It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Trance Optic
I bet these skulls have some info in them being that they are quartz isnt light a factor with quartz, have they tried using light to try an see if there is a effect from it?
I mean these things prolly arent just door stopers.
Originally posted by Diplomat
Originally posted by Trance Optic
I bet these skulls have some info in them being that they are quartz isnt light a factor with quartz, have they tried using light to try an see if there is a effect from it?
I mean these things prolly arent just door stopers.
Are you not reading? People claim that there is an actual "being" inside of these Skulls, and that they communicate telepathically with people.
Of course the skulls have "info" in them, (if the people who say they communicate with them are telling the truth) they are ancient and have supposedly been collecting data all around them for years.
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by Diplomat
Originally posted by Trance Optic
I bet these skulls have some info in them being that they are quartz isnt light a factor with quartz, have they tried using light to try an see if there is a effect from it?
I mean these things prolly arent just door stopers.
Are you not reading? People claim that there is an actual "being" inside of these Skulls, and that they communicate telepathically with people.
Of course the skulls have "info" in them, (if the people who say they communicate with them are telling the truth) they are ancient and have supposedly been collecting data all around them for years.
Are you not reading?
None of these skulls datre to before the late 18th century - A.D.
Harte
Originally posted by Naboo the Enigma
reply to post by Diplomat
Some women talking to an ancient skull is hardly an excellent indicator of the skull's age is it? Why hasn't anyone asked the Pyramids or the Turin Shroud how old they are?
Only a few crystal skulls have been expertly authenticated as ancient. Many have been carved within the last five years. Presently, the accepted authentication by which a carved skull can be termed ancient is through a complicated process of casting a mold of the skull and placing it under an electron microscope to examine the minute markings left by the carver. These markings are the clues by which the age of the carving is determined. The telltale pattern of the marking will verify what method was used to carve and polish the skull; thereby, the antiquity expert is able to confirm the age based on methods used on other known works which range from the ancient to the very contemporary.
Originally posted by Marius Blackwood
The Texas Crystal Skull, Max, has been authenticated as ancient, as have one or two other I believe. I'm still looking for the primary source accounts of these examinations though.
Take it as you will.
There are many different physical phenomena that involve both sound and light. In photoacoustics, sounds are created by very short pulses of laser light impinging on materials. Through holographic interferometry and fiber optic sensors, light can be used to measure and visualize sound. Sound can also have an influence on light, for example when an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) is used to shift the frequency of light. However, perhaps the most interesting and most baffling interaction between sound and light is the phenomenon known as sonoluminescence.
Sonoluminescence is the process of converting sound into light. There are two types of sonoluminescence, Multiple Bubble Sonoluminesence (MBSL) and Single Bubble Sonoluminescence (SBSL). In order to perform sonoluminescence, a flask full of water or whatever medium is connected to two piezoelectric transducers (used to amplify sound). The amplifiers feed into the transducers which then start emitting a very concentrated amount of sound, usually around 20-35 Khz. At this point in time, bubbles begin to form, dubbed as "cavitation bubbles." Once a cavitation bubble is captured in the middle of the flask, it is under the effects of the amplified sound. At a certain resonance point, the bubble begins to emit flashes of white light.
Originally posted by tyranny22
There's only one way to prove or disprove the Mystery or Secrets of the 13 Crystal Skulls
In 1943, it was sold at Sotheby's in London to Frederick Arthur (Mike) Mitchell-Hedges, a well-to-do English deep-sea fisherman, explorer, and yarn-spinner extraordinaire.
Since the 1954 publication of Mitchell-Hedges's memoir, Danger My Ally, this third-generation, twentieth-century skull has acquired a Maya origin, as well as a number of fantastic, Indiana Jones-like tall tales.
I believe that all of the smaller crystal skulls that constitute the first generation of fakes were made in Mexico around the time they were sold, between 1856 and 1880. This 24-year period may represent the output of a single artisan, or perhaps a single workshop.
Although nearly all of the crystal skulls have at times been identified as Aztec, Toltec, Mixtec, or occasionally Maya, they do not reflect the artistic or stylistic characteristics of any of these cultures. The Aztec and Toltec versions of death heads were nearly always carved in basalt, occasionally were covered with stucco, and were probably all painted. They were usually either attached to walls or altars, or depicted in bas reliefs of deities as ornaments worn on belts. They are comparatively crudely carved, but are more naturalistic than the crystal skulls, particularly in the depiction of the teeth. The Mixtec occasionally fabricated skulls in gold, but these representations are more precisely described as skull-like faces with intact eyes, noses, and ears. The Maya also carved skulls, but in relief on limestone. Often these skulls, depicted in profile, represent days of their calendars.
... not a single crystal skull in a museum collection comes from a documented excavation ...
Originally posted by tyranny22
sour grapes anyone?
Originally posted by tyranny22
I guess people will believe what they will believe.
Funny that many of these artifacts sat around in some of the most prestigious museums in the world and in the hands of the industries experts for nearly 70 years before studies deemed them fake.
Originally posted by tyranny22
I guess people will believe what they will believe.
Funny that many of these artifacts sat around in some of the most prestigious museums in the world and in the hands of the industries experts for nearly 70 years before studies deemed them fake.
Originally posted by tyranny22The study that labeled some of these skulls as fakes was based on the fact that the crystal was of a Brazilian origin, which I don't think anyone here claims to know from where the crystal was derived, and that the indentions on the teeth were from a rotary tool.
And since we know that the Inca and Aztecs were incapable of spinning a carving utensil in a circular patter ... they must be fake. Because, after all ... we know that they were terrible at calculating days, months and years.
Originally posted by tyranny22I don't care to comment on the Mitchell-Hedges skull. It's origins were pretty much summed up when all access to scientific tests were denied by the owners.
Originally posted by tyranny22What I find fascinating is how people tend to leech onto an idea when it's presented as "official". Think: Iraq war and WMD. Who's jumping on whom's bandwagon?