.
Originally posted by lucid eyesDiscuss: How should we deal with the hate? How should we deal with rioting protestors? Is violence a legitimate means of protest?
Originally posted by lucid eyesIn my view more is destroyed with rage than achieved.
Originally posted by whaaa
Here's your right wing protests....
Originally posted by Frankenchrist
You mad OP?
Originally posted by Cuervo
This isn't a very good connection. You show me an out-of-control rioting liberal and I'll show you two right-winged bubba-effected gun-toting domestic terrorists.
Have you ever attended right-wing and left-wing protests? I have. They are two different worlds. Im just trying to find out what motivates the left to conduct themselves the way they do.
Originally posted by crimvelvet
Just out of curiosity. Did you notice if there was any difference in the "normal" age for each group???
Originally posted by works4dhs
Originally posted by Cuervo
This isn't a very good connection. You show me an out-of-control rioting liberal and I'll show you two right-winged bubba-effected gun-toting domestic terrorists.
what gun-toting right-wing terrorists? I am not aware of any conservative/right terrorist acts in the US in the last 50 years aside from T McVeigh.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
So your gonna keep quoting Che Guevara,
Originally posted by lucid eyes
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
So your gonna keep quoting Che Guevara,
I was looking for explanations of why left-wing protests always involve tear gas.
Originally posted by stephinrazin
Exactly. The right/left paradigm is way out of date. It is mental masturbation in my eyes. It boils down to wanting to be right, and prove someone else wrong. I am better than you, and I will use my political indoctrination to show yours is inferior. You can dress it up in the garments of argument, but at the end of the day most would rather prove the other person wrong rather than encourage them to think differently.
Originally posted by crimvelvet
Protest of course are absolutely useless
Originally posted by Cuervo
ou need to admit that, if real change through the people will ever occur, it will be by the people working together to change their oppressors.
Originally posted by redhorse
I think both sides are equally prone to either frankly.
Originally posted by works4dhs
Originally posted by Cuervo
This isn't a very good connection. You show me an out-of-control rioting liberal and I'll show you two right-winged bubba-effected gun-toting domestic terrorists.
what gun-toting right-wing terrorists? I am not aware of any conservative/right terrorist acts in the US in the last 50 years aside from T McVeigh. as the op opined, Tea Party functions were the epitome of civil actions. compare to the green riots in Seattle, etc.
re; Gov Palin; she was hounded out of office by a partisan AG who launched a series of unfounded investigations on her and her family, knowing she (as opposed to wealthy individuals like John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi) lacked the wealth to fight the courts and was thus forced out.
imho liberals substitute politics for religion, hence the emotional frenzy.