Another Chemtrail Question, page 3

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul

---

Much obliged for your input and appreciate the perspective.

reply to post by RicoMarston

---

Why then do some contrails evaporate right behind the plane as it crosses the sky, never to be seen again, while others hang and stretch and billow and blow in the wind and leave lasting visible effects for the rest of the day?

You mentioned cars...that is part of the answer. The condensation that the car's exhaust makes isn't nearly as great in quantity, for one thing. Second, unless you are at one of the poles, it just isn't COLD enough for the condensation in car's exhaust to freeze into ice crystals, as contrails do, from jet engine exhaust.

When a contrail evaporates (sublimates, technically) fairly quickly after passage, it's because the Relative Humidity at that altitude, and location, isn't sufficient to sustain the contrail, after it forms. Think of it as right on the edge of "no contrails" and "persistent contrails". Temperature plays a role, too.

The thing about "lasting effects" is....once formed, and WHEN conditions are ripe for other clouds (cirrus, at those altitudes) to ALSO form....that is what happens. Clouds. Clouds form for many, many perfectly natural reasons....you don't deny that clouds can hang around for many hours, and cover the sky, do you??

Contrails behave no differently than clouds, in that situation. Clouds, also, will sometimes evaporate (sublimate) too, right??

Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by lambros56

---

.... It appears to be an attempt to desensitize the true believers. If you've got more examples like that, please lay them on me.

Wait....if life in the media, and life outside.... are equal, what is there to desensetize ?
In other words, if you see contrails outside, then see them on TV.....how is that strange ?

It would only be strange if you did not see them outside, but then saw them on TV.
...or vice-versa.

I think this is the making of an issue, where there is no issue to be had.

Just for grits and shiggles, I googled "ansel adams contrails". Because he's a reknowned photographer, with many examples of skies in his works. Though, might have thought contrails spoiled his pictures of nature....Got some, many aren't his work. This one is labeled from 1954, though:

The question of atmospheric effects is valid. The observation of differences in contrail behavior, coupled with public statements indicating the military's desire to control the weather are what makes people suspect a covert program for weather manipulation. It is a valid suspicion.

It should be noted that if there is a covert weather modification plan it would be sensible to have "persistent contrails" be the cover story, resulting in distracting arguments such as we're involved in now.

I noticed a big difference in contrail behavior from about 2007 until the GoM explosion (massive grid patterns and parallel lines causing a sun-blocking haze). After the GoM, it all changed back to normal. The atmospheric conditions hadn't changed from one day to the next, but the behavior of contrails sure did.

I have yet to see any photos or video from the 20th century that show contrails spreading out to create a haze, yet they are plentiful in the 21st century. Thanks to the folks who have posted photos from the last century, but those are photos of persistent contrails and they don't look the same as the systematic spraying I have witnessed.

Unfortunately I cannot provide photographic evidence which shows the difference I described in my sky, and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything...this post was for my benefit, but I'm still not satisfied.

The change in my area was DRAMATIC. Huge patterns of grids, covering the sky in all directions, and after a couple years like that, it all stopped. Atmospheric conditions can explain occasional persistent contrails, but they don't explain how they would change so dramatically from one day to the next. The reason I noticed them to begin with was because they blocked the sun on sunny days. If the grids and lines are normal, I should be able to count on seeing them at about the same time each year. For a couple years in a row I noticed the sun being blocked on most sunny days...this is what caught my attention to begin with, and this is what caught my attention when they STOPPED; the sunny days are back and persistent contrails are only visible occasionally again.

Here's an article describing it over Cyprus:

“We challenge the authorities to prove us wrong. The president of the chemists in Greece recently suggested to the Cyprus parliament that the easiest and most effective way to test for chemtrails would be to send a plane up in the skies above Cyprus, with air filters, which could collect samples of air. These could then be analysed.” He said it would only cost around ten thousand euros. “This would solve the mystery,” he added.

www.cyprus-mail.com...

Why would anyone in the chemtrail camp believe the Govt if it did such sampling?

why don'' they do it, and prove themselves right??

