It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So in other words, Dr. Legge is absolutely correct on everything you want to believe is true, and he's absolutely mistaken on the things you don't want to believe is true. Does that about sum it up?
Oh, there was plenty of debris
It is only the "conspiracy" mindset that thinks otherwise...."they" seem to believe that every single piece and fragment should have been photographed, and catalogued and posted on the Internet!!
Their "logic" is, since "they" can't see "all" of it, then it is a "lie"?? How does that compute?
Challenge: Show any...just one will do...example of another large airplane crash, where you can point to ALL the photographs, on the Internet, of each and every piece of debris.....ready, set , go!!!
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by topdog30
WHEN is it ever going to be "enough"??
edit on 7 February 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
Dave, you are making the exact mistake you have been making for the year I've been on ATS; and frankly, I don't believe it's a mistake. You are talking to one small group or "truthers" as if that group encompasses every person who has doubts in the OS. I am not sure why you do this, but it's quite disingenuous. There are a few nutbars who believe there was no plane, but the vast majority of "truthers" accept there was; they simply questions the OS.
On the contrary, I post this specifically to make the point I've been making from day one- the bulk of the research these conspiracy people claim to have done isn't from their own research, but rather from the information they're getting from one or another conspiracy web site, and the individual conspiracy claim they subscribe to depends on the specific conspiracy web site they went to for their information. It's the whole reason that not a single one of you conspiracy theorists can sit down and agree with any other conspiracy theorist, and let's face it, a sincere review of the facts is NOT going to prove the attack was staged by secret cults of Satan worshipping numerologists. Someone came up with that idea becuase they were already suckered by the idea of secret cults of Satan worshipping numerologists beforehand, so of course they're going to review web sites that claim the attack was staged by secret cults of Satan worshipping numerologists.
You can call them "nutbars"...but they are calling YOU a nutbar. How would I as a bystander know who was right?
Without the video evidence...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by muzzleflash
Without the video evidence...
I repeat:
Why are the SSFDR, eyewitnesses, ATC radar tracking data, debris, DNA....etc not "good enough"??
Many, many, many....(most, actually) airplane crashes occur, and there is no video record of any osrt, of the occurrence. Yet, they are not "questioned".
Why?? This is not any different, except inasmuch as being a criminally intent act.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by muzzleflash
Without the video evidence...
I repeat:
Why are the SSFDR, eyewitnesses, ATC radar tracking data, debris, DNA....etc not "good enough"??
Many, many, many....(most, actually) airplane crashes occur, and there is no video record of any osrt, of the occurrence. Yet, they are not "questioned".
Why?? This is not any different, except inasmuch as being a criminally intent act.
Absolutely no other cameras in D.C. caught the plane on film that day.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
It would still not shut up the "no-planers"!!!. As evidenced by the myriad and ridiculous "discussions" about NYC impacts.....truly, it is a self-delusion of some staggering proportions....