It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
OFFICIAL ACCOUNT OF 9/11 FLIGHT CONTRADICTED BY GOVERNMENT'S OWN DATA
1. The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not support official events.
2. All Altitude data shows the aircraft at least 300 feet too high to have struck the light poles.
3. The rate of descent data is in direct conflict with the aircraft being able to impact the light poles and be captured in the Dept of Defense "5 Frames" video of an object traveling nearly parallel with the Pentagon lawn.
4. The record of data stops at least one second prior to official impact time.
5. If data trends are continued, the aircraft altitude would have been at least 100 feet too high to have hit the Pentagon.
"In this lengthy and detailed discussion Dr Legge is careful to lay out clearly his way of thinking on the Pentagon issue and why it is so important to the 9/11 Truth Movement not to make unsupported claims about the events there.
Ronald McDonald Kidnapped – Ransom Demanded
:African Country First To Ban Public Flatulence?
Dr. Legge is basing his position upon evidence that you conspiracy people keep insisting doesn't exist.
Various claims have been made about the attack on the Pentagon. Early claims included damage by a missile or a truck bomb.3 However, as so many witnesses had reported seeing a large commercial aircraft approaching the Pentagon, these claims received little attention from the public.
Just because someone has a PhD in something, people automatically take their Theories as Fact. This is totally incorrect.
Originally posted by ANClENT
pentagon got hit by a missle end of story
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by Whereweheaded
i dont know what flew into the pentagon but there are some things i dont understand if it was a plane.
where are the titanium engines in those pictures
how come there are no marks on the ground from the planes approach.
how did a aluminum fusalage punch a hole through reinforced concrete
why is the entance hole so small
how comes there is no remains of the plane outside apart from a few bits of debris that could be lifte by hand
kx
Originally posted by vipertech0596
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by Whereweheaded
i dont know what flew into the pentagon but there are some things i dont understand if it was a plane.
where are the titanium engines in those pictures
how come there are no marks on the ground from the planes approach.
how did a aluminum fusalage punch a hole through reinforced concrete
why is the entance hole so small
how comes there is no remains of the plane outside apart from a few bits of debris that could be lifte by hand
kx
1. The engines arent made of Titanium.
2. There are no marks on the ground because the plane hit the building.
3. Have you not ever seen pictures that show pieces of straw sticking through trees after tornados hit?
4. The entrance "hole" is just over 14 feet....just a wee bit more than the diameter of the fuselage of a 757. In addition, the impact area streches 90+ feet on either side of that hole.
5. First you wonder how aluminum will go through a brick wall....then you are concerned that the pieces of wreckage outside the building arent bigger? Seriously????????
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by purplemer
Where do you get a "16 foot hole"??? Before you wish to "question" the events at the Pentagon, a good start would be to, first, have the facts correct......