It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Secondly, I have seen the "Truthers'" evidence. It's garbage. It's mostly arguments from personal ignorance, quotemining, and trying to force a square peg into a round hole.
It's retarded to say the least.
Originally posted by Logical one
Any of you "truthers" care to comment on the Norday footage?
Originally posted by Logical one
reply to post by backinblack
Okay so you guys think that the Norday footage is fake then?
Have you actually seen the whole documentory footage that the Norday brothers made and therefore seen the 9/11 clip in context rather than just an isolated clip?
I have, and nothing looks fake to me,
edit on 5-2-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)edit on 5-2-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by Logical one
reply to post by backinblack
Okay so you guys think that the Norday footage is fake then?
Have you actually seen the whole documentory footage that the Norday brothers made and therefore seen the 9/11 clip in context rather than just an isolated clip?
I have, and nothing looks fake to me,
edit on 5-2-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)edit on 5-2-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)
There's plenty to discuss in the OP..
How about doing that??
...the video you posted clearly shows the plane initialy enter the building over 6 or 7 floors..
It's not much of a stretch to think it was angled enough to take out 1 or 2 more..
Therefore the 8 floors quoted seems reasonable.
Originally posted by Logical one
reply to post by backinblack
Okay so you guys think that the Norday footage is fake then?
Have you actually seen the whole documentory footage that the Norday brothers made and therefore seen the 9/11 clip in context rather than just an isolated clip?
I have, and nothing looks fake to me,
edit on 5-2-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)edit on 5-2-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Logical one
reply to post by backinblack
Okay so you guys think that the Norday footage is fake then?
Have you actually seen the whole documentory footage that the Norday brothers made and therefore seen the 9/11 clip in context rather than just an isolated clip?
I have, and nothing looks fake to me,
edit on 5-2-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)edit on 5-2-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by JimFetzer
This is about the quality of response I would expect from some of the know-nothings who resist the truth about 9/11. Did you look at the first fifteen slides of my Powerpoint presentation, "Was 9/11 an 'inside job'?" If you had, you would have learned that Flight 175, had it been a real plane, would have intersected with no less than eight (8) floors consisting of steel trusses filled with 4"-8" of concrete, which were connected to the core columns at one end to the external support columns at the other. The horizontal resistance they provided would have been enormous, since they represent about an acre of concrete apiece. When you consider the damage done by hitting a tiny bird in flight, it becomes apparent that anyone, like hooper, who buys into the official account of 9/11 simply does not understand either the design of the building or the basic elements of classical mechanics. Sorry, hooper, but if you wanted to demonstrate your ignorance of these issues, then you have hit a home run!
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by JimFetzer
Neither the impact of United 175 with the South Tower nor the impact of American 11 with the North show the damage done to the steel and concrete
There was no concrete in the fascia of the towers.
Fail. If you can't get the basics just give it up.
Wow. That's the only nit to pick? I think you might have been the one to fail...
And, LOOK carefully. Especially the interior "camera" view, reverse-angle. It certainly does not encompass the "6 or 7" floors you stated.
@1:25. Again, @1:45, narrator says "...the two floors that sustained most impact damage...."
the two floors that sustained most impact damage
Dude, we aren't communicating properly here.
You are looking at the video, and the portions that show the exterior view...with the damage to the facade from the wings, as they entered.