It is quite irritating really!

for a video of 20th century contrails spreading out over the entire sky look up some of the WW2 ones of B-17's - here's one in youtube from the film on het Memphis Belle - the whole original film is referenced.

Here's a page devoted to giving examples of persistant and spreading contrails - with newspaper clippings about them back to 1944 and a first hand account from 1940

this page includes a couple of phots and videos from WW2 that clearly show contrails expanding.

Hope that helps.

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul

---

You're right, I would expect a transparent investigation by a governing body that was genuinely interested in the welfare of its people.

None of the videos I've seen can explain the grid patterns I've seen blocking the sun, day after day, week after week, month after month. Nor do they explain how those sun-blocking hazes are no longer here. If grids and lines are so common as to block most of the summer sun for a couple of years straight, they should have also been there this last summer.

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul

---

I assume the atmospheric conditions to be chaotic. Since this summer, the conditions have been as I recall them being prior to the summer of 2007, which was when the grids and patterns were so dramatically blocking the sun. This went on daily, at least on the days I could see the sky (it is Oregon, after all)...the haze could be counted on whether it was a sunny day in April, or a hot day in August. Then one day the grids stopped, and so did the haze...and now we're back to the familiar old, run of the mill, occasional perpetual contrail, as one would expect to see in a chaotic system.

reply to post by Yankee451

---

WAIT a gol-gosh darned minute!! (Using my best James Stewart voice, from any of his many movies....)...

You live in OREGON, and are trying to equate any of your (mistaken perceptions) to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill????

Oh, sheesh!

What a waste of time, sorry.....(and utterly illogical....).

reply to post by weedwhacker

---

What have you convinced yourself of now, Weedwacker?

It seems quite logical to suspect a correlation when one notices a large spraying operation in the GoM coinciding with an observed dramatic drop in local air traffic accompanied by long-lost clear skies, although I'm guessing you'd prefer I just take your word for it and spend my time examining my navel.

Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul

---

I assume the atmospheric conditions to be chaotic.

conditions change - if there are only occasional contrails now then that's because of the conditions now. If there were persistant contrails "then" then it is because the conditions were right for them "then".

There are essentially an infinite number of reasons why it would be different "now" then "then", so I dont' actualy know what your point is.

your observations are anecdotal - I don't see you saying that you have done a survey of contrail "numbers" or kept tabs on atmospheric conditions, so I cannot see that you have anything to base any suspicions on except what we always hear - unsupported assertions and speculation.

And that's both boring and unconvincing.

At least science has evidence you can check - and if you choose to be unconvinced by it then that is you choosing to ignore verifiable evidence.

reply to post by Yankee451

---

I am going to have to open this one up, to let some one else field it....how many new ways can I write how utterly illogical it is???

Someone in Oregon, with nothing other than a very limited memory of what is "remembered"....suddenly makes this crap up in his/her mind, citing a false analogy with an event thousnads of miles away???\

This is the epitome of fallacious reasoning....it's what once held science back for centuries, and still does, even to this day...obviously....

reply to post by weedwhacker

---

Then please don't debase yourself by hanging around.

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul

---

"He" knows by virtue of the details included in "his" original post.

"He" couldn't care less if you don't accept "his" explanation of how "he knows".

Thanks for your photos and input, but you can keep your condescension.

Lifting Secrecy on Information About Extraterrestrial Intelligence. The Clintons and Rockefellers.
  Posted 14 days ago with 111 member flags

Did NASA "bomb" the moon to hide something?
  Posted 3 days ago with 76 member flags

New Plasma Battery Technology Probably Powering Stealth Sattelites
  Posted 16 days ago with 17 member flags

Nick Pope Interview on ATSLive, Got a Question to ask?
  Posted 19 days ago with 13 member flags

May 13th, 2012: One Week \'Till May 20th, 2012 - 222 Days \'Till December 21st
  Posted 16 days ago with 13 member flags

Will Planet X be visible during the eclipse on May 20th?
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags

Obama and the Card Game Illuminati
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags

“1980’s Cassette tape playing computer loading sounds/images” codes for 2012
  Posted 19 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: