Alien Origins of our DNA and the Creation of Man (a must read!!!)

page: 1
148
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+86 more 
posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 10:01 PM
link   
Alien Origins of our DNA and the Creation of Man:



I have came across a couple articles and information during my research lately,I thought I would share some of and their contents with the rest of you here at ATS and get your thoughts & opinions relating to this aspect of the UFO/alien phenomenon,DNA & Humanities origins.

I do not think it is that much of a stretch to theorize and believe that some type of 'Intelligence' was behind the creation of DNA and our very own existence IMO.

Once you allow your consciousness to expand,do as much research on these subjects as possible and begin letting in these possibilities,if you have studied the traits of DNA,our origins and existence.
I think you come to this conclusion: What we think we know and what we have been taught, apparently is incomplete and quite possibly, Wrong.


What follows are just a few examples of content,sites and information I have read and came across recently and in the past in my search for a deeper understanding of our origins,aliens and DNA :



"God" is responsible for the spiritual entities within our bodies, and more likely, aliens are the most likely candidates for the geniuses behind the amazing nanotech DNA which designs our life form physical bodies; there is no argument required.

There are many predominant planets whose entire intelligent life forms are spiritual entities who have no physical DNA required to house such a spirit being. Our physical world is an anomaly, by virtue of the sheer numbers of many such non-corporeal worlds, by comparison.

Does human DNA reflect a computer code, an alien nanotech, and thus the not so hidden hidden fingerprint of a "Creator"?

Scientists have found that our genetic code has all of these key elements.
"The coding regions of DNA," expostulates Dr. Stephen Meyer, "have exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language" (quoted by Strobel, p. 237, The Case for a Creator, 2004)

Whose mind or what entity could shrink and miniaturize such information and place our DNA's enormous number of 'letters' in their correct sequence as a genetic building block instruction manual?
Could evolution in itself have progressively come up with a nanotech system like this?

Source

Could some type of Extraterrestrial or Inter-dimensional 'Intelligence' be responsible for the minute,amazing Intricacies within the creation of our very DNA?




I personally believe this to be the case,whether you theorize that from the very beginning we were ultimately an experiment or some form of 'Creation' project or the possibility that along our primitive path of "evolution" back in antiquity we were genetically tampered and altered over time to our present form.

I think these theories are just as credible,believable and they deserve further study & inquiry from the scientific community. ( Humanity needs to think outside their comfortable "bubble" as a whole ) if not even more so,than comparative beliefs & theories.

Additional articles & links relating to Alien/DNA interactions and Origins:


Exo-scientists suggest that subsequent interventions on Earth by other extraterrestrials, largely sought to manipulate Earth humans genetically, technologically, and also by dysfunctionally inspiring religious dogma, and accompanying rituals. Apparently, these extraterrestrials performed 'great feats' in order to be worshipped as 'gods'.

The reported next step was to provide technology to these Earth humans so that these humans could create impressive looking "rich" structures of religious worship, laid with gold and other mined mineral resources, of religious worship to these extraterrestrial 'gods'.

This corrupting of human spirituality, would further dysfunctionally inspire crass materialism. This apparent influence is shown in structures which include the Great Pyramids, Temples, and into other religious structures which include Churches.

Link


While researching cultures (i.e..-Sumerian,Hopi,Inca,Mayan,Egypt,Native Americans,Aborigines among other cultures & indigenous peoples) it becomes irrefutably evident of some kind of human/"alien" interaction that has been ignored,hidden and suppressed by mainstream anthropology,archeology,educators and the msm in general from the populace!
Sumerian figurine looking strikingly similar to a "alien" Grey


Here are just a two examples of Hopi Indian petroglyphs depicting "star beings" : The Snake & Ant people-




Petroglyphs-Pictographs-Cave Paintings-Geoglyphs



hardly any uniqueness to the human genes.?
They are comparative to not the presumed 95 percent but to almost 99 percent of the chimpanzees, and 70 percent of the mouse. Human genes, with the same functions, were found to be identical to genes of other vertebrates, as well as invertebrates, plants, fungi, even yeast.

The findings not only confirmed that there was one source of DNA for all life on Earth, but also enabled the scientists to trace the evolutionary process how more complex organisms evolved, genetically, from simpler ones, adopting at each stage the genes of a lower life form to create a more complex higher life form culminating with Homo sapiens.

The Head-scratching Discovery - It was here, in tracing the vertical evolutionary record contained in the human and the other analyzed genomes, that the scientists ran into an enigma. The head-scratching discovery by the public consortium, as Science termed it, was that the human genome contains 223 genes that do not have the required predecessors on the genomic evolutionary tree.

How did Humankind acquire such a bunch of enigmatic genes? In the evolutionary progression from bacteria to invertebrates (such as the lineages of yeast, worms, flies or mustard weed which have been deciphered) to vertebrates (mice, chimpanzees) and finally modern humans, these 223 genes are completely missing in the invertebrate phase. Therefore, the scientists can explain their presence in the human genome by a rather recent (in evolutionary time scales) probable horizontal transfer from bacteria.

In other words- At a relatively recent time as Evolution goes, modern humans acquired an extra 223 genes not through gradual evolution, not vertically on the Tree of Life, but horizontally, as a sideways insertion of genetic material from bacterial

An Immense Difference- Now, at first glance it would seem that 223 genes is no big deal. In fact, while every single gene makes a great difference to every individual, 223 genes make an immense difference to a species such as ours. The human genome is made up of about three billion neucleotides (the letters A-C-G-T which stand for the initials of the four nucleic acids that spell out all life on Earth); of them, just a little more than one percent are grouped into functioning genes (each gene consists of thousands of "letters").

The difference between one individual person and another amounts to about one-letter in a thousand in the DNA-alphabet. The difference between Humankind and Chimpanzee is less than one percent as genes go; and one percent of 30,000 genes is 300.

So, 223 genes is more than two thirds of the difference between me, you and a chimpanzee! An analysis of the functions of these genes through the proteins that they spell out, conducted by the Public Consortium team and published in the journal Nature, shows that they include not only proteins involved in important physiological but also psychiatric functions. Moreover, they are responsible for important neurological enzymes that stem only from the mitochondrial portion of the DNA the so-called "Eve DNA" that humankind inherited only through the mother-line, all the way back to a single Eve. That finding alone raises doubt regarding that the "bacterial insertion" explanation.

A Matter of Extreme Significance - Unless further scientific research can establish, beyond any doubt, that the only possible source of the extra genes are indeed bacteria, and unless it is then also determined that the infection (horizontal transfer) went from bacteria to Man and not from Man to bacteria, the only other available solution will be that offered by the Sumerian texts millennia ago. Until then, the enigmatic 223 alien genes will remain as an alternative and as a corroboration by modern science of extraterrestrial civilizations, and their apparent genetic participation in the Human Genome.

Extraterrestrial Genes and Human DNA

Junk DNA? I don't think so! I believe the 223 genes within our DNA are there for a reason.Not 'horizontal transfer from bacteria'.No accident. Explainable through genetic manipulations and/or creation by an unknown intelligence external to evolution.




Francis Crick and James Watson's discovery of DNA is quite interesting,especially when you learn that Crick,admitted by himself,frequently was under the influence of small amounts of '___' during his study and search of DNA! Is it possible that while Crick was in this altered state of consciousness he was given a glimpse into another dimension( astral/etheric/spirit realm),under normal conditions would be completely invisible to the naked eye? maybe.


Francis Crick, the Nobel Prize-winning father of modern genetics, was under the influence of '___' when he first deduced the double-helix structure of DNA nearly 50 years ago.

The abrasive and unorthodox Crick and his brilliant American co-researcher James Watson famously celebrated their eureka moment in March 1953 by running from the now legendary Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge to the nearby Eagle pub, where they announced over pints of bitter that they had discovered the secret of life.

Crick, who died ten days ago, aged 88, later told a fellow scientist that he often used small doses of '___' then an experimental drug used in psychotherapy to boost his powers of thought. He said it was '___', not the Eagle's warm beer, that helped him to unravel the structure of DNA, the discovery that won him the Nobel Prize.

Francis Crick,DNA and '___'

Expanded Idea of Panspermia Hypothesis by Francis Crick and Orgel:

'Directed Panspermia' suggests that life may be distributed by an advanced extraterrestrial civilization. Crick and Orgel argued that DNA encapsulated within small grains could be fired in all directions by such a civilization in order to spread life within the universe.

Their abstract in the 1973 Icarus paper reads: "It now seems unlikely that extraterrestrial living organisms could have reached the earth either as spores driven by the radiation pressure from another star or as living organisms imbedded in a meteorite. As an alternative to these nineteenth-century mechanisms, we have considered Directed Panspermia, the theory that organisms were deliberately transmitted to the earth by intelligent beings on another planet.

We conclude that it is possible that life reached the earth in this way, but that the scientific evidence is inadequate at the present time to say anything about the probability. We draw attention to the kinds of evidence that might throw additional light on the topic."

Francis Crick Remembered

Could panspermia be the culprit of our origins with the seeding of our planet eons ago?
directed by an "alien" intelligence or indirectly through some other unknown means?
It is still a possibility that we should not prematurely discard in our reasoning,contemplating and theorizing in relation to our beginnings.


[Crick & Watson Discovery & Diagram of DNA Double Helix]



Are you aware of the pioneers that originally paved the way and came before the discovery of the double helix that Crick & Watson discovered? If not follow the link I provide to investigate further :

Many people believe that American biologist James Watson and English physicist Francis Crick discovered DNA in the 1950s. In reality, this is not the case. Rather, DNA was first identified in the late 1860s by Swiss chemist Friedrich Miescher.

Then, in the decades following Miescher's discovery, other scientists--notably, Phoebus Levene and Erwin Chargaff--carried out a series of research efforts that revealed additional details about the DNA molecule, including its primary chemical components and the ways in which they joined with one another.

Without the scientific foundation provided by these pioneers, Watson and Crick may never have reached their groundbreaking conclusion of 1953: that the DNA molecule exists in the form of a three-dimensional double helix.


So my fellow aters,researchers and to everyone out there who has an interest & desire to know for certain,how we came into being and where we came from,where we are headed as a species and exactly what it means to be "Human" ? What is your take on DNA,humanity's origin,aliens and the implications this would hold for our species if proven to be true?



I thank you for taking the time to read my thread,soak in this information and to anyone who adds their input,ideas and theories I appreciate it and thank you in advance.

So...What are your guys/gals ideas & theories pertaining to this subject?
Look forward to reading your replies!


If you would like to take a look at one of my previous threads relating to what I personally believe could be the case of a number of experiences involving Alien abductions,sightings/reports and the possible origins of these beings, please go here:Explorations into the Ultraterrestrial Hypothesis:A Journey into Extradimensional Realities & Otherworldly Beings
edit on 4-2-2011 by PerfectPerception because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 10:17 PM
link   
reply to post by PerfectPerception
 


Wonderful work!

You have a lot of good evidence and unbiased text.

Interestingly enough, this screams Sitchin.

I believe in Alien Creation.



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 10:21 PM
link   
I've only got one thing to add.... Peter Khoury

www.cufos.org...

For those not familiar with the story, in short he had an encounter with two female aliens where their DNA was obtained and the analysis was startling! (Don't want to ruin the ending for you
)



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 10:27 PM
link   
Thanks!

The petroglyphs are something i find interesting.

Especially where there would be accurate, anatomically correct depictions of the animal wildlife,
and then they draw these bizarre 'human' figures.
Why not draw a clear picture of the humans as well??



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 10:42 PM
link   
I started reading this and started researching as soon as I read the section about mitochondrial Eve. Although there are more than one "Eve" they say that the oldest one was found in South Africa and is roughly 200,000 years old. Is it a coincidence that they found a very advanced ruins of a civilization in S.A that dates back to 200,000 year old (I believe this "city" was discovered in 2009. Strangely, when viewing the city from above (via Google Earth) many of the buildings form a spiral design and they are apparently not discernible from ground level but only from the sky. Could this have been the first city built by our ancient alien ancestors?

200,000 Year Old Metropolis in S.A

Also, the statue of an angel that was found on the moon was said to be dated at roughly 200,000 years old...
edit on 4/2/2011 by TheSparrowSings because: (no reason given)


200, 000 Year old Statue found on the Moon
edit on 4/2/2011 by TheSparrowSings because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 10:43 PM
link   
Just had a WOW moment!

In your first link, I spotted this:

Abductions and their remnant elusive memories have opened all this for Paul, a confirmed atheist, until he saw aliens float him out of his body, in his bed, at night.


A few weeks ago, after ages meditating in the hopes of an OBE, I had a 10 second moment when i actually was above, looking down on myself lying in bed.
Then, I saw 2 black smoke like things near the top of my bed, and 2 'greys' on the right side!
That's why it was only about 10 seconds or so, I freaked when I saw them.

I have mentioned this in another OBE thread, asking if this was seen by the more expert ATS people.



S&F. you made my day



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 10:46 PM
link   
Anasazi, but I don't see snake or ant people. The word Anasazi meant 'ancient ones' or enemy ancestors or ancestors that are not our own. I have always been interested in the Anasazi.



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 11:44 PM
link   
I would state it the other way around. Sure our DNA code resembles artificial code but that is only because both are logical, concise and elegant. I think that it is we who have used our inherent design abilities when designing computers. In this sense we have created too. And we shall do more as soon as we discover that militarism is empty and useless as either a means for or a path to freedom.



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 11:47 PM
link   
But who, then, if this be true, created the aliens who created us? It's a slippery slope I tell ya!



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 11:49 PM
link   
Excellent thread, well done.

Even if I don't agree with the final conclusion of ET's being our physical creators, you've certainly done your homework.

I'll have to give this thread a really good look once I have the time to do some additional research surrounding what you've presented, in the meantime S&F for you.

~Keeper
edit on 2/4/2011 by tothetenthpower because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 11:50 PM
link   
I always though that our missing DNA link was Alien

We were made in the image of the Creator after all
edit on 2/4/2011 by Ben81 because: S&F



posted on Feb, 4 2011 @ 11:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by The GUT
But who, then, if this be true, created the aliens who created us? It's a slippery slope I tell ya!


We will find out when the God's tell us.

Does anyone else believe in the Anunnaki as the Creators?

Nibiru and Tiamat?



posted on Feb, 5 2011 @ 12:20 AM
link   
What if it was not so much a "creation" as a genetic manipulation. Primitive man evolved naturally to a certain stage before being altered by alien species. After all, the myths of the past tell us that "gods" (or angels,elohim, whatever you want to call them from whatever myth you are reading) mixed with earth women. The Sumerians story seems to lean towards a dna mix.

So, in this case, no one had to have created our "creators". They could have evolved naturally, learned interstellar travel (and genetic manipulation, which as we know is already being done by scientists all over the current world) and come here, boosted humanity, gave us some basic tools to work with, gone home... and then be sorely mistaken by the humans that they left behind as something to be worshiped. ( I would assume that early man really enjoyed the company of these bringers of "life" and where sad to see them go.)



posted on Feb, 5 2011 @ 12:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ben81
I always though that our missing DNA link was Alien

We were made in the image of the Creator after all
edit on 2/4/2011 by Ben81 because: S&F


actually, if you got a bible near please grab it and open it up to genesis. it cleary states we were made in "thier" image. PLURAL!!! the key words used are "our image",


and damn, since my cold, I've been reading this site toooooo much perhaps!

s&f op!



posted on Feb, 5 2011 @ 01:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheSparrowSings
Also, the statue of an angel that was found on the moon was said to be dated at roughly 200,000 years old...



Written by TheCrit · Filed Under Silly


thecrit.com...




posted on Feb, 5 2011 @ 03:36 AM
link   
reply to post by PerfectPerception
 
Great OP and a change from the 'OMFG! It's a light!' videos we always get.You've thought about it and brought some supporting evidence at a time when links seem to be going out of fashion.

I disagree with your speculations for several reasons. Firstly, there are a few assumptions in there that are unsupported by evidence. Secondly, there's a strong use of the 'god in the gaps' argument. Thirdly, the images and artefacts tell us how *you* see the world and not how the people who designed them saw it.

You open with an extract from an article that is full of garbage in the sense of proclaiming facts that are merely the opinion of the blogger...example...


God is responsible for the spiritual entities within our bodies, and more likely, aliens are the most likely candidates for the geniuses behind the amazing nanotech DNA which designs our life form physical bodies; there is no argument required.

There are many predominant planets whose entire intelligent life forms are spiritual entities who have no physical DNA required to house such a spirit being.


God and aliens did everything because he says so?

The second article linked is similar to the first; the writer is making stuff up at a fast pace and with no regard to evidence beyond name-checking Watson and Crick. Just because they were the main discoverers of the DNA helix doesn't therefore suggest that wide cultures of aliens have been visiting and squabbling for millennia. You should beware of any 'exo-science' or 'exopolitics.' The people behind these two subjects spend their time in La-La Land. Two of them (Salla and Webre) are currently in a public row about the existence, essentially, of plesiosaurs on Mars. Yes, that's right...freaking sea dinosaurs on Mars and they aren't even joking.

Notwithstanding the abject idiocy of these guys, you raise the question of aliens creating our DNA? Well, it's impossible to *disprove* the idea. On the other hand, the idea that we evolved on this planet and share our DNA with every other life-form is more probable and demonstrable. We have sentience and so do crows, elephants, chimpanzees etc. We can test it. Without evidence of aliens visiting, it's just science-fiction and 'Wow, what ifs?!'

The cave art and petroglyhps are regularly pointed to as proof or evidence of aliens. People see what they want to see. Out of tens of thousands of examples spread across five continents, the 'evidence' has been cherry-picked to support the 'aliens did it' hypothesis. Not knowing exactly what some of them represented in the eyes of our ancestors leaves that gap all over again and people start seeing aliens. No doubt, there are also people who see them as demons.

Panspermia, or whatever new name it's currently going by, is a genuinely interesting concept. It's worth considering and, like the 'aliens did it' notion, impossible to disprove. At the same time, it can overlook the more probable explanation that life evolved here on Earth. If it could evolve elsewhere, it could evolve here too. If aliens came to create us, they had to evolve somewhere, therefore we could too. This is where we can look at the 'gaps,' but accept that the most probable, reasonable explanation is that we've evolved without aliens or ET seeding.

S&F



posted on Feb, 5 2011 @ 03:58 AM
link   
reply to post by PerfectPerception
 


You are gonna love a thread I created called Junk DNA

Same topic, different perspective.

Enjoy !


Good thread S & F



posted on Feb, 5 2011 @ 04:34 AM
link   
reply to post by PerfectPerception
 


Thank you for posting one of the most thought provoking subjects I have ever read on ATS.



posted on Feb, 5 2011 @ 05:50 AM
link   
I appreciate all the input and replies so far related to the Op.
I re-read it and noticed a error on my part or some how the code disappeared.
for the following quote here is the missing link for anyone interested


Link

Many people believe that American biologist James Watson and English physicist Francis Crick discovered DNA in the 1950s. In reality, this is not the case. Rather, DNA was first identified in the late 1860s by Swiss chemist Friedrich Miescher. Then, in the decades following Miescher's discovery, other scientists--notably, Phoebus Levene and Erwin Chargaff--carried out a series of research efforts that revealed additional details about the DNA molecule, including its primary chemical components and the ways in which they joined with one another. Without the scientific foundation provided by these pioneers, Watson and Crick may never have reached their groundbreaking conclusion of 1953: that the DNA molecule exists in the form of a three-dimensional double helix.


I would just like to say in relation to the Op that I did not state or make clear initially,I would like to take this opportunity now to state for the record, that I never stated any of the above information,links,or theories as being absolute, irrefutable proof of our origins,the connection between "aliens" manipulating our DNA and some of the views of the quoted/linked content.

I can only offer my opinions,theories and thoughts pertinent to the subjects and mysteries themselves.
I cannot "prove" anything...Unfortunately.

That will not stop me from continuing my research and journey within this great mystery known as life


I hope some of you may of learned something new,expanded your mind and the ideas held within and at the very least, enjoyed the read.

thank you for your time.



posted on Feb, 5 2011 @ 06:48 AM
link   
the logo for medicine is another good example





new topics
top topics
 
148
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join