Spray on skin gun heals wounds in days, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 34 times


reply posted on 5-2-2011 @ 03:41 PM by VneZonyDostupa
reply to post by SquirrelNutz


That's not his hand. If you listen to the narrator, he says very clearly that it is an example of a second degree burn.



reply posted on 5-2-2011 @ 04:34 PM by SquirrelNutz
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
reply to post by SquirrelNutz


That's not his hand. If you listen to the narrator, he says very clearly that it is an example of a second degree burn.


Okay. Even worse. We have no benchmark for measuring the success of this procedure, 'cause they haven't provided enough data points. If this is as remarkable as they are purporting, then show the evidence in definitive, quantifiable terms (consensus on visual observation), not this whole bait-n-switch nonsense.

To clarify: the simplist and most authentic method for corroborating the claims of this procedure, show me a test subject pre injury (if possible), post injury, post procedure - pretty easy.

Very interesting and beneficial technology, if legit. Not 'earth-shattering' status, yet.


edit on 2/5/2011 by SquirrelNutz because: Spelling



reply posted on 5-2-2011 @ 05:06 PM by VneZonyDostupa
reply to post by SquirrelNutz


Squirrel, keep in mind that the video was a pop-science piece for the Discovery channel, not a proof-of-concept video/paper for the medical community.

Do you honestly think anyone would watch the show if it provided statistical analysis, data from animal trials, covariate exclusions, and so on?

Stop being so pessimistic and do the research yourself, rather than poo-pooing a neat video about an experimental technology.
edit on 2/5/2011 by VneZonyDostupa because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-2-2011 @ 06:05 PM by scojak
reply to post by WeRpeons


I hope this doesn't hijack the thread, but there actually already is an easy cure for cancer...and HIV, and it's ben around for quite some time. "Unfortunately" it's a very cheap process, so interest has been minimal from the capitalists. Pretty f'ed up if you ask me. Check this thread and links for more info.

www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.thenhf.com...
www.thenhf.com...

On another note, that skin gun is friggin amazing!...which means it also will probably not get much attention...sigh


reply posted on 6-2-2011 @ 12:52 AM by Xcathdra
Originally posted by scojak
reply to post by WeRpeons


I hope this doesn't hijack the thread, but there actually already is an easy cure for cancer...and HIV, and it's ben around for quite some time. "Unfortunately" it's a very cheap process, so interest has been minimal from the capitalists. Pretty f'ed up if you ask me. Check this thread and links for more info.

www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.thenhf.com...
www.thenhf.com...

On another note, that skin gun is friggin amazing!...which means it also will probably not get much attention...sigh


Nice threads... Hijack away. The more we can spread the info the better in my book. I equate medical advancement and history in the same boat. We have people in both professions who are so set in their ways that anything new that comes about that challenges the status quo is dismissed or written of as quackery.

I am curious what else this discovery can do. I know other people have posted links to others articles talking about the burn stuff. Regenerative medicine is quickly taking over in the medical field and with results like the skin gun I think the sickbays of Startrek are not to far off.

I saw a program where a college class was given an assignment to develop something that can be used in countries that lack modern infrastructure (consistent power, refridgeration etc). These 2 girls were playing around with the plastic salad spinner thing and modified it to seperate blood. Its hand powered so it can be used in the field. I thought it was pretty cool the way it came about and the effects its going ot have.

Here is another video on cell regeneration dealing with issues other than burns.

www.noob.us...

edit on 6-2-2011 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 6-2-2011 @ 01:00 AM by Xcathdra
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
reply to post by SquirrelNutz


Squirrel, keep in mind that the video was a pop-science piece for the Discovery channel, not a proof-of-concept video/paper for the medical community.

Do you honestly think anyone would watch the show if it provided statistical analysis, data from animal trials, covariate exclusions, and so on?

Stop being so pessimistic and do the research yourself, rather than poo-pooing a neat video about an experimental technology.
edit on 2/5/2011 by VneZonyDostupa because: (no reason given)


The entire segment will air this monday February 7th. I would assume that, as mentioned above here, they will go into more detail with photos and what not. I know there is a lot of snake oil salesmen out there, but I have never seen National Geographics be a shill for them.

I think in the long run we should be optomistic about stuff like this. With everthing thats been going on in the world, its nice to have something positive we can all look forward to.

If anything, to me at least, its a small glimmer of hope that the human drive for exploration and continual improvement is still around.

National Geographics
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Cooking With Aluminum Foil Should Be Avoided
  Posted 16 days ago with 43 member flags
"US teen invents advanced cancer test using Google"
  Posted 17 days ago with 38 member flags
A virus that kills cancer: the cure that\'s waiting in the cold
  Posted 6 days ago with 21 member flags
Stem cells bring back feeling for paralysed patients
  Posted 7 days ago with 7 member flags
Gruenenthal\'s thalidomide apology \'insulting\'
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags