Was Video Fakery Employed on 9/11? [HOAX], page 33

This has nothing to do with a "minor deceleration". The velocity of the plane should fall to zero, which it obviously does not. I guess this is your latest strategy: to complain that an argument intended to prove one point does not prove a separate and different point. The plane should have crumpled and broken apart on impact, which clearly it did not do. The video you are showing thus substantiates the violation of Newton's third law, where the impact of the (relatively fragile and less dense) plane should have crumpled from the resistance of the (massively robust and more dense) 500,000-ton building. The result would have been the same had the building been in motion and the plane been stationary. Think about that! And what would have ensued had the plane hit a single floor, consisting of a steel truss 208'x208' filled with 4-8" of concrete, suspended in space. A real plane hitting the South Tower at the angle shown would have impacted with eight (8) such floors, which would have provided enormous resistance to its trajectory. It would have crumpled and broken apart, . . . .

reply to post by weedwhacker

---

The determination that the plane was flying at an impossible speed for a Boeing 767 was made by Pilots for 9/11 Truth, where I have given links to their original study. It has now been complemented by "9/11 Intercepted", in which they not only explain that the plane was traveling at an impossible speed but that, at such a speed, it would have been impossible to manage and would actually have come apart in flight. I guess I can believe that you are reduced to gross misrepresentations of my position and of the evidence, since otherwise you would look foolish in pursuing this. Oh! Come to think of it, you DO look foolish for the childish tactics you are employing in your hopeless effort to deny what others have established about video fakery on 9/11. Better luck next time! Links to Pilots studies related to 9/11 may be found at pilotsfor911truth.org...

reply to post by mister.old.school

---

reply to post by mister.old.school

---

This topic, the theory and the people involved is a fabricated ploy to discredit the movement. This is not conjecture but fact. These people started this campaign of disinformation based on nonsense since early 2002. Do not accept these people as legitimate for they are not. There is ample evidence out there that will show you who 'Fetzer' is connected to. They are a concentrated effort that is alive and well today.

Dont waste your time. These people dont believe the theories they push why should you?

Here is some of their topics soon to come to ats.....
Radio Shows – Jim Fetzer. Deanna Spingola, Debbie Lewis:
Part 1 -Deanna Spingola – The Debris Pile of 9/11, Hollow Towers & Missing Contents
Part 2 -Deanna Spingola – The Debris Pile of 9/11, Hollow Towers & Missing Victims
#1: Securing Liberty/Deb Lewis: Missing Contents WTC & Hollow Towers
#2: Securing Liberty/Deb Lewis: Missing Contents WTC & Hollow Towers
The Last American Radio Broadcast – With Phil Jayhan & Larry McWilliams
2 HR. Show: The Hollow Towers & Mechanized Lighting System @ WTC
#1: Jim Fetzer: Phil Jayhan & Larry McWilliams -Hollow Towers & Missing Contents WTC
#2: Jim Fetzer, Larry McWilliams & Phil Jayhan – The Hollow Towers & Fake Victims

Just plain insulting and ridiculous.

What happened to the windowless tanker hologram, firing a napalm missile out of a pod, with mini nukes that collapsed the hollow fake towers on 911 but it all never happened because it was faked on tv, JIM?

The reality is that you have been adrift in the sheltered harbor of our patience

Well, this is pretty silly. I interview various guests to discover their points of view. That does not mean that I therefore agree with them. The hollow towers and missing content is the theory of Phil Jayhan and Larry McWilliams, not mine. I did not know what they were going to argue before they came on the show. So "Get real!" If this is the only way you know how to argue, that's pretty bad. No one is going to take you seriously if you can't do better than this. Since different guests are offering different explanations, they can't all be right. We don't know how it was done, which is why it is important to have guests with different theories of how it was done. OK?

reply to post by Shadow Herder

---

Pilots has confirmed the impossible speed. John Lear has explained why it would be impossible for a Boeing 767 to fly at 560 mph at 70-1,000' altitude, where that is its cruising speed at 35,000 feet, where the air is three times less dense. The engines cannot suck the air through the turbines at that speed and altitude and, if it could be flown that fast at that altitude, it controlled flight would be impossible and the plane would come apart. What is there about this -- which I have explained many times now, including links -- that you don't understand? Check out Pilots' latest documentary, "9/11 Intercepted", where they explain it in terms that even you ought to be able to understand.

reply to post by mister.old.school

---

Curiosity rover has photographed a new UFO
  Posted 13 days ago with 10 member flags

Criticism of Israel now a crime in California.
  Posted 2 days ago with 9 member flags

The power of greed can make you misspell even your own name...
  Posted 11 days ago with 7 member flags

Research into the Prophecies & Predictions of Billy Meier
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags

America announces a cash return of $4.939 trillion for Obama\'s documentation!!!
  Posted 3 days ago with 5 member flags

Sky Portal Appears Over Arctic Facility
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags

Strange Wormhole Portal Appears Over Arctic Facility?
  Posted 4 days ago with 2 member flags

The nuclear attack on the moon-did it REALLY happen?
  Posted 3 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: