It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Xcathdra
As far as an actual list gimme some time to look.
Great, I cant wait to see the list..
7 February 2011 Last updated at 14:01 ET Help There is a risk of "denial of justice" if Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is tried for rape in Sweden, his lawyer has told a UK extradition hearing.
Geoffrey Robertson QC said his client could face the death penalty if then sent to the US on separate charges relating to the whistleblowing website.
Prosecutors rejected suggestions the Swedish legal system did not have safeguards against such a "violation".
Mr Assange, 39, denies claims of sexual assault against two women.
Alan Little reports.
Also, apparently new info keeps coming out form the investigation, as the video shows, that part of the allegation is Assange did in fact hold one of the females down, resulting in forced coercian, which meets the criteria of rape.
Originally posted by backinblack
I'm sure you meant to say "alledged".....
Originally posted by backinblack
BTW, as wierd as it sounds, some girls like to be held down..
Originally posted by backinblack
Was this also the FIRST time they had sex??
Originally posted by backinblack
Also, did she scream??
Originally posted by backinblack
Did she report she was raped and how long after the fact?
Originally posted by backinblack
Lots of info left out it seems..
Are you being serious? Of course she filed a complaint, hence the reason for the big hoopla Assange is involved in. And yes one of the accusers went to the Hospital.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Xcathdra
Are you being serious? Of course she filed a complaint, hence the reason for the big hoopla Assange is involved in. And yes one of the accusers went to the Hospital.
When?
There's no allegation of being held hostage, so was it within hours, same day, next day, days/weeks later??
Seems to me if someone has been raped and NOT being held hostage, they would report it within hours..
Did that happen??
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Xcathdra
Are you being serious? Of course she filed a complaint, hence the reason for the big hoopla Assange is involved in. And yes one of the accusers went to the Hospital.
When?
There's no allegation of being held hostage, so was it within hours, same day, next day, days/weeks later??
Seems to me if someone has been raped and NOT being held hostage, they would report it within hours..
Did that happen??
Go back and read
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Xcathdra
Are you being serious? Of course she filed a complaint, hence the reason for the big hoopla Assange is involved in. And yes one of the accusers went to the Hospital.
When?
There's no allegation of being held hostage, so was it within hours, same day, next day, days/weeks later??
Seems to me if someone has been raped and NOT being held hostage, they would report it within hours..
Did that happen??
Go back and read
Nah, read enough..
I know the situation and have my opinions on why it's being played the way it is..
You have your opinions (or someone elses) and are not prepared to even consider the fact..
I've said all I need too...
Right.. go back and read
Originally posted by jonnywhite
I don't understand how he thought he could go out and rape someone and everything would be fine.
Originally posted by backinblack
Please read the facts before posting..
There is a right to appeal the decision to extradite. This appeal would be heard by the Administrative Court.
A notice of appeal must be lodged within seven days of the decision to extradite. The Administrative Court should hear the appeal within 40 days of the notice being lodged. However, in practice this can often take three to four months.
It is possible to appeal from the Administrative Court to the Supreme Court, but only if the Administrative Court certifies that the appeal involves a point of law of general public importance and either it, or the Supreme Court grants leave to appeal.
It is then possible to appeal against the decision of the Supreme Court to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg
Swedish prosecutors did not follow "proper procedure" while investigating rape claims against Julian Assange, a UK extradition hearing was told.
Sven-Erik Alhem, a witness, said it was "quite peculiar" that authorities did not get the Wikileaks founder's version of events before seeking his arrest.
Originally posted by Laurauk
Update from Assange's Extradition Hearing:
Swedish prosecutors did not follow "proper procedure" while investigating rape claims against Julian Assange, a UK extradition hearing was told.
Sven-Erik Alhem, a witness, said it was "quite peculiar" that authorities did not get the Wikileaks founder's version of events before seeking his arrest.
BBC NEWS