A few months ago I made a thread called The WORDS conspiracy... I advanced an idea much similar to yours.
I think TPTB did mislead us on the words true meanings. When you look at it, words have 2, 3 even 4 different meanings, so we tend to think it is ok,
but when you look at some words, you can see a "pattern of disdain" towards us.
Let's take one. If I say I'm a pedophile, everybody will jump to the roof. But when you know the real meaning of the word, that is friends of
it is not shocking a bit. But I can't say I'm friendly with children, it looks bad. But what about someone that is dangerous towards
children? How do you designate him/her? Pedomane? THAT is the word that should be used. But when using "pedophile", it is hard for any Justice
System to send someone for a long time behind bars for being "friendly" to children. Strangely enough, that is what we observe in society today,
the early release, and then hiring, of pedophiles in children related jobs... Makes you wonder... Made me, at least.
Think about it, if pedophile is a negative word, then philharmonic should, too. And philatelist too. And philanthropic... Or philosopher, etc.
They're all philo
to something. It should be bad, why is it not? I thought that laws was about precision of words, not perversion of them.
TPTB teach us the words we use, and they control the circumstances in which the words will be used. And some of these are pretty strange. Take the
. Who doesn't want to be happy? I don't. I never will again want to be happy, because, like everybody, I once did. The word happy
( and it is the exact same thing with the french equivalent ) is socially taken as meaning "be joyous", but in truth, the word means "be lucky".
And luck is said to be a fruit of the Devil. So it is a bad thing, no? Surely, to wish luck, is to wish the Devil to someone we love. That should
be damnable! ( Wish isn't a good word either, but I'll concentrate on happy. ) So why would TPTB teach us to cross damn ourselves? There must be
The words we use have been built by those who deceive us constantly. Perhaps the simple use of words numbs us without our knowing. Or rather,
without our acknowledging it. In any ways, however the process works, we wish ourselves to be happy, we strive for happiness, and TPTB gladly gives
us what we want in that regards. You can drink, drug yourself, do sports on a regular basis, go to the cinema, buy things, eat things, in brief,
whatever gets you thru the night.
And while we are trying with all our might to be happy, we can hear or read that people at the top have destinies! Hey! I saw it in a movie about
Pierre Jean Jacques
! He really had a destiny!... Mmmbut the word destiny means project
... So the Devil lies here, right there.
While we are trying to be happy (to be lucky ( hoping everything will fall into place for us, like, magically! )), TPTB are busy having destinies
Sometimes, it is so much in our face that we can't see it at all for what it is. Take the DEA, the Drug Enforcement Agency. They spend a lot of
money to stop drug dealers, but the key word here is enforcement.
To enforce is to apply... Hmm... Well, drugs made overseas HAVE to cross the borders and be applied to drug addicts, no? Or if you prefer, it can mean
compulsion. The Drug Compulsion Agency... Still, I can't see where they say their mandate is to stop the drug from reaching the streets. Ok, I know
they "officially" say they exist for that reason, but what is the meaning of "to apply" or "compulsion", then? Where does it mean "to stop"
in these synonyms? Because Drug Agency doesn't mean "to stop" the drugs either...
Words are images expressed differently. I think conspiracy should read as joined breath, meaning they are like one, thus not part of the others. Not
being part of the others gives you the image of something you can't touch. Spouse in french is said conjoint
, meaning "joined" by the
"vagina", because... the word CON- is a french word that means vagina. And from that old word, in french you have vache ( cow ) and bourse, sacoche
( purse ). It became C.U.N.T in english, but when it is used as con- it means, like in french, "to join", or, a "place to be filled". The image
is all there, either as a 'joining" ( of whatever follows ), or a hole into which you can put things... Like compulsion is not a joined urge, but
an urge that needs to be filled... or a construction is a joined structure.
The list is long and at one point, you can't help but think that it is informed, articulate and intelligent individuals that "codified" the
languages. And since it has been codified by people that claim to be above you, you can definitely say there is a conspiracy going on... The real
question becomes: is it for my good at all? And before you answer, remember that the people that codify the languages are "knighted" for their
work... That's their lowest rank...
Ah, it's late here and I "hope" I'm making sense,